Jiang Wei-Wei, Fan Xue-Mei, Zhang Jia-Hua, Fu Zi-Man, Pu Cong-Shan, Shan Chun-Jian
School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China.
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2022 May 15;24(5):492-499. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2112088.
To study the influence of umbilical cord milking versus delayed cord clamping on the early prognosis of preterm infants with a gestational age of <34 weeks.
PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, Weipu Database, and SinoMed were searched for randomized controlled trials on umbilical cord milking versus delayed cord clamping in preterm infants with a gestational age of <34 weeks published up to November 2021. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two researchers independently performed literature screening, quality evaluation, and data extraction. Review Manger 5.4 was used for Meta analysis.
A total of 11 articles were included in the analysis, with 1 621 preterm infants in total, among whom there were 809 infants in the umbilical cord milking group and 812 in the delayed cord clamping group. The Meta analysis showed that compared with delayed cord clamping, umbilical cord milking increased the mean blood pressure after birth (weighted mean difference=3.61, 95%: 0.73-6.50, =0.01), but it also increased the incidence rate of severe intraventricular hemorrhage (=1.83, 95%: 1.08-3.09, =0.02). There were no significant differences between the two groups in hemoglobin, hematocrit, blood transfusion rate, proportion of infants undergoing phototherapy, bilirubin peak, and incidence rates of complications such as periventricular leukomalacia and necrotizing enterocolitis (>0.05).
Compared with delayed cord clamping, umbilical cord milking may increase the risk of severe intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants with a gestational age of <34 weeks; however, more high-quality large-sample randomized controlled trials are needed for further confirmation.
研究脐带挤血与延迟脐带结扎对孕周<34周早产儿早期预后的影响。
检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、CINAHL、中国知网、万方数据、维普数据库和中国生物医学文献数据库,查找截至2021年11月发表的关于孕周<34周早产儿脐带挤血与延迟脐带结扎的随机对照试验。根据纳入和排除标准,两名研究人员独立进行文献筛选、质量评估和数据提取。使用Review Manger 5.4进行Meta分析。
共纳入11篇文章进行分析,共计1621例早产儿,其中脐带挤血组809例,延迟脐带结扎组812例。Meta分析显示,与延迟脐带结扎相比,脐带挤血可提高出生后平均血压(加权均数差=3.61,95%:0.73-6.50,P=0.01),但也增加了重度脑室内出血的发生率(比值比=1.83,95%:1.08-3.09,P=0.02)。两组在血红蛋白、血细胞比容、输血率、接受光疗的婴儿比例、胆红素峰值以及脑室周围白质软化和坏死性小肠结肠炎等并发症的发生率方面无显著差异(P>0.05)。
与延迟脐带结扎相比,脐带挤血可能增加孕周<34周早产儿发生重度脑室内出血的风险;然而,需要更多高质量大样本随机对照试验进行进一步证实。