• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从构建用于纵向分析用例的数据平台并扩展至77家德国医院中汲取的经验教训:实施报告

Lessons Learned From Building a Data Platform for Longitudinal, Analytical Use Cases and Scaling to 77 German Hospitals: Implementation Report.

作者信息

Bockhacker Markus, Martens Peter, von Münchow Clara, Löser Sarah, Günther Rosita, Kuhlen Ralf, Kannt Olaf, Ortleb Sebastian

机构信息

Helios Kliniken, Friedrichstraße 136, Berlin, 10114, Germany, 49 305213210.

Helios IT Service GmbH, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Sep 12;13:e69853. doi: 10.2196/69853.

DOI:10.2196/69853
PMID:40939633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12431789/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Increasing adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) enables research on real-world data. In Germany, this has been limited to university hospitals, and data from acute care hospitals below the university level are lacking. To address this, we used established design patterns to build a data platform that aggregates and standardizes pseudonymized EHR data with patients' consent.

OBJECTIVE

We report on the design and implementation of the research platform, as well as patient participation and lessons learned during the scaling of the platform, to incorporate real-world data (with participant consent) from 77 hospitals into a unified data lake.

METHODS

Due to variations in EHR adoption, IT infrastructure, software vendors, interface availability, and regulatory requirements, we used an agile development cycle that involves constant, incremental standardization of data. We implemented a layered lambda infrastructure built on Apache Hadoop. Decentralized connectors ensured data minimization and pseudonymization.

UNLABELLED

We successfully scaled our data model both vertically and horizontally in 77 hospitals. However, we encountered issues during the scaling of real-time data pipelines and IHE (Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise) interfaces. During the first 2 years, patients were asked to consent to secondary data use 1,475,244 times during inpatient admission. We registered 1,023,633 broad instances of consent (consent rate 70.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients are generally willing to provide consent for secondary use of their data, but obtaining consent requires considerable effort. Building a research data platform is not an end goal, but rather a necessary step in collecting and standardizing longitudinal data to enable research on real-world data. Through the combination of agile development, phased rollouts, and very high levels of automation, we have been able to achieve fast turnaround times for incorporating user feedback and are constantly improving data quality and standardization.

摘要

背景

电子健康记录(EHR)的采用率不断提高,使得对真实世界数据的研究成为可能。在德国,这一应用仅限于大学医院,缺乏来自大学以下急性护理医院的数据。为了解决这一问题,我们利用既定的设计模式构建了一个数据平台,该平台在患者同意的情况下聚合并标准化假名化的EHR数据。

目的

我们报告研究平台的设计与实施,以及在平台扩展过程中的患者参与情况和经验教训,以便将来自77家医院的真实世界数据(经参与者同意)纳入统一的数据湖。

方法

由于EHR采用情况、IT基础设施、软件供应商、接口可用性和监管要求存在差异,我们采用了敏捷开发周期,其中涉及数据的持续增量标准化。我们实施了基于Apache Hadoop构建的分层lambda基础设施。分散式连接器确保了数据最小化和假名化。

未标注

我们成功地在77家医院对数据模型进行了纵向和横向扩展。然而,我们在实时数据管道和整合医疗卫生企业(IHE)接口的扩展过程中遇到了问题。在最初的两年里,患者在住院期间被要求同意二次使用数据1475244次。我们记录了1023633次广泛的同意实例(同意率70.2%)。

