• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于制度信任视角的中国扶贫农产品网络购买意愿提升研究

Research on Improving Online Purchase Intention of Poverty-Alleviation Agricultural Products in China: From the Perspective of Institution-Based Trust.

作者信息

Wu Xianghua, Yuan Chao

机构信息

Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing, China.

The School of Information and Library Science, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 May 12;13:900328. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.900328. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.900328
PMID:35645936
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9133928/
Abstract

Poverty alleviation by consumption is a powerful way to help the poor people get rid of poverty, which plays a significant role in China's rural revitalization. However, the achievement of poverty alleviation by consumption mostly depends on government procurement, and the enthusiasm of customers to participate is low, facing the severe challenge of poor sustainability. Helping the poor is the most common motivation for customers to buy poverty-alleviation agricultural products (PAAP). However, as the negative events of poverty alleviation such as "tragic marketing" constantly appear in news reports, customers' trust in sellers has been seriously damaged. The psychological protection system for fear of being cheated hinders customers' purchase intention. Therefore, we believed that trust is an important factor in enhancing customers' purchase intention of PAAP. Customers buy PAAP mainly through online channels, and institution-based trust is the most important way to generate trust in online channels. Thus, this study investigated the institutional mechanisms that affect customers' trust in the sellers of PAAP and discussed the influence of trust on the online purchase intention of PAAP. Data were obtained through a questionnaire survey and tested empirically. The results showed that the effectiveness of the user feedback mechanism, platform supervision mechanism, product traceability mechanism, and product certification mechanism can enhance customers' purchase intention by enhancing their trust. Individual trust tendency positively regulated the relationship between the effectiveness of institutional mechanisms and consumer trust. The conclusion can not only provide new theoretical guidance for the practice of poverty alleviation by consumption in China but also offer new ideas for the poverty alleviation undertakings in other countries.

摘要

消费扶贫是帮助贫困人口脱贫的有力途径,在中国乡村振兴中发挥着重要作用。然而,消费扶贫的成效大多依赖政府采购,消费者参与积极性低,面临可持续性差的严峻挑战。帮助贫困人口是消费者购买扶贫农产品的最常见动机。然而,随着“悲情营销”等扶贫负面事件不断出现在新闻报道中,消费者对卖家的信任受到严重损害。害怕受骗的心理保护机制阻碍了消费者的购买意愿。因此,我们认为信任是增强消费者购买扶贫农产品意愿的重要因素。消费者主要通过网络渠道购买扶贫农产品,基于制度的信任是在网络渠道产生信任的最重要方式。因此,本研究调查了影响消费者对扶贫农产品卖家信任的制度机制,并探讨了信任对扶贫农产品网络购买意愿的影响。通过问卷调查获取数据并进行实证检验。结果表明,用户反馈机制、平台监管机制、产品可追溯机制和产品认证机制的有效性能够通过增强消费者信任来提高其购买意愿。个体信任倾向正向调节制度机制有效性与消费者信任之间的关系。该结论不仅能为中国消费扶贫实践提供新的理论指导,也能为其他国家的扶贫事业提供新思路。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b404/9133928/1b3ffb3c1641/fpsyg-13-900328-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b404/9133928/1b3ffb3c1641/fpsyg-13-900328-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b404/9133928/1b3ffb3c1641/fpsyg-13-900328-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Research on Improving Online Purchase Intention of Poverty-Alleviation Agricultural Products in China: From the Perspective of Institution-Based Trust.基于制度信任视角的中国扶贫农产品网络购买意愿提升研究
Front Psychol. 2022 May 12;13:900328. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.900328. eCollection 2022.
2
Corrigendum: Research on Improving Online Purchase Intention of Poverty-Alleviation Agricultural Products in China: From the Perspective of Institution-Based Trust.勘误:中国扶贫农产品网络购买意愿提升研究:基于制度信任的视角
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 24;13:949121. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.949121. eCollection 2022.
3
How do environmental values impact green product purchase intention? The moderating role of green trust.环境价值观如何影响绿色产品购买意愿?绿色信任的调节作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Sep;28(33):46020-46034. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13946-y. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
4
Risk, Trust, and Emotion in Online Pharmacy Medication Purchases: Multimethod Approach Incorporating Customer Self-Reports, Facial Expressions, and Neural Activation.在线药房购药中的风险、信任与情感:结合顾客自我报告、面部表情和神经激活的多方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Dec 25;7:e48850. doi: 10.2196/48850.
5
Impact of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Gaming Elements on Online Purchase Intention.内在和外在游戏元素对在线购买意愿的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 9;13:885619. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.885619. eCollection 2022.
6
The impact of brand trust on consumers' behavior toward agricultural products' regional public brand.品牌信任对消费者针对农产品区域公用品牌行为的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 30;18(11):e0295133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295133. eCollection 2023.
7
Green factors stimulating the purchase intention of innovative luxury organic beauty products: Implications for sustainable development.绿色因素刺激创新奢华有机美容产品购买意愿:对可持续发展的启示。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jan 1;301:113899. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113899. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
8
Influence of Interpersonal and Institutional Trust on the Participation Willingness of Farmers in E-Commerce Poverty Alleviation.人际信任与制度信任对农户参与电商扶贫意愿的影响
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 29;12:727644. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.727644. eCollection 2021.
9
Customer review or influencer endorsement: which one influences purchase intention more?顾客评价还是有影响力人士的推荐:哪一个对购买意愿的影响更大?
Heliyon. 2020 Nov 20;6(11):e05543. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05543. eCollection 2020 Nov.
10
The Nexus between Green Perceived Quality, Green Satisfaction, Green Trust, and Customers' Green Behavioral Intentions in Eco-Friendly Hotels: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.生态友好型酒店中绿色感知质量、绿色满意度、绿色信任与顾客绿色行为意向的关联:结构方程建模方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 3;19(23):16195. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316195.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolutionary Game Analysis of Low Carbon Production Behaviour of Farmers, Government and Consumers in Food Safety Source Governance.食品安全源头治理中农户、政府与消费者低碳生产行为的演化博弈分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 26;19(19):12211. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912211.

本文引用的文献

1
Consumers' Decision-Making Process on Social Commerce Platforms: Online Trust, Perceived Risk, and Purchase Intentions.社交商务平台上消费者的决策过程:在线信任、感知风险与购买意愿
Front Psychol. 2020 May 15;11:890. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00890. eCollection 2020.