Suppr超能文献

数据保护合规性广泛同意将医疗保健数据和人体生物样本用于(生物)医学研究的二次利用:迈向德国新国家标准。

Data protection-compliant broad consent for secondary use of health care data and human biosamples for (bio)medical research: Towards a new German national standard.

机构信息

Staff Unit for Scientific & Medical Technology Development & Coordination (MWTek), Commercial Directorate, Institute for Medical Biometry, Informatics & Epidemiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusbergcampus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.

QUEST Center, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

J Biomed Inform. 2022 Jul;131:104096. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104096. Epub 2022 May 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The secondary use of deidentified but not anonymized patient data is a promising approach for enabling precision medicine and learning health care systems. In most national jurisdictions (e.g., in Europe), this type of secondary use requires patient consent. While various ethical, legal, and technical analyses have stressed the opportunities and challenges for different types of consent over the past decade, no country has yet established a national consent standard accepted by the relevant authorities.

METHODS

A working group of the national Medical Informatics Initiative in Germany conducted a requirements analysis and developed a GDPR-compliant broad consent standard. The development included consensus procedures within the Medical Informatics Initiative, a documented consultation process with all relevant stakeholder groups and authorities, and the ultimate submission for approval via the national data protection authorities.

RESULTS

This paper presents the broad consent text together with a guidance document on mandatory safeguards for broad consent implementation. The mandatory safeguards comprise i) independent review of individual research projects, ii) organizational measures to protect patients from involuntary disclosure of protected information, and iii) comprehensive information for patients and public transparency. This paper further describes the key issues discussed with the relevant authorities, especially the position on additional or alternative consent approaches such as dynamic consent.

DISCUSSION

Both the resulting broad consent text and the national consensus process are relevant for similar activities internationally. A key challenge of aligning consent documents with the various stakeholders was explaining and justifying the decision to use broad consent and the decision against using alternative models such as dynamic consent. Public transparency for all secondary use projects and their results emerged as a key factor in this justification. While currently largely limited to academic medicine in Germany, the first steps for extending this broad consent approach to wider areas of application, including smaller institutions and medical practices, are currently under consideration.

摘要

背景

利用去标识但未匿名的患者数据进行二次使用是实现精准医疗和学习型医疗保健系统的一种有前景的方法。在大多数国家的司法管辖区(例如在欧洲),这种类型的二次使用需要患者同意。虽然在过去十年中,各种伦理、法律和技术分析强调了不同类型同意的机会和挑战,但没有一个国家制定了被相关当局接受的国家同意标准。

方法

德国国家医学信息学倡议的一个工作组进行了需求分析,并制定了符合 GDPR 的广泛同意标准。该开发包括医学信息学倡议内的共识程序、与所有相关利益相关者群体和当局的记录咨询过程,以及最终通过国家数据保护当局提交批准。

结果

本文介绍了广泛同意文本以及关于广泛同意实施的强制性保障措施的指导文件。强制性保障措施包括:i)对个别研究项目进行独立审查,ii)组织措施以保护患者免受受保护信息的非自愿披露,以及 iii)为患者提供全面信息和公众透明度。本文还进一步描述了与相关当局讨论的关键问题,特别是关于额外或替代同意方法(如动态同意)的立场。

讨论

产生的广泛同意文本和国家共识过程在国际上类似活动中都具有相关性。使同意文件与各种利益相关者保持一致的一个关键挑战是解释和证明使用广泛同意的决定以及不使用替代模型(如动态同意)的决定是合理的。所有二次使用项目及其结果的公众透明度成为这一论证的关键因素。虽然目前在德国主要限于学术医学,但目前正在考虑将这种广泛同意方法扩展到更广泛的应用领域,包括较小的机构和医疗实践。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验