结论

患者通常愿意同意二次使用其数据,但获得同意需要付出相当大的努力。构建研究数据平台不是最终目标,而是收集和标准化纵向数据以实现对真实世界数据进行研究的必要步骤。通过敏捷开发、分阶段推出和高度自动化的结合,我们能够快速响应以纳入用户反馈,并不断提高数据质量和标准化程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca71/12431789/88d6a6bd8319/medinform-v13-e69853-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca71/12431789/d1739a32e85c/medinform-v13-e69853-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca71/12431789/11cc17cd01f3/medinform-v13-e69853-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca71/12431789/5836b20ea9e6/medinform-v13-e69853-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca71/12431789/b6c45818568a/medinform-v13-e69853-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca71/12431789/88d6a6bd8319/medinform-v13-e69853-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca71/12431789/d1739a32e85c/medinform-v13-e69853-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca71/12431789/11cc17cd01f3/medinform-v13-e69853-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca71/12431789/5836b20ea9e6/medinform-v13-e69853-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca71/12431789/b6c45818568a/medinform-v13-e69853-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca71/12431789/88d6a6bd8319/medinform-v13-e69853-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Lessons Learned From Building a Data Platform for Longitudinal, Analytical Use Cases and Scaling to 77 German Hospitals: Implementation Report.从构建用于纵向分析用例的数据平台并扩展至77家德国医院中汲取的经验教训:实施报告
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Sep 12;13:e69853. doi: 10.2196/69853.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Post-pandemic planning for maternity care for local, regional, and national maternity systems across the four nations: a mixed-methods study.针对四个地区的地方、区域和国家孕产妇保健系统的疫情后规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(35):1-25. doi: 10.3310/HHTE6611.
4
Understanding and Addressing Challenges With Electronic Health Record Use in Gynecological Oncology: Cross-Sectional Survey of Multidisciplinary Professionals in the United Kingdom and Co-Design of an Integrated Informatics Platform to Support Clinical Decision-Making.理解并应对妇科肿瘤学中电子健康记录使用的挑战:英国多学科专业人员的横断面调查及支持临床决策的综合信息学平台的协同设计
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Sep 10;11:e58657. doi: 10.2196/58657.
5
A rapid mixed-methods evaluation of remote home monitoring models during the COVID-19 pandemic in England.英格兰 COVID-19 大流行期间远程家庭监护模式的快速混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(13):1-151. doi: 10.3310/FVQW4410.
6
Leveraging Interoperable Electronic Health Record (EHR) Data for Distributed Analyses in Clinical Research: Technical Implementation Report of the HELP Study.利用可互操作的电子健康记录(EHR)数据进行临床研究中的分布式分析:HELP研究的技术实施报告。
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jul 30;13:e68171. doi: 10.2196/68171.
7
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
9
Preexisting Diabetes and Pregnancy: An Endocrine Society and European Society of Endocrinology Joint Clinical Practice Guideline.孕前糖尿病与妊娠:内分泌学会和欧洲内分泌学会联合临床实践指南
Eur J Endocrinol. 2025 Jun 30;193(1):G1-G48. doi: 10.1093/ejendo/lvaf116.
10
Preexisting Diabetes and Pregnancy: An Endocrine Society and European Society of Endocrinology Joint Clinical Practice Guideline.糖尿病合并妊娠:内分泌学会与欧洲内分泌学会联合临床实践指南
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2025 Jul 13. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaf288.

本文引用的文献

1
[Interoperability Working Group: core dataset and information systems for data integration and data exchange in the Medical Informatics Initiative].[互操作性工作组:医学信息学计划中用于数据集成和数据交换的核心数据集及信息系统]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 Jun;67(6):656-667. doi: 10.1007/s00103-024-03888-4. Epub 2024 May 16.
2
[Digital health progress hubs-data integration beyond university hospitals].[数字健康进展中心——超越大学医院的数据整合]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 Jun;67(6):701-709. doi: 10.1007/s00103-024-03883-9. Epub 2024 May 16.
3
iCHECK-DH: Guidelines and Checklist for the Reporting on Digital Health Implementations.
iCHECK-DH:数字健康实施报告的指南和清单。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 10;25:e46694. doi: 10.2196/46694.
4
3LGM2IHE: Requirements for Data-Protection-Compliant Research Infrastructures-A Systematic Comparison of Theory and Practice-Oriented Implementation.3LGM2IHE:符合数据保护要求的研究基础设施的要求——理论与实践导向的实施的系统比较。
Methods Inf Med. 2022 Dec;61(S 02):e134-e148. doi: 10.1055/a-1950-2791. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
5
Usability of Electronic Health Records in Germany - An Overview of Satisfaction of University Hospital Physicians.德国电子健康记录的可用性 - 对大学医院医生满意度的概述。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Aug 17;296:90-97. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220808.
6
Data protection-compliant broad consent for secondary use of health care data and human biosamples for (bio)medical research: Towards a new German national standard.数据保护合规性广泛同意将医疗保健数据和人体生物样本用于(生物)医学研究的二次利用:迈向德国新国家标准。
J Biomed Inform. 2022 Jul;131:104096. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104096. Epub 2022 May 25.
7
Effect of clinical peer review on mortality in patients ventilated for more than 24 hours: a cluster randomised controlled trial.临床同行评审对 24 小时以上通气患者死亡率的影响:一项集群随机对照试验。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Jan;32(1):17-25. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013864. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
8
Towards Harmonized Data Quality in the Medical Informatics Initiative - Current State and Future Directions.迈向医学信息学倡议中的数据质量协调——现状与未来方向。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jan 14;289:240-243. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210904.
9
Quantitating and assessing interoperability between electronic health records.定量评估电子健康记录之间的互操作性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Apr 13;29(5):753-760. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab289.
10
An atomic approach to the design and implementation of a research data warehouse.原子方法在研究数据仓库的设计与实现中的应用。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Mar 15;29(4):601-608. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab204.