• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 9 周妊娠前药物流产患者感知护理质量的西班牙语量表的验证。

Validation of a Spanish-language scale for evaluating perceived quality of care of medical abortions before 9 weeks gestation.

机构信息

Atenció a la Salut Sexual i Reproductiva, Institut Català de la Salut, Granollers, Barcelona, Spain.

GRASSIR Research Group, IDIAPJGol, Generalitat de Catalunya (SGR 2014-2016), Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Womens Health. 2022 May 28;22(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01763-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12905-022-01763-5
PMID:35643523
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9148507/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Spanish Organic Law 2/2010 legalizes abortion within 14 weeks of gestation. Medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol is around 97% effective and is offered at primary care centers during the first 9 weeks of gestation. It consists of the administration of 200 mg of mifepristone by a healthcare professional and of the self-administration 800 mg of misoprostol by the patient at home, along with prescribed analgesics. However, the quality of this process as perceived by patients has never been assessed. This study aims to validate a scale designed to assess the perceived quality of the entire process, structure and results of at-home medical abortion.

METHODS

Validation study of a Spanish adaptation of the SERVPERF scale. In total, 289 patients completed a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 26 items previously evaluated by a group of experts. A re-test was performed on 53 of these patients 15 days later to assess interobserver consistency.

RESULTS

The highest non-response rate for any single item was 2.1%. The floor effect was 26% and the ceiling effect did not surpass 83%. The linearly weighted Kappa coefficient was good to excellent, in general. An exploratory factor analysis was performed with Varimax rotation, obtaining a total of 7 dimensions that explain 65.9% of the variability. The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) for all items was 0.862.

CONCLUSION

This psychometric instrument is valid and reliable for assessing the quality of care of medical abortion. Medical abortion is efficient, effective and eliminates the need for hospital care, anesthesia and surgical risk. However, user satisfaction has yet to be determined. This study offers a validated scale to assess perceived quality of care, their quality experience and person-centered care for abortion as a fundamental part of overall service quality as a fundamental part of overall service quality.

摘要

背景

西班牙第 2/2010 号组织法将妊娠 14 周内的堕胎合法化。米非司酮和米索前列醇药物流产的有效率约为 97%,在妊娠前 9 周内可在初级保健中心提供。该方法包括由医疗保健专业人员给药 200 毫克米非司酮,以及患者在家中自行给药 800 毫克米索前列醇,并开具规定的镇痛药。然而,患者对这一过程的质量评估从未进行过。本研究旨在验证一种专门用于评估在家中进行的药物流产整个过程、结构和结果的感知质量的量表。

方法

对 SERVPERF 量表的西班牙语版本进行验证研究。共有 289 名患者完成了一份由专家组预先评估的 26 项的自我管理问卷。其中 53 名患者在 15 天后进行了重测,以评估观察者间的一致性。

结果

任何单一项目的最高非响应率为 2.1%。地板效应为 26%,上限效应不超过 83%。线性加权 Kappa 系数总体上为良好至优秀。采用 Varimax 旋转进行探索性因子分析,共得到 7 个维度,可解释 65.9%的变异性。所有项目的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha)为 0.862。

