• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病年轻患者和男性患者降糖药物起始治疗及时性较低,而降压药物起始治疗在各年龄和性别间相似:2015年至2020年的趋势

Less Timely Initiation of Glucose-Lowering Medication Among Younger and Male Patients With Diabetes and Similar Initiation of Blood Pressure-Lowering Medication Across Age and Sex: Trends Between 2015 and 2020.

作者信息

Ambrož Martina, de Vries Sieta T, Hoogenberg Klaas, Denig Petra

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Department of Internal Medicine, Martini Hospital, Groningen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2022 May 12;13:883103. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.883103. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2022.883103
PMID:35645811
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9133603/
Abstract

We aimed to assess trends in glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) thresholds at initiation of glucose- and blood pressure-lowering medication among patients with type 2 diabetes and assess the influence of age and sex on these trends. We used the Groningen Initiative to ANalyze Type 2 diabetes Treatment (GIANTT) primary care database. Patients initiating a first non-insulin glucose-lowering or any blood pressure-lowering medication between 2015 and 2020 with an HbA1c or SBP measurement in the 120 days before initiation were included. We used multilevel regression analyses adjusted for potential confounders to assess the influence of calendar year, age or sex, and the interaction between calendar year and age or sex on trends in HbA1c and SBP thresholds at initiation of medication. We included 2,671 and 2,128 patients in the analyses of HbA1c and SBP thresholds, respectively. The overall mean HbA1c threshold at initiation of glucose-lowering medication significantly increased from 7.4% in 2015 to 8.0% in 2020 ( < 0.001), and particularly in the younger age groups. Compared to patients ≥80 years, patients aged 60-69 years initiated medication at lower levels mainly in the early years. Patients <60 years and between 70-79 years initiated medication at similar levels as patients ≥80 years. Females initiated medication at lower levels than males throughout the study period ( < 0.001). The mean SBP threshold at initiation of blood pressure-lowering medication varied from 145 to 149 mmHg without a clear trend ( = 0.676). There were no differences in SBP thresholds between patients of different ages or sex. The rising trend in the HbA1c threshold for initiating glucose-lowering medication in the lower age groups was unexpected and requires further investigation. Males appear to receive less timely initiation of glucose-lowering medication than females. The lack of higher thresholds for the oldest age group or lower thresholds for the youngest age group in recent years is not in line with the age-related recommendations for personalized diabetes care and calls for health systems interventions.

