Poyer Fiona, Füreder Anna, Holter Wolfgang, Peters Christina, Boztug Heidrun, Dworzak Michael, Engstler Gernot, Friesenbichler Waltraud, Köhrer Stefan, Lüftinger Roswitha, Ronceray Leila, Witt Volker, Pichler Herbert, Attarbaschi Andishe
Department of Pediatric Haematology and Oncology, St. Anna Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Pediatric Haematology and Oncology, St. Anna Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Ther Adv Hematol. 2022 May 23;13:20406207221099468. doi: 10.1177/20406207221099468. eCollection 2022.
While survival rates in paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) nowadays exceed 90%, systemic ALL relapse, especially after haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), is associated with a poor outcome. As there is currently no standardized treatment for this situation, individualized treatment is often pursued. Exemplified by two clinical scenarios, the aim of this article is to highlight the challenge for treating physicians to find a customized treatment strategy integrating the role of conventional chemotherapy, immunotherapeutic approaches and second allogeneic HSCT. Case 1 describes a 2-year-old girl with an early isolated bone marrow relapse of an infant -rearranged B-cell precursor ALL after allogeneic HSCT. After bridging chemotherapy and lymphodepleting chemotherapy, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells (tisagenlecleucel) were administered for remission induction, followed by a second HSCT from the 9/10 human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched mother. Case 2 describes a 16-year-old girl with a late, isolated bone marrow relapse of B-cell precursor ALL after allogeneic HSCT who experienced severe treatment toxicities including stage IV renal insufficiency. After dose-reduced bridging chemotherapy, CAR T-cells (tisagenlecleucel) were administered for remission induction despite a CD19 clone without prior lymphodepletion due to enhanced persisting toxicity. This was followed by a second allogeneic HSCT from the haploidentical mother. While patient 2 relapsed around Day + 180 after the second HSCT, patient 1 is still in complete remission >360 days after the second HSCT. Both cases demonstrate the challenges associated with systemic ALL relapse after first allogeneic HSCT, including chemotherapy-resistant disease and persisting organ damage inflicted by previous therapy. Immunotherapeutic approaches, such as CAR T-cells, can induce remission and enable a second allogeneic HSCT. However, optimal therapy for systemic ALL relapse after first HSCT remains to be defined.
如今,小儿急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)的生存率超过了90%,但ALL的全身复发,尤其是在造血干细胞移植(HSCT)后复发,预后较差。由于目前针对这种情况尚无标准化治疗方案,因此常采用个体化治疗。本文以两个临床病例为示例,旨在强调治疗医生在寻找定制化治疗策略时所面临的挑战,该策略需整合传统化疗、免疫治疗方法以及第二次异基因HSCT的作用。病例1描述了一名2岁女孩,在异基因HSCT后早期出现婴儿型重排B细胞前体ALL的孤立骨髓复发。在进行桥接化疗和淋巴细胞清除化疗后,给予嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞(tisagenlecleucel)进行缓解诱导,随后接受来自9/10人类白细胞抗原(HLA)匹配母亲的第二次HSCT。病例2描述了一名16岁女孩,在异基因HSCT后晚期出现B细胞前体ALL的孤立骨髓复发,她经历了包括IV期肾功能不全在内的严重治疗毒性。在剂量减少的桥接化疗后,尽管由于持续毒性增强导致未进行预先淋巴细胞清除的CD19克隆,但仍给予CAR T细胞(tisagenlecleucel)进行缓解诱导。随后接受来自单倍体母亲的第二次异基因HSCT。患者2在第二次HSCT后约第180天复发,而患者1在第二次HSCT后>360天仍处于完全缓解状态。这两个病例均显示了首次异基因HSCT后ALL全身复发所带来的挑战,包括化疗耐药性疾病以及先前治疗造成的持续性器官损伤。免疫治疗方法,如CAR T细胞,可诱导缓解并使第二次异基因HSCT成为可能。然而,首次HSCT后ALL全身复发的最佳治疗方案仍有待确定。