From the Departments of Anesthesiology, and Cardiac Surgery, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Department of Intensive Care, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Anesth Analg. 2022 Oct 1;135(4):711-718. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006074. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
The United States spends more for intensive care units (ICUs) than do other high-income countries. We used time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) to analyze ICU costs for initiation of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) for respiratory failure to estimate how much of the higher ICU costs at 1 US site can be attributed to the higher prices paid to ICU personnel, and how much is caused by the US site's use of a higher cost staffing model. We accompanied our TDABC approach with narrative review of the ECMO programs, at Cedars-Sinai (Los Angeles), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (Paris), and The Alfred Hospital (Melbourne) from 2017 to 2019. Our primary outcome was daily ECMO cost, and we hypothesized that cost differences among the hospitals could be explained by the efficiencies and skill mix of involved clinicians and prices paid for personnel, equipment, and consumables. Our results are presented relative to Los Angeles' total personnel cost per VV ECMO patient day, indexed at 100. Los Angeles' total indexed daily cost of care was 147 (personnel: 100, durables: 5, and disposables: 42). Paris' total cost was 39 (26% of Los Angeles) (personnel: 12, durables: 1, and disposables: 26). Melbourne's total cost was 53 (36% of Los Angeles) (personnel: 32, durables: 2, and disposables: 19) (rounded). The higher personnel prices at Los Angeles explained only 26% of its much higher personnel costs than Paris, and 21% relative to Melbourne. Los Angeles' higher staffing levels accounted for 49% (36%), and its costlier mix of personnel accounted for 12% (10%) of its higher personnel costs relative to Paris (Melbourne). Unadjusted discharge rates for ECMO patients were 46% in Los Angeles (46%), 56% in Paris, and 52% in Melbourne. We found that personnel salaries explained only 30% of the higher personnel costs at 1 Los Angeles hospital. Most of the cost differential was caused by personnel staffing intensity and mix. This study demonstrates how TDABC may be used in ICU administration to quantify the savings that 1 US hospital could achieve by delivering the same quality of care with fewer and less-costly mix of clinicians compared to a French and Australian site. Narrative reviews contextualized how the care models evolved at each site and helped identify potential barriers to change.
美国在重症监护病房(ICU)上的支出高于其他高收入国家。我们使用时间驱动作业成本法(TDABC)来分析因呼吸衰竭而启动静脉-静脉体外膜肺氧合(VV ECMO)的 ICU 成本,以估算 1 个美国站点的较高 ICU 成本中有多少可以归因于 ICU 人员的较高薪酬,以及有多少是由美国站点使用成本较高的人员配备模式造成的。我们在使用 TDABC 方法的同时,对 2017 年至 2019 年期间西奈山(洛杉矶)、巴黎皮提-萨尔佩特里尔医院(巴黎)和墨尔本阿尔弗雷德医院(墨尔本)的 ECMO 项目进行了叙述性审查。我们的主要结果是每天的 ECMO 成本,我们假设医院之间的成本差异可以通过参与临床医生的效率和技能组合以及人员、设备和耗材的薪酬来解释。我们的结果相对于洛杉矶每例 VV ECMO 患者的日总人员成本进行了呈现,索引为 100。洛杉矶的护理总成本为 147(人员:100,耐用:5,消耗品:42)。巴黎的总成本为 39(洛杉矶的 26%)(人员:12,耐用:1,消耗品:26)。墨尔本的总成本为 53(洛杉矶的 36%)(人员:32,耐用:2,消耗品:19)(四舍五入)。洛杉矶较高的人员薪酬仅解释了其人员成本比巴黎高得多的 26%,以及比墨尔本高得多的 21%。洛杉矶较高的人员配备水平占 49%(36%),其人员配备成本较高占其人员成本较高的 12%(10%),相对于巴黎(墨尔本)。ECMO 患者的未经调整出院率在洛杉矶为 46%(46%),在巴黎为 56%,在墨尔本为 52%。我们发现,人员工资仅解释了 1 家洛杉矶医院较高人员成本的 30%。成本差异的大部分是由人员配备强度和组合造成的。这项研究表明,TDABC 如何可在 ICU 管理中使用,以量化 1 家美国医院与法国和澳大利亚医院相比,通过使用更少和成本更低的临床医生组合提供相同质量的护理,可能实现的节省。叙述性审查使每个站点的护理模式如何演变的情况具体化,并有助于确定改变的潜在障碍。