摘要

我们旨在评估2型糖尿病患者开始使用降糖和降压药物时糖化血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)和收缩压(SBP)阈值的变化趋势,并评估年龄和性别对这些趋势的影响。我们使用了格罗宁根2型糖尿病治疗分析倡议(GIANTT)初级保健数据库。纳入了2015年至2020年间开始首次使用非胰岛素降糖药或任何降压药且在开始用药前120天内有HbA1c或SBP测量值的患者。我们使用针对潜在混杂因素进行调整的多水平回归分析,以评估历年、年龄或性别以及历年与年龄或性别的相互作用对开始用药时HbA1c和SBP阈值趋势的影响。在HbA1c和SBP阈值分析中,我们分别纳入了2671例和2128例患者。开始使用降糖药物时的总体平均HbA1c阈值从2015年的7.4%显著升至2020年的8.0%(<0.001),特别是在较年轻的年龄组中。与80岁及以上的患者相比,60 - 69岁的患者主要在早期以较低水平开始用药。60岁以下和70 - 79岁的患者开始用药的水平与80岁及以上的患者相似。在整个研究期间,女性开始用药的水平低于男性(<0.001)。开始使用降压药物时的平均SBP阈值在145至149 mmHg之间变化,无明显趋势(=0.676)。不同年龄或性别的患者在SBP阈值方面没有差异。较低年龄组开始使用降糖药物时HbA1c阈值的上升趋势出乎意料,需要进一步研究。男性开始使用降糖药物的时间似乎比女性更不及时。近年来,最高年龄组没有更高的阈值,最年轻年龄组也没有更低的阈值,这不符合与年龄相关的个性化糖尿病护理建议,需要卫生系统进行干预。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a651/9133603/42f04b468b10/fphar-13-883103-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a651/9133603/f66c4d6ca6d1/fphar-13-883103-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a651/9133603/42f04b468b10/fphar-13-883103-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a651/9133603/f66c4d6ca6d1/fphar-13-883103-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a651/9133603/42f04b468b10/fphar-13-883103-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Less Timely Initiation of Glucose-Lowering Medication Among Younger and Male Patients With Diabetes and Similar Initiation of Blood Pressure-Lowering Medication Across Age and Sex: Trends Between 2015 and 2020.糖尿病年轻患者和男性患者降糖药物起始治疗及时性较低,而降压药物起始治疗在各年龄和性别间相似:2015年至2020年的趋势
Front Pharmacol. 2022 May 12;13:883103. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.883103. eCollection 2022.
2
Trends in HbA thresholds for initiation of hypoglycemic agents: Impact of changed recommendations for older and frail patients.HbA 起始低血糖药物治疗阈值的趋势:对老年和虚弱患者推荐改变的影响。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021 Jan;30(1):37-44. doi: 10.1002/pds.5129. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
3
Changes in blood pressure thresholds for initiating antihypertensive medication in patients with diabetes: a repeated cross-sectional study focusing on the impact of age and frailty.血压阈值变化与糖尿病患者开始降压药物治疗:一项以年龄和衰弱为重点的重复横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 10;10(9):e037694. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037694.
4
Real-world impact on monthly glucose-lowering medication cost, HbA, weight, and polytherapy after initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist.启动胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂后对每月降糖药物成本、糖化血红蛋白(HbA)、体重和联合治疗的实际影响。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020 Jan-Feb;60(1):31-38.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2019.09.001. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
5
Identifying targets to improve treatment in type 2 diabetes; the Groningen Initiative to aNalyse Type 2 diabetes Treatment (GIANTT) observational study.确定靶点以改善 2 型糖尿病的治疗;格罗宁根分析 2 型糖尿病治疗(GIANTT)观察性研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Oct;19(10):1078-86. doi: 10.1002/pds.2023.
6
HbA1c response after insulin initiation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in real life practice: Identifying distinct subgroups.在真实临床实践中,2 型糖尿病患者起始胰岛素治疗后的 HbA1c 反应:确定不同亚组。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Aug;20(8):1957-1964. doi: 10.1111/dom.13332. Epub 2018 May 24.
7
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.糖尿病护理质量改进策略:对成年糖尿病患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
8
Discontinuation of diabetes medication in the 10 years before death in Denmark: a register-based study.丹麦一项基于登记的研究:死亡前 10 年内停止使用糖尿病药物的情况。
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021 Sep;2(9):e561-e570. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00170-7. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
9
Older Age, Polypharmacy, and Low Systolic Blood Pressure Are Associated With More Hypotension-Related Adverse Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Antihypertensives.在接受抗高血压药物治疗的2型糖尿病患者中,高龄、多种药物联合使用和收缩压降低与更多的低血压相关不良事件有关。
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Sep 24;12:728911. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.728911. eCollection 2021.
10
Effects of blood pressure-lowering treatment on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality: 13 - benefits and adverse events in older and younger patients with hypertension: overview, meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses of randomized trials.降压治疗对心血管结局和死亡率的影响:13 - 老年和年轻高血压患者的获益和不良反应:随机试验的概述、荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析。
J Hypertens. 2018 Aug;36(8):1622-1636. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001787.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of the COVID pandemic on primary care diabetes services in the UK: A cross-sectional national survey of views of health professionals delivering diabetes care.新冠疫情对英国基层医疗糖尿病服务的影响:一项关于提供糖尿病护理的卫生专业人员观点的全国性横断面调查。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2022 Apr;16(2):257-263. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2021.12.015. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
2
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Glycemic Control and Blood Pressure Control in Patients with Diabetes in Japan.COVID-19 大流行对日本糖尿病患者血糖控制和血压控制的影响。
Intern Med. 2022;61(1):37-48. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.8041-21. Epub 2022 Jan 1.
3
Patient delay prior to care-seeking in acute myocardial infarction during the outbreak of the coronavirus SARS-CoV2 pandemic.
在冠状病毒SARS-CoV2大流行期间急性心肌梗死患者寻求治疗前的就医延迟。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2021 Nov 28;20(8):752-759. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvab087.
4
Estimated impact of COVID-19 on preventive care service delivery: an observational cohort study.估算 COVID-19 对预防保健服务提供的影响:一项观察性队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 16;21(1):1107. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07131-7.
5
Older Age, Polypharmacy, and Low Systolic Blood Pressure Are Associated With More Hypotension-Related Adverse Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Antihypertensives.在接受抗高血压药物治疗的2型糖尿病患者中,高龄、多种药物联合使用和收缩压降低与更多的低血压相关不良事件有关。
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Sep 24;12:728911. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.728911. eCollection 2021.
6
The Impact of Choosing Wisely Interventions on Low-Value Medical Services: A Systematic Review.明智选择干预措施对低价值医疗服务的影响:系统评价。
Milbank Q. 2021 Dec;99(4):1024-1058. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12531. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
7
The Lancet women and cardiovascular disease Commission: reducing the global burden by 2030.柳叶刀妇女与心血管疾病委员会:到 2030 年降低全球负担。
Lancet. 2021 Jun 19;397(10292):2385-2438. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00684-X. Epub 2021 May 16.
8
Sex Disparities in Cardiovascular Risk Factor Assessment and Screening for Diabetes-Related Complications in Individuals With Diabetes: A Systematic Review.性别差异在心血管风险因素评估和糖尿病相关并发症筛查中的作用:系统评价。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 30;12:617902. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.617902. eCollection 2021.
9
Factors associated with potential over- and undertreatment of hyperglycaemia and annual measurement of HbA in type 2 diabetes in norwegian general practice.挪威全科医疗中与 2 型糖尿病患者高血糖潜在过度和治疗不足以及 HbA1c 年度检测相关的因素。
Diabet Med. 2021 Aug;38(8):e14500. doi: 10.1111/dme.14500. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
10
10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: .10. 心血管疾病与风险管理: 。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S125-S150. doi: 10.2337/dc21-S010.