Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Department of Neurology, Brooke Army Medical Center, JBSA-Fort Sam, Houston, Texas, USA.
Muscle Nerve. 2022 Aug;66(2):148-158. doi: 10.1002/mus.27649. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Consistency of differences between non-dystrophic myotonias over time measured by standardized clinical/patient-reported outcomes is lacking. Evaluation of longitudinal data could establish clinically relevant endpoints for future research.
Data from prospective observational study of 95 definite/clinically suspected non-dystrophic myotonia participants (six sites in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada) between March 2006 and March 2009 were analyzed. Outcomes included: standardized symptom interview/exam, Short Form-36, Individualized Neuromuscular Quality of Life (INQoL), electrophysiological short/prolonged exercise tests, manual muscle testing, quantitative grip strength, modified get-up-and-go test. Patterns were assigned as described by Fournier et al. Comparisons were restricted to confirmed sodium channelopathies (SCN4A, baseline, year 1, year 2: n = 34, 19, 13), chloride channelopathies (CLCN1, n = 32, 26, 18), and myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2, n = 9, 6, 2).
Muscle stiffness was the most frequent symptom over time (54.7%-64.7%). Eyelid myotonia and paradoxical handgrip/eyelid myotonia were more frequent in SCN4A. Grip strength and combined manual muscle testing remained stable. Modified get-up-and-go showed less warm up in SCN4A but remained stable. Median post short exercise decrement was stable, except for SCN4A (baseline to year 2 decrement difference 16.6% [Q1, Q3: 9.5, 39.2]). Fournier patterns type 2 (CLCN1) and 1 (SCN4A) were most specific; 40.4% of participants had a change in pattern over time. INQoL showed higher impact for SCN4A and DM2 with scores stable over time.
Symptom frequency and clinical outcome assessments were stable with defined variability in myotonia measures supporting trial designs like cross over or combined n-of-1 as important for rare disorders.
简介/目的:缺乏通过标准化临床/患者报告的结果来衡量时间上非营养不良性肌强直差异的一致性。对纵向数据的评估可以为未来的研究建立具有临床意义的终点。
对 2006 年 3 月至 2009 年 3 月期间在美国、英国和加拿大的六个地点进行的 95 例明确/疑似非营养不良性肌强直的前瞻性观察性研究的数据进行了分析。结果包括:标准化症状访谈/检查、36 项简短健康调查问卷(SF-36)、个体化神经肌肉生活质量量表(INQoL)、电生理短/长时间运动试验、手动肌肉测试、定量握力、改良起立行走测试。模式的分配如 Fournier 等人所述。比较仅限于确认的钠离子通道病(SCN4A,基线、第 1 年、第 2 年:n=34、19、13)、氯离子通道病(CLCN1,n=32、26、18)和肌强直性营养不良 2 型(DM2,n=9、6、2)。
随着时间的推移,肌肉僵硬是最常见的症状(54.7%-64.7%)。眼脸肌强直和反常握手/眼脸肌强直在 SCN4A 中更为常见。握力和综合手动肌肉测试保持稳定。改良起立行走测试在 SCN4A 中预热较少,但保持稳定。短运动后递减的中位数保持稳定,除了 SCN4A(从基线到第 2 年的递减差异为 16.6%[Q1、Q3:9.5、39.2])。Fournier 类型 2(CLCN1)和 1(SCN4A)模式最具特异性;40.4%的参与者随着时间的推移模式发生了变化。INQoL 显示 SCN4A 和 DM2 的影响更高,评分随时间保持稳定。
症状频率和临床结果评估稳定,肌强直测量的可变性定义支持交叉或组合 n-of-1 等设计,对于罕见疾病很重要。