Suppr超能文献

米非司酮与口腔含服米索前列醇用于63天内药物流产的有效性和安全性。

Efficacy and safety of medical abortion using mifepristone and buccal misoprostol through 63 days.

作者信息

Gatter Mary, Cleland Kelly, Nucatola Deborah L

机构信息

Planned Parenthood Los Angeles, 400 West 30th St., Los Angeles, CA 90007.

218 Wallace Hall, Office of Population Research, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.

出版信息

Contraception. 2015 Apr;91(4):269-73. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to report on the safety and efficacy of an evidence-based medical abortion regimen utilizing 200 mg of mifepristone orally followed by home use of 800 mcg misoprostol buccally 24-48 h later through 63 days estimated gestational age.

STUDY DESIGN

We analyzed outcomes in women presenting for medical abortion between April 1, 2006, and May 31, 2011, using an evidence-based alternative to the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved regimen. Cases were identified for this descriptive study from our electronic practice management (EPM) database, and our electronic database on adverse events was queried for information on efficacy and safety. The primary outcome was successful abortion. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of successful abortion.

RESULTS

Among the 13,373 women who completed follow-up, efficacy of the regimen was 97.7%. Efficacy was highest at 29 to 35 days (98.8%) and 36 to 42 days (98.8%) of gestation and lowest at 57 to 63 days (95.5%). The odds of needing aspiration for any reason were greatest at higher gestational ages. Rates of infection requiring hospitalization and rates of transfusion were 0.01 and 0.03%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

An evidence-based regimen of 200 mg of mifepristone orally followed by home use of 800 mcg of buccal misoprostol 24-48 h later is safe and effective through 63 days estimated gestational age. Further, the need for aspiration for any reason was low, and hospitalization was rare.

IMPLICATIONS

This study reinforces the safety and efficacy of the evidence-based regimen for medical abortion (200 mg mifepristone orally followed by home use of 800 mcg of misoprostol buccally 24-48 h later) through 63 days estimated gestational age, and contributes to the existing evidence against restrictions requiring use of the FDA-approved regimen.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在报告一种循证医学药物流产方案的安全性和有效性,该方案为口服200毫克米非司酮,24至48小时后在家中口腔含服800微克米索前列醇,适用于妊娠估计孕周达63天者。

研究设计

我们分析了2006年4月1日至2011年5月31日期间前来接受药物流产的女性的结局,采用的是一种循证医学替代方案,而非美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的方案。通过我们的电子实践管理(EPM)数据库确定用于此项描述性研究的病例,并查询我们关于不良事件的电子数据库以获取疗效和安全性信息。主要结局为流产成功。采用逻辑回归来确定流产成功的预测因素。

结果

在完成随访的13373名女性中,该方案的有效性为97.7%。妊娠29至35天(98.8%)和36至42天(98.8%)时有效性最高,妊娠57至63天(95.5%)时有效性最低。在较高孕周时,因任何原因需要进行清宫术的几率最大。需要住院治疗的感染率和输血率分别为0.01%和0.03%。

结论

口服200毫克米非司酮,24至48小时后在家中口腔含服800微克米索前列醇的循证医学方案在妊娠估计孕周达63天时是安全有效的。此外,因任何原因进行清宫术的需求较低,住院情况也很少见。

启示

本研究强化了循证医学药物流产方案(口服200毫克米非司酮,24至48小时后在家中口腔含服800微克米索前列醇)在妊娠估计孕周达63天时的安全性和有效性,并为反对使用FDA批准方案的现有证据提供了补充。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of medical abortion using mifepristone and buccal misoprostol through 63 days.
Contraception. 2015 Apr;91(4):269-73. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
2
Efficacy and safety of mifepristone-buccal misoprostol for early medical abortion in an Australian clinical setting.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Jun;57(3):366-371. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12608. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
4
Early pregnancy termination with mifepristone and misoprostol in Norway.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001 Nov;80(11):1056-61.
6
Termination of pregnancy at 9-13 weeks' amenorrhoea with mifepristone and misoprostol.
Lancet. 1998 Aug 15;352(9127):542-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)79250-3.
8
Randomized trial of mifepristone and buccal or vaginal misoprostol for abortion through 56 days of last menstrual period.
Contraception. 2005 Nov;72(5):328-32. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.05.017. Epub 2005 Aug 9.
9
Effectiveness of medical abortion with mifepristone and buccal misoprostol through 59 gestational days.
Contraception. 2009 Sep;80(3):282-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.03.010. Epub 2009 May 2.
10
The combination of mifepristone and misoprostol for the termination of pregnancy.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Oct;115(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.07.013. Epub 2011 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatial Disparities in Mifepristone Use for Early Miscarriage and Induced Abortion Among Obstetrician-Gynecologists Practicing in Massachusetts.
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2024 Oct 4;5(1):765-774. doi: 10.1089/whr.2024.0085. eCollection 2024.
2
Effectiveness and safety of telehealth medication abortion in the USA.
Nat Med. 2024 Apr;30(4):1191-1198. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-02834-w. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
4
Japan's approval of oral abortion pills: A new era of opportunities and challenges in aligning with global standards.
Womens Health (Lond). 2023 Jan-Dec;19:17455057231216533. doi: 10.1177/17455057231216533.
5
Self-Managed Medication Abortion: Implications for Clinical Practice.
Linacre Q. 2023 Aug;90(3):273-289. doi: 10.1177/00243639221128389. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
7
Mifepristone (RU-486) as a Schedule IV Controlled Drug-Implications for a Misleading Drug Policy on Women's Health Care.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 8;19(14):8363. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148363.
8
Medication abortion: A perfect solution?
Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug;57(4):717-719. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14013. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
9
U.S. Abortion Care Providers' Perspectives on Self-Managed Abortion.
Qual Health Res. 2022 Apr;32(5):788-799. doi: 10.1177/10497323221077296. Epub 2022 Mar 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Significant adverse events and outcomes after medical abortion.
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;121(1):166-71. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3182755763.
2
Changes in service delivery patterns after introduction of telemedicine provision of medical abortion in Iowa.
Am J Public Health. 2013 Jan;103(1):73-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301097. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
3
Extending outpatient medical abortion services through 70 days of gestational age.
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;120(5):1070-6. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31826c315f.
4
Infection and extramural delivery with use of digoxin as a feticidal agent.
Contraception. 2012 Feb;85(2):150-4. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.005. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
5
Comparison of medical abortion follow-up with serum human chorionic gonadotropin testing and in-office assessment.
Contraception. 2012 Apr;85(4):402-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.09.007. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
6
Alternatives to a routine follow-up visit for early medical abortion.
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Feb;115(2 Pt 1):264-272. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c996f3.
7
Effectiveness of medical abortion with mifepristone and buccal misoprostol through 59 gestational days.
Contraception. 2009 Sep;80(3):282-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.03.010. Epub 2009 May 2.
8
Two distinct oral routes of misoprostol in mifepristone medical abortion: a randomized controlled trial.
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;112(6):1303-1310. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818d8eb4.
9
Risk factors for unsuccessful medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(4):462-6. doi: 10.1080/00016340701203632.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验