Suppr超能文献

两种不同形式的家庭联系干预对人格障碍患者家庭成员的有效性:在线形式与面对面形式。

Effectiveness of family connections intervention for family members of persons with personality disorders in two different formats: Online vs face-to-face.

作者信息

Guillén V, Fonseca-Baeza S, Fernández-Felipe I, Botella C, Baños R, García-Palacios A, Marco J H

机构信息

Universidad de Valencia, Spain.

Ciber Fisiopatologia Obesidad y Nutricion (CB06/03 Instituto Salud Carlos III), Spain.

出版信息

Internet Interv. 2022 Apr 2;28:100532. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100532. eCollection 2022 Apr.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Personality disorders (PD) have a serious impact on the lives of individuals who suffer from them and those around them. It is common for family members to experience high levels of burden, anxiety, and depression, and deterioration in their quality of life. It is curious that few interventions have been developed for family members of people with PD. However, Family Connections (FC) (Hoffman and Fruzzetti, 2005) is the most empirically supported intervention for family members of people with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD).

AIM

The aim of this study is to explore the effectiveness of online vs face-to-face FC. Given the current social constraints resulting from SARS-CoV-2, interventions have been delivered online and modified.

METHOD

This was a non-randomized pilot study with a pre-post evaluation and two conditions: The sample consisted of 45 family members distributed in two conditions: FC face-to-face (20) performed by groups before the pandemic, and FC online (25), performed by groups during the pandemic. All participants completed the evaluation protocol before and after the intervention.

RESULTS

There is a statistically significant improvement in levels of burden (η 2 = 0.471), depression, anxiety, and stress (η 2 = 0.279), family empowerment (η 2 = 0.243), family functioning (η 2 = 0.345), and quality of life (μ2 η 2 = 0.237). There were no differences based on the application format burden (η 2 = 0.134); depression, anxiety, and stress (η 2 = 0.087); family empowerment (η 2 = 0,27), family functioning (η 2 = 0.219); and quality of life (η 2 = 0.006), respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides relevant data about the possibility of implementing an intervention in a sample of family members of people with PD in an online format without losing its effectiveness. During the pandemic, and despite the initial reluctance of family members and the therapists to carry out the interventions online, this work shows the effectiveness of the results and the satisfaction of the family members. These results are particularly relevant in a pandemic context, where there was no possibility of providing help in other ways. All of this represents a great step forward in terms of providing psychological treatment.

摘要

引言

人格障碍(PD)对患者及其周围人的生活有着严重影响。家庭成员通常会承受高水平的负担、焦虑和抑郁,生活质量下降。奇怪的是,针对人格障碍患者家庭成员的干预措施很少。然而,家庭联结(FC)(霍夫曼和弗鲁泽蒂,2005年)是对边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者家庭成员最有实证支持的干预措施。

目的

本研究的目的是探讨在线FC与面对面FC的有效性。鉴于当前由严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)导致的社会限制,干预措施已改为在线提供并进行了调整。

方法

这是一项采用前后评估的非随机试点研究,有两种情况:样本由45名家庭成员组成,分为两种情况:大流行前由小组进行的面对面FC(20人),以及大流行期间由小组进行的在线FC(25人)。所有参与者在干预前后都完成了评估方案。

结果

在负担水平(η2 = 0.471)、抑郁、焦虑和压力(η2 = 0.279)、家庭赋权(η2 = 0.243)、家庭功能(η2 = 0.345)和生活质量(μ2 η2 = 0.237)方面有统计学上的显著改善。在应用形式方面,负担(η2 = 0.134)、抑郁、焦虑和压力(η2 = 0.087)、家庭赋权(η2 = 0.27)、家庭功能(η2 = 0.219)和生活质量(η2 = 0.006)方面没有差异。

结论

本研究提供了相关数据,表明在人格障碍患者家庭成员样本中以在线形式实施干预而不丧失其有效性的可能性。在大流行期间,尽管家庭成员和治疗师最初不愿进行在线干预,但这项工作显示了结果的有效性和家庭成员的满意度。这些结果在大流行背景下尤为重要,因为当时无法以其他方式提供帮助。所有这些在提供心理治疗方面都代表了巨大的进步。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5072/9136357/85426f0de04a/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验