Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America; Lee Kum Sheung Center for Health and Happiness, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America.
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, 1828 L St NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States of America.
Prev Med. 2022 Aug;161:107097. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107097. Epub 2022 May 26.
Colon cancer is the third most common cancer in the US. While the socioeconomic status -health gradient has been established, findings linking adult socioeconomic status to colon cancer incidence specifically are mixed. Considering childhood socioeconomic status (CSES) and relevant risk factors, including related lifestyle behaviors, may provide more insight. At baseline in 1976, women from the Nurses' Health Study reported CSES as defined by parents' occupation when participants were age 16. Lifestyle-related factors (i.e., physical activity, body mass index, diet, alcohol, and tobacco consumption) were self-reported in 1988 or 1990, and every 4 years thereafter until 2016. Cox regression models estimated hazards ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of adopting an unhealthy lifestyle (N = 22,507) and developing colon cancer (N = 100,921) between 1976 and 2016, separately, across parents' occupation levels. During follow-up, 2342 cases of colon cancer occurred. Compared to women whose parents were white collar workers, women whose parents were farmers had lower colon cancer risk (HR = 0.84; 95%CI: 0.72, 0.98), but no differences were evident for women whose parents were blue collar workers in models adjusting for age and familial history of colon cancer. Using the same comparison group, risk of adopting an unhealthy lifestyle over follow-up was not significantly different in women with farmer parents (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.91, 1.02), while children of blue collar workers had slightly greater risk (HR = 1.07; 95%CI: 1.03, 1.12) in age-adjusted models. These findings suggest the impact of CSES on colon cancer risk is modest and varies across outcomes and occupational status.
结肠癌是美国第三大常见癌症。虽然已经确定了社会经济地位-健康梯度,但将成人社会经济地位与结肠癌发病率联系起来的研究结果却存在差异。考虑到儿童社会经济地位(CSES)和相关风险因素,包括相关的生活方式行为,可能会提供更多的见解。在 1976 年基线时,护士健康研究中的女性报告了父母职业定义的 CSES,当时参与者年龄为 16 岁。1988 年或 1990 年报告了与生活方式相关的因素(即体力活动、体重指数、饮食、酒精和烟草消费),此后每 4 年报告一次,直到 2016 年。Cox 回归模型估计了不健康生活方式(N=22507)和结肠癌(N=100921)的发病风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI),分别根据父母的职业水平在 1976 年至 2016 年期间进行了分析。在随访期间,发生了 2342 例结肠癌病例。与父母为白领工人的女性相比,父母为农民的女性结肠癌风险较低(HR=0.84;95%CI:0.72,0.98),但在调整年龄和结肠癌家族史的模型中,父母为蓝领工人的女性则没有差异。使用相同的比较组,在父母为农民的女性中,随访期间采用不健康生活方式的风险无显著差异(HR=0.96,95%CI:0.91,1.02),而蓝领工人的子女风险略高(HR=1.07;95%CI:1.03,1.12)在年龄调整模型中。这些发现表明,CSES 对结肠癌风险的影响是适度的,并且因结果和职业状况而异。