结论

该心理计量工具可用于评估药物流产护理的质量,具有良好的信度和效度。药物流产效率高、效果好,可避免住院治疗、麻醉和手术风险。然而,用户满意度尚未确定。本研究提供了一种经过验证的量表,用于评估对堕胎的护理质量、体验质量和以患者为中心的护理,这是服务质量整体的基本组成部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/061d/9148507/83aaf0e8966b/12905_2022_1763_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/061d/9148507/83aaf0e8966b/12905_2022_1763_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/061d/9148507/83aaf0e8966b/12905_2022_1763_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of a Spanish-language scale for evaluating perceived quality of care of medical abortions before 9 weeks gestation.评估 9 周妊娠前药物流产患者感知护理质量的西班牙语量表的验证。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 May 28;22(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01763-5.
2
Home self-administration of vaginal misoprostol for medical abortion at 50-63 days compared with gestation of below 50 days.妊娠 50-63 天行门诊在家自行应用米索前列醇药物流产与妊娠<50 天行药物流产的比较。
Hum Reprod. 2010 May;25(5):1153-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq037. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
3
Vaginal misoprostol administered 1, 2, or 3 days after mifepristone for early medical abortion: A randomized trial.米非司酮用于早期药物流产后1、2或3天给予阴道米索前列醇:一项随机试验。
JAMA. 2000 Oct 18;284(15):1948-53. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.15.1948.
4
Safety, Efficacy and Acceptability of Early First Trimester Abortion using Oral Mifepristone and Sublingual Misoprostol.孕早期使用口服米非司酮和舌下含服米索前列醇进行早期人工流产的安全性、有效性和可接受性。
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2018 Oct 30;16(3):269-273.
5
Medical termination for pregnancy in early first trimester (≤ 63 days) using combination of mifepristone and misoprostol or misoprostol alone: a systematic review.早期妊娠(≤63 天)人用药物流产:米非司酮配伍米索前列醇或单独应用米索前列醇终止早孕的系统评价。
BMC Womens Health. 2020 Jul 7;20(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-01003-8.
6
Follow-up strategies to confirm the success of medical abortion of pregnancies up to 10 weeks' gestation: a systematic review with meta-analyses.随访策略以确认妊娠 10 周内药物流产的成功:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun;222(6):551-563.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1244. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
7
Implementing medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol in Norway 1998-2013.1998 - 2013年在挪威使用米非司酮和米索前列醇实施药物流产
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Apr 1;46(2):643-651. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw270.
8
Simultaneous compared to interval administration of mifepristone and misoprostol for medical abortion up to 10 weeks' gestation: a systematic review with meta-analyses.米非司酮和米索前列醇同期给药与间隔给药用于 10 周妊娠以下药物流产的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Oct;46(4):270-278. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2019-200448. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
9
Expulsion at home for early medical abortion: A systematic review with meta-analyses.在家中进行早期药物流产:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Apr;100(4):727-735. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14025. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
10
Efficacy and safety of medical abortion using mifepristone and buccal misoprostol through 63 days.米非司酮与口腔含服米索前列醇用于63天内药物流产的有效性和安全性。
Contraception. 2015 Apr;91(4):269-73. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
[Validation of the SERVPERF tool for quality analysis in emergency care with clinical ultrasound].[用于临床超声急诊护理质量分析的SERVPERF工具的验证]
Aten Primaria. 2025 Jun;57(6):103204. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2024.103204. Epub 2024 Dec 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of a person-centered abortion scale: the experiences of care in private facilities in Kenya.开发和验证以人为本的堕胎量表:肯尼亚私立机构中的护理体验。
BMC Womens Health. 2020 Sep 19;20(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-01071-w.
2
Is there a difference in women's experiences of care with medication vs. manual vacuum aspiration abortions? Determinants of person-centered care for abortion services.药物流产与手动吸引流产术在女性护理体验方面是否存在差异? 以人为中心的流产服务决定因素。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 25;14(11):e0225333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225333. eCollection 2019.
3
Women's Satisfaction With and Perceptions of the Quality of Postabortion Care at Public-Sector Facilities in Mainland Tanzania and in Zanzibar.
坦桑尼亚大陆和桑给巴尔公立部门堕胎后护理的质量,女性的满意度和认知。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019 Aug 27;7(Suppl 2):S299-S314. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00026. Print 2019 Aug 22.
4
Verifying alternative measures of healthcare service quality.验证医疗服务质量的替代指标。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2019 Mar 11;32(2):516-533. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-05-2016-0069.
5
Women's satisfaction with abortion care in academic family medicine centers.
Fam Med. 2015 Feb;47(2):98-106.
6
Women know best--findings from a thematic analysis of 5,214 surveys of abortion care experience.女性最有发言权——对5214份堕胎护理经历调查的主题分析结果
Womens Health Issues. 2014 Nov-Dec;24(6):594-9. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
7
[Health care quality perceived by the patients in an urban health centre in A Coruña].[在拉科鲁尼亚市一家城市医疗中心患者所感知的医疗保健质量]
Enferm Clin. 2012 Jul-Aug;22(4):182-90. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
8
Predictors of patient satisfaction with hospital health care.患者对医院医疗保健满意度的预测因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug 16;6:102. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-102.
9
[Assessment of quality as perceived by users of an outpatient pharmaceutical care unit].
Farm Hosp. 2006 Mar-Apr;30(2):99-104. doi: 10.1016/s1130-6343(06)73954-x.
10
Medical versus surgical abortion: comparing satisfaction and potential confounders in a partly randomized study.药物流产与手术流产:在一项部分随机研究中比较满意度及潜在混杂因素
Hum Reprod. 2005 Mar;20(3):834-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh643. Epub 2004 Dec 23.