Suppr超能文献

延迟夹闭与挤捏脐带在早产儿中的应用:一项随机对照试验。

Delayed clamping vs milking of umbilical cord in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, TriHealth, Cincinnati, OH.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, TriHealth, Cincinnati, OH.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 May;220(5):482.e1-482.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.234. Epub 2019 Feb 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It has been established that delayed umbilical cord clamping in preterm infants results in improvement in neonatal anemia, need for transfusion, incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis, and intraventricular hemorrhage by increasing neonatal circulating blood volume. However, the effects of umbilical cord milking as an alternative to delayed clamping in preterm infants are unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to compare the effect of delayed clamping vs milking of the umbilical cord on the initial hematocrit concentration in preterm births (23-34 weeks gestation). In addition, we sought to compare the effects of delayed clamping vs milking on the incidences of intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, and need for transfusion (secondary objectives).

STUDY DESIGN

The study was an unblinded randomized controlled trial of singleton preterm infants who were born 23 weeks 0 days to 34 weeks 6 days gestation and were assigned to 1 of 2 controlled study groups: delayed cord clamping for 60 seconds or milking of the cord towards the infant 4 times before clamping. Randomization occurred via block randomization with an allocation ratio of 1 to 1. The patients' third stage of delivery was standardized for route of delivery and randomization arm. All comparisons were preformed with an intent-to-treat analysis approach. The study was powered at 80% with a probability value of .05 for the primary outcome measure of a hematocrit difference of 3% between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Of the 204 randomized patients, 104 were assigned to the delayed subgroup, and 100 were assigned to the milking subgroup. There were no significant differences in baseline maternal characteristics noted between groups. Though there was not any statistically significant difference in neonatal outcomes between the cord clamping and milking groups, the occurrences of transfusion (15.5% vs 9.1%; P=.24), necrotizing enterocolitis (5.8% vs 3.0%; P=.49), and intraventricular hemorrhage (15.5% vs 10.1%; P=.35) were all lower in the milking group. The milking group had higher initial hematocrit concentration compared with the delayed clamping group, although this was not significant (51.8 [6.2%] vs 49.9 [7.7%]; P=.07]. Peak bilirubin levels and need for phototherapy were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that milking the umbilical cord may be an acceptable alternative to delayed cord clamping because there were similar effects on neonatal hematocrit concentrations and the need for neonatal transfusions and no increased risk for complications or neonatal morbidity. The present data support the concept that milking of the umbilical cord may offer an efficient and timely method of providing increased blood volume to the infant.

摘要

背景

已证实,延迟早产儿脐带夹闭可通过增加新生儿循环血量,改善新生儿贫血、输血需求、坏死性小肠结肠炎和颅内出血的发生率。然而,脐带挤奶作为早产儿脐带夹闭的替代方法的效果尚不清楚。

目的

本研究的主要目的是比较延迟夹闭与挤奶对 23-34 周早产儿初始血细胞比容浓度的影响。此外,我们还旨在比较延迟夹闭与挤奶对颅内出血、坏死性小肠结肠炎和输血需求的影响(次要目标)。

研究设计

这是一项针对单胎早产儿的非盲随机对照试验,这些早产儿出生于 23 周 0 天至 34 周 6 天,分为 2 个对照研究组之一:延迟夹闭 60 秒或向婴儿方向挤奶 4 次后夹闭脐带。随机化采用区组随机化,分配比例为 1:1。根据分娩方式和随机分组,对患者的第三产程进行了标准化。所有比较均采用意向治疗分析方法进行。该研究的效能为 80%,概率值为 0.05,用于主要结局测量,即两组间血细胞比容差异 3%。

结果

在 204 名随机患者中,104 名被分配到延迟组,100 名被分配到挤奶组。两组之间的基线产妇特征无显著差异。尽管脐带夹闭组和挤奶组之间的新生儿结局无统计学差异,但输血(15.5%比 9.1%;P=0.24)、坏死性小肠结肠炎(5.8%比 3.0%;P=0.49)和颅内出血(15.5%比 10.1%;P=0.35)的发生率均较低。与延迟夹闭组相比,挤奶组的初始血细胞比容浓度较高,但无统计学意义(51.8[6.2%]比 49.9[7.7%];P=0.07)。两组间胆红素峰值和光疗需求相似。

结论

本研究表明,挤奶脐带可能是延迟夹闭的一种可接受的替代方法,因为对新生儿血细胞比容浓度和新生儿输血需求的影响相似,且不会增加并发症或新生儿发病率的风险。目前的数据支持这样一种观点,即挤奶脐带可能提供一种有效和及时的方法,为婴儿提供增加的血量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验