Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
The Andrew M. and Jane M. Bursky Center for Human Immunology and Immunotherapy Programs, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Cancer Immunol Res. 2022 Aug 3;10(8):920-931. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-21-0865.
As a cell-based cancer vaccine, dendritic cells (DC), derived from peripheral blood monocytes or bone marrow (BM) treated with GM-CSF (GMDC), were initially thought to induce antitumor immunity by presenting tumor antigens directly to host T cells. Subsequent work revealed that GMDCs do not directly prime tumor-specific T cells, but must transfer their antigens to host DCs. This reduces their advantage over strictly antigen-based strategies proposed as cancer vaccines. Type 1 conventional DCs (cDC1) have been reported to be superior to GMDCs as a cancer vaccine, but whether they act by transferring antigens to host DCs is unknown. To test this, we compared antitumor responses induced by GMDCs and cDC1 in Irf8 +32-/- mice, which lack endogenous cDC1 and cannot reject immunogenic fibrosarcomas. Both GMDCs and cDC1 could cross-present cell-associated antigens to CD8+ T cells in vitro. However, injection of GMDCs into tumors in Irf8 +32-/- mice did not induce antitumor immunity, consistent with their reported dependence on host cDC1. In contrast, injection of cDC1s into tumors in Irf8 +32-/- mice resulted in their migration to tumor-draining lymph nodes, activation of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells, and rejection of the tumors. Tumor rejection did not require the in vitro loading of cDC1 with antigens, indicating that acquisition of antigens in vivo is sufficient to induce antitumor responses. Finally, cDC1 vaccination showed abscopal effects, with rejection of untreated tumors growing concurrently on the opposite flank. These results suggest that cDC1 may be a useful future avenue to explore for antitumor therapy. See related Spotlight by Hubert et al., p. 918.
作为一种基于细胞的癌症疫苗,树突状细胞(DC)来源于外周血单核细胞或骨髓(BM),经 GM-CSF(GMDC)处理,最初被认为通过将肿瘤抗原直接呈递给宿主 T 细胞来诱导抗肿瘤免疫。随后的工作表明,GMDC 并不能直接激活肿瘤特异性 T 细胞,而是必须将其抗原转移给宿主 DC。这降低了它们相对于作为癌症疫苗提出的严格基于抗原的策略的优势。已经报道 1 型传统 DC(cDC1)作为癌症疫苗优于 GMDC,但它们是否通过将抗原转移给宿主 DC 发挥作用尚不清楚。为了验证这一点,我们比较了 GMDC 和 cDC1 在 Irf8 +32-/- 小鼠中诱导的抗肿瘤反应,Irf8 +32-/- 小鼠缺乏内源性 cDC1,不能排斥免疫原性纤维肉瘤。GMDC 和 cDC1 均可在体外将细胞相关抗原交叉呈递给 CD8+T 细胞。然而,将 GMDC 注射到 Irf8 +32-/- 小鼠的肿瘤中并没有诱导抗肿瘤免疫,这与它们依赖宿主 cDC1 的报道一致。相比之下,将 cDC1 注射到 Irf8 +32-/- 小鼠的肿瘤中会导致它们迁移到肿瘤引流淋巴结,激活肿瘤特异性 CD8+T 细胞,并排斥肿瘤。肿瘤排斥不需要在体外对 cDC1 进行抗原加载,表明体内获取抗原足以诱导抗肿瘤反应。最后,cDC1 疫苗接种显示出远隔效应,同时排斥在对侧侧翼生长的未处理肿瘤。这些结果表明,cDC1 可能是抗肿瘤治疗的一个有前途的途径。请参阅相关的 Hubert 等人的焦点文章,第 918 页。