• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

背景与设计:Swedeheart 研究:基于注册登记、阶梯式、群组随机、开放性标签、多中心临床试验,旨在比较普拉格雷和替格瑞洛治疗急性冠脉综合征患者的疗效。

Rationale and design of switch Swedeheart: A registry-based, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized, open-label multicenter trial to compare prasugrel and ticagrelor for treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Department of Cardiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2022 Sep;251:70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.05.017. Epub 2022 May 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2022.05.017
PMID:35644221
Abstract

BACKGROUND

European treatment guidelines recommend prasugrel over ticagrelor for treating patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS), prompting several Swedish administrative regions to transition from ticagrelor to prasugrel as the preferred treatment for patients with ACS. We aim to systematically evaluate this transition to determine the relative efficacy of prasugrel versus ticagrelor in a real-world cohort of patients with ACS.

STUDY DESIGN AND OBJECTIVES

The SWITCH SWEDEHEART trial is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, cross-sectional, stepped-wedge cluster-randomized clinical trial, in which administrative regions in Sweden will constitute the clusters. At the start of the study, all clusters will use ticagrelor as the P2Y12 inhibitor drug of choice for ACS. The order in which the clusters will implement the transition from ticagrelor to prasugrel will be randomly assigned. Every 9 months, 1 cluster will switch from ticagrelor to prasugrel as the P2Y12 inhibitor of choice for patients with ACS. The primary endpoint is the composite 1-year rate of the death, stroke, or myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

The SWITCH SWEDEHEART study will provide an extensive randomized comparison between ticagrelor and prasugrel. Novel therapies are frequently costly and supported by evidence from few or small studies, and systematic evaluation after the introduction is rare. This study will establish an important standard for introducing and evaluating the effects of health care changes within our societies.

摘要

背景

欧洲治疗指南建议在非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中使用普拉格雷而非替格瑞洛进行治疗,这促使瑞典的几个行政区域将替格瑞洛转换为普拉格雷,作为 ACS 患者的首选治疗药物。我们旨在通过系统评估这一转变,来确定普拉格雷与替格瑞洛在 ACS 真实世界患者队列中的相对疗效。

研究设计和目的

SWITCH SWEDEHEART 试验是一项前瞻性、多中心、开放标签、横断面、阶梯式楔形集群随机临床试验,其中瑞典的行政区域将构成集群。在研究开始时,所有集群都将使用替格瑞洛作为 ACS 的首选 P2Y12 抑制剂药物。集群从替格瑞洛转换为普拉格雷的顺序将随机分配。每 9 个月,1 个集群将从替格瑞洛转换为普拉格雷,作为 ACS 患者的首选 P2Y12 抑制剂。主要终点是 1 年内死亡、卒中和心肌梗死的复合发生率。

结论

SWITCH SWEDEHEART 研究将提供替格瑞洛和普拉格雷之间的广泛随机比较。新型疗法通常成本高昂,并且仅基于少数或小型研究的证据支持,而引入后的系统评估却很少见。这项研究将为我们的社会引入和评估医疗保健变化的效果建立一个重要的标准。

相似文献

1
Rationale and design of switch Swedeheart: A registry-based, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized, open-label multicenter trial to compare prasugrel and ticagrelor for treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome.背景与设计:Swedeheart 研究:基于注册登记、阶梯式、群组随机、开放性标签、多中心临床试验,旨在比较普拉格雷和替格瑞洛治疗急性冠脉综合征患者的疗效。
Am Heart J. 2022 Sep;251:70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.05.017. Epub 2022 May 26.
2
Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes.替格瑞洛或普拉格雷用于非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Nov 24;76(21):2436-2446. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.584.
3
Comparison of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel for Inflammation, Vascular Function, and Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Diabetic Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Requiring Coronary Stenting: A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover Trial.比较替格瑞洛与普拉格雷对需冠脉支架置入的非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征合并糖尿病患者炎症、血管功能和循环内皮祖细胞的影响:一项前瞻性、随机、交叉试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Aug 28;10(16):1646-1658. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.05.064.
4
P2Y12 Inhibitors for Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.P2Y12 抑制剂在非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征中的应用:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Tex Heart Inst J. 2023 May 1;50(3). doi: 10.14503/THIJ-22-7916.
5
Real-world evidence of switching P2Y12 receptor-inhibiting therapies to prasugrel after PCI in patients with ACS: results from EFF-K registry.在 ACS 患者 PCI 后转换为普拉格雷的 P2Y12 受体抑制剂治疗的真实世界证据:EFF-K 注册研究结果。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Jan 9;23(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-03034-5.
6
Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.替格瑞洛或普拉格雷在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用。
Circulation. 2020 Dec 15;142(24):2329-2337. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050244. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
7
Clopidogrel versus ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients aged 70 years or older with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (POPular AGE): the randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛或普拉格雷在 70 岁或以上非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者中的比较(POPular AGE):随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2020 Apr 25;395(10233):1374-1381. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30325-1.
8
Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes.替格瑞洛或普拉格雷在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 17;381(16):1524-1534. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908973. Epub 2019 Sep 1.
9
Comparison of prescription rates and clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention using different P2Y inhibitors in a large observational study.一项大型观察性研究比较了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者使用不同 P2Y 抑制剂的处方率和临床结局。
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Jan 1;274:21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
10
Comparison of P2Y12 Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndromes in the Australian Population.澳大利亚人群中急性冠脉综合征的 P2Y12 抑制剂比较。
Heart Lung Circ. 2022 Aug;31(8):1085-1092. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.03.007. Epub 2022 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Use cases of registry-based randomized controlled trials-A review of the registries' contributions and constraints.基于注册的随机对照试验的应用案例——对注册研究的贡献和限制的回顾。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Nov;17(11):e70072. doi: 10.1111/cts.70072.
2
Improving Registry-Based Observational Comparative Effectiveness Studies by Prospectively Incorporating Robust Treatment Preference Instruments.通过前瞻性纳入可靠的治疗偏好工具改进基于注册登记的观察性比较效果研究。
JACC Adv. 2023 Jul 19;2(5):100413. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100413. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
Potent P2Y Inhibitor Selection and De-escalation Strategies in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中强效P2Y抑制剂的选择与降阶梯策略:系统评价与荟萃分析
CJC Open. 2023 Dec 5;6(5):677-688. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.11.024. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Current Strategies to Guide the Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征的抗血小板治疗指导策略。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Apr 3;25(7):3981. doi: 10.3390/ijms25073981.
5
Maximizing the Value of Real-World Data and Real-World Evidence to Accelerate Healthcare Transformation in China: Summary of External Advisory Committee Meetings.最大化真实世界数据和真实世界证据的价值,加速中国医疗保健转型:外部顾问委员会会议总结。
Pharmaceut Med. 2024 May;38(3):157-166. doi: 10.1007/s40290-024-00520-3. Epub 2024 Apr 4.