基于国际互联网的干预研究中的伦理审查程序
Ethical review procedures in international internet-based intervention studies.
作者信息
Looijmans Anne, Spahrkäs Simon S, Sanderman Robbert, Hagedoorn Mariët
机构信息
University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Health Psychology, A. Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, the Netherlands.
Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, the Netherlands.
出版信息
Internet Interv. 2021 Nov 26;28:100487. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100487. eCollection 2022 Apr.
Abstract
International internet-based studies could be accessible by participants from various countries worldwide. However, the jurisdiction of research ethics committees (RECs) or institutional review boards (IRBs) is bound to geographical state or country borders. How can researchers deal with the geographical boundaries in the jurisdiction of RECs/IRBs versus the worldwide, open character of international internet-based research? Should ethical approval be sought in each country where participants will be recruited? In this paper, we want to share our challenges in setting up the ethical review procedures in an international internet-based mHealth intervention study, to further the discussion on ethical procedures in internet-based research.
摘要
基于国际互联网的研究可供来自全球各国的参与者参与。然而，研究伦理委员会（REC）或机构审查委员会（IRB）的管辖权受地理州或国界的限制。研究人员如何应对REC/IRB管辖权方面的地理界限与基于国际互联网研究的全球开放性之间的矛盾？是否应该在招募参与者的每个国家都寻求伦理批准？在本文中，我们希望分享在开展一项基于国际互联网的移动健康干预研究时建立伦理审查程序所面临的挑战，以推动关于基于互联网研究的伦理程序的讨论。
相似文献
1
Ethical review procedures in international internet-based intervention studies.基于国际互联网的干预研究中的伦理审查程序
Internet Interv. 2021 Nov 26;28:100487. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100487. eCollection 2022 Apr.
2
Empowering local research ethics review of antibacterial mass administration research.赋权地方研究伦理审查机构对抗菌药物集体用药研究进行审查。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2022 Sep 28;11(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s40249-022-01031-6.
3
Ranking Research Methodology by Risk - a cross-sectional study to determine the opinion of research ethics committee members.风险分级研究方法：一项横断面研究，旨在确定研究伦理委员会成员的意见。
Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 1;12(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02295-1.
4
Confidence of IRB/REC Members in Their Assessments of Human Research Risk: A Study of IRB/REC Decision Making in Action.机构审查委员会/伦理审查委员会成员对其人类研究风险评估的信心：一项关于机构审查委员会/伦理审查委员会实际决策的研究
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 Jul;12(3):140-149. doi: 10.1177/1556264617710386. Epub 2017 May 30.
5
Research ethics committees and post-approval activities: a qualitative study on the perspectives of European research ethics committee representatives.研究伦理委员会与批准后活动：一项关于欧洲研究伦理委员会代表观点的定性研究
Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Nov;38(11):1897-1907. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2115773. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
6
Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.美国机构审查委员会和南非研究伦理委员会成员对HIV疫苗试验伦理审查过程和内容的看法。
Dev World Bioeth. 2008 Dec;8(3):207-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2007.00189.x.
7
Research Ethics Committees' Oversight of Biomedical Research in South Africa: A Thematic Analysis of Ethical Issues Raised During Ethics Review of Non-Expedited Protocols.南非研究伦理委员会对生物医学研究的监督：对非快速审查方案伦理审查期间提出的伦理问题的主题分析。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2019 Apr;14(2):107-116. doi: 10.1177/1556264618824921. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
8
The Emergence of Clinical Research Ethics Consultation: Insights From a National Collaborative.临床研究伦理咨询的出现：来自国家合作的见解。
Am J Bioeth. 2018 Jan;18(1):39-45. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1401156.
9
Research ethics committees: a regional approach.研究伦理委员会：一种区域性方法。
Theor Med Bioeth. 1999 Apr;20(2):161-79. doi: 10.1023/a:1009989104496.
10
Data and tissue research without patient consent: A qualitative study of the views of research ethics committees in New Zealand.未经患者同意的数据与组织研究：对新西兰研究伦理委员会观点的定性研究
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2018 Jul-Sep;9(3):143-153. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1518938.
