Suppr超能文献

肝硬化患者静息能量消耗的评估。

Assessment of resting energy expenditure in patients with cirrhosis.

作者信息

Ferreira Shaiane, Marroni Cláudio Augusto, Stein Jessica Taina, Rayn Roberta, Henz Ana Cristhina, Schmidt Natália P, Carteri Randhall B, Fernandes Sabrina Alves

机构信息

Postgraduate Program in Hepatology, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre 90050-170, Brazil.

Department of Nutrition, Centro Universitário Metodista - IPA, Porto Alegre 90420-060, Brazil.

出版信息

World J Hepatol. 2022 Apr 27;14(4):802-811. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i4.802.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition affects 20% to 50% of patients with cirrhosis. It may be associated with serious complications and has a direct impact on prognosis. Resting energy expenditure (REE) is an important parameter to guide the optimization of therapy and recovery of nutritional status in patients with cirrhosis. However, the REE of patients with cirrhosis is still unclear, casting doubt upon the optimal nutritional management approach.

AIM

To identify the best method that predicts the REE of cirrhotic patients, using indirect calorimetry (IC) as the gold standard.

METHODS

An observational study was performed on 90 patients with cirrhosis. REE was assessed by IC, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and predictive formulas, which were compared using Bland-Altman plots and the Student's -test.

RESULTS

REE values measured by IC (1607.72 ± 257.4 kcal) differed significantly from those determined by all other methods (BIA: 1790.48 ± 352.1 kcal; Harris & Benedict equation: 2373.54 ± 254.9 kcal; IOM equation: 1648.95 ± 185.6 kcal; Cunningham equation: 1764.29 ± 246.2 kcal), except the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, World Health Organization, and United Nations University (FAO/WHO/UNU) (1616.07 ± 214.6 kcal) and McArdle (1611.30 ± 241.8 kcal) equations. We found no significant association when comparing IC and 24-h dietary recall among different Child-Pugh classes of cirrhosis.

CONCLUSION

The IOM and FAO/WHO/UNU equations have the best agreement with the CI. These results indicate a possibility of different tools for the clinical practice on cirrhotic patients.

摘要

背景

营养不良影响20%至50%的肝硬化患者。它可能与严重并发症相关,并直接影响预后。静息能量消耗(REE)是指导肝硬化患者治疗优化和营养状况恢复的重要参数。然而,肝硬化患者的REE仍不明确,这使得最佳营养管理方法受到质疑。

目的

以间接测热法(IC)作为金标准,确定预测肝硬化患者REE的最佳方法。

方法

对90例肝硬化患者进行了一项观察性研究。通过IC、生物电阻抗分析(BIA)和预测公式评估REE,并使用Bland-Altman图和学生t检验进行比较。

结果

IC测量的REE值(1607.72±257.4千卡)与所有其他方法测定的值(BIA:1790.48±352.1千卡;Harris&Benedict方程:2373.54±254.9千卡;IOM方程:1648.95±185.6千卡;Cunningham方程:1764.29±246.2千卡)有显著差异,但联合国粮食及农业组织、世界卫生组织和联合国大学(FAO/WHO/UNU)方程(1616.07±214.6千卡)和McArdle方程(1611.30±241.8千卡)除外。在比较不同Child-Pugh分级的肝硬化患者的IC和24小时饮食回顾时,我们未发现显著关联。

结论

IOM和FAO/WHO/UNU方程与CI的一致性最佳。这些结果表明,对于肝硬化患者的临床实践,可能有不同的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28d1/9099101/7eb01207af4b/WJH-14-802-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验