Yu Jeong Il, Kang Wonseok, Yoo Gyu Sang, Goh Myung Ji, Sinn Dong Hyun, Gwak Geum-Youn, Paik Yong-Han, Choi Moon Seok, Lee Joon Hyeok, Koh Kwang Cheol, Paik Seung Woon, Hong Jung Yong, Lim Ho Yeong, Park Boram, Park Hee Chul
Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea.
Front Oncol. 2022 May 11;12:888755. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.888755. eCollection 2022.
This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and macroscopic tumor thrombosis who were treated with lenvatinib with or without combined liver-directed radiotherapy (LRT).
From the institutional registry, we enrolled 82 patients diagnosed with HCC involving macroscopic tumor thrombosis and treated with lenvatinib monotherapy (non-LRT group, n = 54, 65.9%) or lenvatinib in combination with LRT (LRT group, n = 28, 34.1%). Patients were classified into the LRT group if LRT was performed within 8 weeks of lenvatinib initiation.
During the median follow-up period of 5.4 (range 1.4 to 17.5) months, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of overall adverse events. Although there was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of overall response rate (32.1% vs. 20.4%, p = 0.15), a significantly higher treatment response was observed in the LRT group in terms of intrahepatic tumor response (67.9% vs. 20.4%, p < 0.001). In the LRT group, there was a slight difference in overall survival compared to the non-LRT group (64.1% in the LRT group vs. 37.7% in the non-LRT group at 12 months, hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-1.03; p = .06), although it did not reach a statistically significant level. However, progression-free survival (PFS, 67.2% in the LRT group vs. 35.0% in the non-LRT group at 6 months, HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.27-0.82; p = 0.008) and intrahepatic progression-free survival (IHPFS, 74.3% in the LRT group vs. 43.3% in the non-LRT group at 6 months, HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.25-0.81; p = 0.008) were significantly superior in the LRT group. This result was also reproduced in the multivariate analysis adjusted for α-fetoprotein, another significant prognostic factor in this study, and the well-known prognostic factors, namely the presence of main portal vein tumor thrombosis and albumin-bilirubin grade.
The combination of lenvatinib and LRT is relatively safe and effective in increasing the intrahepatic tumor response and improving PFS and IHPFS in patients with HCC and macroscopic tumor thrombosis.
本研究旨在比较接受乐伐替尼治疗的肝细胞癌(HCC)合并肉眼可见肿瘤血栓形成的患者,在联合或不联合肝脏定向放疗(LRT)时的临床结局。
从机构登记处,我们纳入了82例被诊断为HCC合并肉眼可见肿瘤血栓形成并接受乐伐替尼单药治疗(非LRT组,n = 54,65.9%)或乐伐替尼联合LRT治疗(LRT组,n = 28,34.1%)的患者。如果在乐伐替尼开始治疗的8周内进行了LRT,则将患者分类为LRT组。
在中位随访期5.4(范围1.4至17.5)个月期间,两组在总体不良事件方面无显著差异。尽管两组在总体缓解率方面无统计学差异(32.1%对20.4%,p = 0.15),但在肝内肿瘤反应方面,LRT组的治疗反应显著更高(67.9%对20.4%,p < 0.001)。在LRT组中,与非LRT组相比,总生存期略有差异(LRT组12个月时为64.1%,非LRT组为37.7%,风险比[HR]为0.54;95%置信区间[CI]为0.28 - 1.03;p = 0.06),尽管未达到统计学显著水平。然而,无进展生存期(PFS,LRT组6个月时为67.2%,非LRT组为35.0%,HR为0.47;95%CI为0.27 - 0.82;p = 0.008)和肝内无进展生存期(IHPFS,LRT组6个月时为74.3%,非LRT组为43.3%,HR为0.45;95%CI为0.25 - 0.81;p = 0.008)在LRT组中显著更优。在针对甲胎蛋白(本研究中的另一个重要预后因素)以及众所周知的预后因素(即主要门静脉肿瘤血栓形成的存在和白蛋白 - 胆红素分级)进行调整的多变量分析中,这一结果也得到了重现。
乐伐替尼与LRT联合应用在增加肝内肿瘤反应以及改善HCC合并肉眼可见肿瘤血栓形成患者的PFS和IHPFS方面相对安全有效。