Suppr超能文献

不明原因、反复发作、创伤性晕厥伴双束支阻滞老年患者的管理:植入式环路记录器与经验性起搏器植入——倾向评分匹配分析的结果。

Management of older patients with unexplained, recurrent, traumatic syncope and bifascicular block: Implantable loop recorder versus empiric pacemaker implantation-Results of a propensity-matched analysis.

机构信息

Cardiology Unit, "Card. G. Panico" Hospital, Tricase (Le), Italy.

Cardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, Marche Polytechnic University, University Hospital "Umberto I-Lancisi- Salesi", Ancona, Italy.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2022 Oct;19(10):1696-1703. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.05.023. Epub 2022 May 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In patients with unexplained syncope and bifascicular block (BFB), syncope may be caused by intermittent atrioventricular (AV) block. When a correlation between syncope and bradyarrhythmia is not documented in these patients, 2 alternative management strategies can be adopted: (1) empiric pacemaker (PM) implantation or (2) long-term continuous electrocardiographic monitoring by implantable loop recorder (ILR).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the risk of syncope recurrence associated with empiric PM implantation or ILR monitoring.

METHODS

A prospective, multicenter, observational study enrolled consecutive patients with unexplained, recurrent, traumatic syncope and BFB who underwent ILR monitoring or empiric PM implantation. The risk and causes of syncope recurrence were assessed and compared between the 2 groups. Individual 1:1 propensity matching of baseline characteristics was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 309 consecutive patients (age 77.2 ± 12.2 years; 60.8% male) were enrolled. Propensity matching yielded 89 matched pairs. After median follow-up of 33 months, empiric PM implantation was associated with a significantly lower risk of syncope recurrence than ILR monitoring (19.1 vs 46.1%; P <.001). A total of 35 patients (39.3%) who underwent ILR monitoring developed bradyarrhythmias (68.6% paroxysmal AV block) requiring PM implantation during follow-up. Excluding bradyarrhythmic syncope, the most frequent causes of syncope recurrence in both study groups were reflex syncope and orthostatic hypotension.

CONCLUSION

In patients with unexplained, recurrent, traumatic syncope and BFB, empiric PM implantation significantly reduced the risk of syncope recurrence in comparison with ILR monitoring. A high rate of patients who underwent ILR monitoring developed bradyarrhythmias requiring PM implantation.

摘要

背景

在不明原因晕厥伴双束支阻滞(BFB)的患者中,晕厥可能由间歇性房室(AV)阻滞引起。当这些患者的晕厥与心动过缓之间没有相关性记录时,可以采用两种替代管理策略:(1)经验性起搏器(PM)植入或(2)植入式环路记录器(ILR)进行长期连续心电图监测。

目的

本研究旨在比较经验性 PM 植入或 ILR 监测与晕厥复发风险的关系。

方法

前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究纳入了接受 ILR 监测或经验性 PM 植入的不明原因、反复发作、创伤性晕厥伴 BFB 的连续患者。评估并比较了两组患者的晕厥复发风险和原因。对基线特征进行了个体 1:1 倾向匹配。

结果

共纳入 309 例连续患者(年龄 77.2 ± 12.2 岁;60.8%为男性)。倾向匹配得到 89 对匹配。中位随访 33 个月后,经验性 PM 植入与 ILR 监测相比,晕厥复发风险显著降低(19.1%比 46.1%;P<0.001)。在接受 ILR 监测的 35 例患者(39.3%)中,在随访期间发生了需要 PM 植入的心动过缓(68.6%为阵发性 AV 阻滞)。在排除心动过缓性晕厥后,两组患者晕厥复发的最常见原因是反射性晕厥和体位性低血压。

结论

在不明原因、反复发作、创伤性晕厥伴 BFB 的患者中,与 ILR 监测相比,经验性 PM 植入显著降低了晕厥复发的风险。接受 ILR 监测的患者中有很高的比例发生需要 PM 植入的心动过缓。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验