• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区社会经济地位与女性结直肠癌风险的行为途径。

Neighborhood socioeconomic status and behavioral pathways to risks of colon and rectal cancer in women.

机构信息

Department of Society, Human Development, and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2010 Sep 1;116(17):4187-96. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25195.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.25195
PMID:20544839
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2962923/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neighborhood amenities and resources plausibly determine individual modifiable risk factors for colon and rectal cancer. Evidence on the associations between neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) and incident colon and rectal cancer is limited.

METHODS

The authors analyzed a prospective cohort of 111,129 women in the Nurses' Health Study with no history of cancer in 1986 followed to 2006. Neighborhood SES was based on Census-derived characteristics of block groups of residence. Cox models were used to estimate the multivariate-adjusted associations between neighborhood SES and incident colon and rectal cancer, and to examine for effect modification. For significant associations, path models were estimated with behavioral risk factors included as potential mediators.

RESULTS

Neighborhood SES was unassociated with colon cancer among all women. However, among women with college or greater education, higher neighborhood SES was inversely related to colon cancer (P for trend = .01; P for interaction between neighborhood SES and education = .03). Path analysis suggested mediation by red meat intakes and body mass index (BMI). Higher neighborhood SES was inversely related to rectal cancer among all women (relative risk in highest quintile, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.93; P for trend = .08). Path analysis was consistent with mediation by multivitamin use and BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that living in a higher-SES neighborhood may protect against rectal cancer in women and colon cancer in higher-educated women, mediated by selected behavioral risk factors. Risk factor differences between colon and rectal cancer may account for discrepancies in estimated neighborhood effects by cancer site.

摘要

背景

社区设施和资源可能会影响个体结肠癌和直肠癌的可改变风险因素。关于社区社会经济地位(SES)与结肠癌和直肠癌发病风险之间的关联,证据有限。

方法

作者分析了 1986 年无癌症病史的 111129 名护士健康研究中的前瞻性队列,随访至 2006 年。社区 SES 基于居住的街区组的人口普查得出的特征。Cox 模型用于估计社区 SES 与结肠癌和直肠癌发病风险之间的多变量调整关联,并检验其修饰作用。对于显著关联,使用行为风险因素作为潜在的中介,估计路径模型。

结果

社区 SES 与所有女性的结肠癌无关。然而,在受过大学或更高教育的女性中,较高的社区 SES 与结肠癌呈负相关(趋势 P 值=.01;SES 和教育之间的交互作用 P 值=.03)。路径分析表明,肉类摄入量和体重指数(BMI)起中介作用。SES 较高的社区与所有女性的直肠癌呈负相关(最高五分位数的相对风险,0.64;95%置信区间,0.44-0.93;趋势 P 值=.08)。路径分析与使用多种维生素和 BMI 作为中介一致。

结论

这些发现表明,生活在 SES 较高的社区可能会降低女性患直肠癌和高学历女性患结肠癌的风险,其机制可能是通过选择行为风险因素。结肠癌和直肠癌之间的风险因素差异可能解释了按癌症部位估计的社区效应的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/799d/2962923/32e3073b2e03/nihms-222178-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/799d/2962923/e4ba243b2f62/nihms-222178-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/799d/2962923/32e3073b2e03/nihms-222178-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/799d/2962923/e4ba243b2f62/nihms-222178-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/799d/2962923/32e3073b2e03/nihms-222178-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Neighborhood socioeconomic status and behavioral pathways to risks of colon and rectal cancer in women.社区社会经济地位与女性结直肠癌风险的行为途径。
Cancer. 2010 Sep 1;116(17):4187-96. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25195.
2
Contribution of behavioral risk factors and obesity to socioeconomic differences in colorectal cancer incidence.行为风险因素和肥胖对结直肠癌发病率的社会经济差异的影响。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Sep 19;104(18):1353-62. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs346. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
3
Ten-year change in neighborhood socioeconomic status and colorectal cancer.十年间邻里社会经济地位变化与结直肠癌的关系
Cancer. 2019 Feb 15;125(4):610-617. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31832. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
4
Contribution of health behaviors to the association between area-level socioeconomic status and cancer mortality.健康行为对地区层面社会经济地位与癌症死亡率之间关联的贡献。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Jan;148:52-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.023. Epub 2015 Nov 22.
5
Socioeconomic Status, Diet, and Behavioral Factors and Cardiometabolic Diseases and Mortality.社会经济地位、饮食和行为因素与心血管代谢疾病及死亡率
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2451837. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.51837.
6
Body size and risk of colon and rectal cancer in the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC).欧洲癌症与营养前瞻性调查(EPIC)中身体大小与结肠癌和直肠癌风险的关系
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Jul 5;98(13):920-31. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj246.
7
Neighborhood SES is particularly important to the cardiovascular health of low SES individuals.社区社会经济地位对社会经济地位较低者的心血管健康尤为重要。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Sep;188:60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
8
Socioeconomic status and the risk of colorectal cancer: an analysis of more than a half million adults in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study.社会经济地位与结直肠癌风险:美国国立卫生研究院-美国退休人员协会饮食与健康研究中超过 50 万名成年人的分析。
Cancer. 2012 Jul 15;118(14):3636-44. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26677. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
9
Neighborhood and Individual Socioeconomic Status and Asthma Incidence in African American Women.非裔美国女性的邻里和个体社会经济地位与哮喘发病率。
Ethn Dis. 2016 Jan 21;26(1):113-22. doi: 10.18865/ed.26.1.113.
10
Home and Workplace Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and Behavior-related Health: A Within-individual Analysis.家庭和工作场所邻里的社会经济地位与行为相关健康:个体内分析。
Ann Behav Med. 2021 Jul 22;55(8):779-790. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaa116.