引用本文的文献
1
A French-Language Web-Based Intervention Targeting Prolonged Grief Symptoms in People Who Are Bereaved and Separated: Randomized Controlled Trial.面向丧亲和离异人群的延长哀伤症状的法语网络干预：随机对照试验。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Oct 16;8:e57294. doi: 10.2196/57294.
2
Internal Psychometric Validation of an International Burden of Illness Survey for Idiopathic Multicentric Castleman Disease.特发性多中心Castleman病国际疾病负担调查的内部心理测量学验证
Oncol Ther. 2024 Sep;12(3):491-508. doi: 10.1007/s40487-024-00293-4. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
3
Designing, Conducting, and Reporting Survey Studies: A Primer for Researchers.设计、实施和报告调查研究：研究人员入门指南。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Dec 11;38(48):e403. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e403.
4
Long Covid requires a global response centred on equity and dialogue.长新冠需要以公平和对话为中心的全球应对。
Glob Health Action. 2023 Dec 31;16(1):2244757. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2244757.
5
The Blursday database as a resource to study subjective temporalities during COVID-19.将 Blursday 数据库作为研究 COVID-19 期间主观时间性的资源。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Nov;6(11):1587-1599. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01419-2. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
6
How does the Untire app alleviate cancer-related fatigue? A longitudinal mediation analysis.Untire 应用程序如何缓解癌症相关疲劳？一项纵向中介分析。
Psychooncology. 2022 Jun;31(6):970-977. doi: 10.1002/pon.5886. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
本文引用的文献
1
Characterizing long COVID in an international cohort: 7 months of symptoms and their impact.在一个国际队列中对长期新冠进行特征描述：7个月的症状及其影响。
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Aug;38:101019. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101019. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
2
Recruiting participants for an international mHealth study via Facebook Ads: Experiences from the Untire App RCT.通过脸书广告为一项国际移动健康研究招募参与者：来自Untire应用程序随机对照试验的经验
Internet Interv. 2021 Jan 7;23:100362. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100362. eCollection 2021 Mar.
3
Beating Cancer-Related Fatigue With the Untire Mobile App: Protocol for a Waiting List Randomized Controlled Trial.使用Untire移动应用程序战胜癌症相关疲劳：一项等待名单随机对照试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Feb 14;9(2):e15969. doi: 10.2196/15969.
4
Mild cognitive impairment and sedentary behavior: A multinational study.轻度认知障碍与久坐行为：一项跨国研究。
Exp Gerontol. 2018 Jul 15;108:174-180. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
5
Online prevention of postpartum depression for Spanish- and English-speaking pregnant women: A pilot randomized controlled trial.针对说西班牙语和英语的孕妇的产后抑郁在线预防：一项随机对照试验试点研究
Internet Interv. 2015 Sep 1;2(3):257-265. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2015.06.002.
6
The ethics and editorial challenges of internet-based research.基于互联网研究的伦理与编辑挑战。
BMC Med. 2014 Jul 15;12:124. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0124-3.
7
Research ethics committees: Need for harmonization at the national level, the global and Indian perspective.研究伦理委员会：国家层面协调的必要性，全球及印度视角
Perspect Clin Res. 2014 Apr;5(2):66-70. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.128022.
8
Multiple information sources and consequences of conflicting information about medicine use during pregnancy: a multinational Internet-based survey.孕期用药信息的多种来源及相互冲突信息的后果：一项基于互联网的多国调查
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Feb 20;16(2):e60. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2939.
9
Legislative regulation and ethical governance of medical research in different European Union countries.欧盟不同国家医学研究的立法监管与伦理治理
J Med Ethics. 2014 Jun;40(6):409-13. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101282. Epub 2013 May 10.
10
Multinational Internet-based survey of patient preference for newer oral or injectable Type 2 diabetes medication.关于患者对新型口服或注射用2型糖尿病药物偏好的跨国互联网调查。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2010 Nov 3;4:397-406. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S14477.
Zotero 插件