引用本文的文献

1
Area-level socioeconomic status is associated with colorectal cancer screening, incidence and mortality in the US: a systematic review and meta-analysis.美国地区层面的社会经济地位与结直肠癌筛查、发病率及死亡率相关:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
Soc Sci Med. 2025 Sep;381:118212. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118212. Epub 2025 May 16.
2
Outcomes for Medicaid Patients with Colorectal Cancer Are Improved in Affluent Neighborhoods, but Disparities Persist.在富裕社区,医疗补助计划覆盖的结直肠癌患者的治疗效果有所改善,但差距依然存在。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 22;17(9):1399. doi: 10.3390/cancers17091399.
3
Alcohol Intake, Drinking Pattern, and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Three Prospective Cohorts of U.S. Women and Men.

本文引用的文献

1
Social inequalities in stage at diagnosis of rectal but not in colonic cancer: a nationwide study.直肠癌而非结肠癌诊断分期中的社会不平等:一项全国性研究。
Br J Cancer. 2008 Feb 12;98(3):668-73. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604215. Epub 2008 Jan 29.
2
Dietary risk factors for colon and rectal cancers: a comparative case-control study.结肠癌和直肠癌的饮食风险因素:一项对比病例对照研究。
J Epidemiol. 2006 May;16(3):125-35. doi: 10.2188/jea.16.125.
3
Neighborhood influences on adolescent cigarette and alcohol use: mediating effects through parent and peer behaviors.
美国女性和男性三个前瞻性队列中的酒精摄入量、饮酒模式与2型糖尿病风险
Diabetes Care. 2025 Jul 1;48(7):1189-1197. doi: 10.2337/dc24-1902.
4
Factors Associated With Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Outcomes.与局部晚期直肠癌结局的种族和民族差异相关的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e240044. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0044.
5
Moderate alcohol consumption, types of beverages and drinking pattern with cardiometabolic biomarkers in three cohorts of US men and women.美国男性和女性三个队列中,中等量饮酒、饮料类型和饮酒模式与心脏代谢生物标志物的关系。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2023 Nov;38(11):1185-1196. doi: 10.1007/s10654-023-01053-w. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
6
Effects of ranitidine and nizatidine on the risk of gastrointestinal cancer.雷尼替丁和尼扎替丁对胃肠道癌风险的影响。
Front Oncol. 2023 Jul 27;13:1182174. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1182174. eCollection 2023.
7
Physical activity and breast cancer survival: results from the Nurses' Health Studies.体力活动与乳腺癌生存:来自护士健康研究的结果。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2023 Jan 3;7(1). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkac085.
8
The impact of driving time, distance, and socioeconomic factors on outcomes of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.驾驶时间、距离和社会经济因素对局部晚期直肠癌患者预后的影响。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2020 May 24;1:100012. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2020.100012. eCollection 2020 Nov.
9
Use of Multiple Correspondence Analysis and K-means to Explore Associations Between Risk Factors and Likelihood of Colorectal Cancer: Cross-sectional Study.运用多元对应分析和 K-均值聚类分析探究结直肠癌风险因素与可能性之间的关联:一项横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 19;24(7):e29056. doi: 10.2196/29056.
10
Childhood socioeconomic status, healthy lifestyle, and colon cancer risk in a cohort of U.S. women.美国女性队列研究中儿童时期社会经济地位、健康生活方式与结肠癌风险的关系
Prev Med. 2022 Aug;161:107097. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107097. Epub 2022 May 26.
邻里环境对青少年吸烟和饮酒行为的影响:通过父母及同伴行为产生的中介效应
J Health Soc Behav. 2005 Jun;46(2):187-204. doi: 10.1177/002214650504600205.
4
Effects of neighbourhood socioeconomic status and convenience store concentration on individual level smoking.邻里社会经济地位和便利店集中度对个体层面吸烟行为的影响。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Jul;59(7):568-73. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.029041.
5
Neighbourhood influences on health in Montréal, Canada.加拿大蒙特利尔市社区环境对健康的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Oct;59(7):1485-94. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.01.016.
6
Introduction to the special section on cognitive abilities: 100 years after Spearman's (1904) "'General intelligence,' objectively determined and measured".认知能力专题介绍:斯皮尔曼(1904年)发表《“一般智力”,客观确定与测量》100年后。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Jan;86(1):96-111. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.96.
7
Comparison of risk factors for colon and rectal cancer.结肠癌和直肠癌危险因素的比较。
Int J Cancer. 2004 Jan 20;108(3):433-42. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11540.
8
Multivitamin use and colorectal cancer incidence in a US cohort: does timing matter?美国队列中多种维生素的使用与结直肠癌发病率:时间选择重要吗?
Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Oct 1;158(7):621-8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwg190.
9
Are there two sides to colorectal cancer?结直肠癌有两面性吗?
Int J Cancer. 2002 Oct 10;101(5):403-8. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10635.
10
Neighborhood context and cardiovascular disease risk factors: the contribution of material deprivation.邻里环境与心血管疾病风险因素:物质匮乏的影响
Ethn Dis. 2001 Fall;11(4):687-700.