• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[不同级别临床管理的协调:巴西伯南布哥州累西腓初级和专科护理医生的观点]

[Coordination of clinical management between levels: the views of physicians in primary and specialized care in Recife, Pernambuco State, Brazil].

作者信息

Guerra Sofia, Martelli Petrônio José de Lima, Dubeux Luciana Santos, Marques Pedro, Samico Isabella Chagas

机构信息

Grupo de Estudos em Gestão e Avaliação em Saúde, Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira, Recife, Brasil.

Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brasil.

出版信息

Cad Saude Publica. 2022 May 30;38(5):e00262921. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XPT262921. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1590/0102-311XPT262921
PMID:35649101
Abstract

This study analyzed the views of physicians towards coordination of clinical management between different levels of care. This was a cross-sectional quantitative study using data from a survey of 182 physicians in primary healthcare (PHC) and specialized care in Recife, Pernambuco State, Brazil, in 2017. The results revealed significant differences in the physicians' experience. Considering referrals, the majority (81.32%) felt that PHC physicians referred patients to specialized care when necessary, and the proportion was higher in PHC physicians themselves (92.73%). As for agreement, two-thirds of PHC physicians (67.27%) reported that they agreed with the treatment prescribed by the specialist, while only 33.86% of the specialists agreed with the PHC physician. Concerning clinical responsibility, 89.09% of PHC physicians reported that they were clinically responsible for the patient, compared to only 43.31% of the specialists. As for recommendations, most of the interviewees (63.19%) felt that the specialists did not issue recommendations, and this proportion was higher among PHC physicians (81.82%). For waiting time, the majority (82.42%) felt that patients waited too long for appointments in specialized care, and the proportion was higher among PHC physicians (98.18%) than among specialists (75.59%). Only 16.36% of PHC physicians felt that waiting time was too long in PHC, compared to 38.58% of the medical specialists. The study's results are consistent with similar studies and highlight the need to strengthen coordination between levels of care to achieve effective integration in healthcare networks.

摘要

本研究分析了医生对不同医疗级别之间临床管理协调的看法。这是一项横断面定量研究,使用了2017年对巴西伯南布哥州累西腓市基层医疗(PHC)和专科护理领域182名医生的调查数据。结果显示医生的经验存在显著差异。在转诊方面,大多数(81.32%)认为基层医疗医生在必要时会将患者转诊至专科护理,基层医疗医生自身的这一比例更高(92.73%)。在意见一致方面,三分之二的基层医疗医生(67.27%)报告称他们同意专科医生开出的治疗方案,而只有33.86%的专科医生同意基层医疗医生的方案。关于临床责任,89.09%的基层医疗医生报告称他们对患者负有临床责任,相比之下专科医生中只有43.31%这样认为。在建议方面,大多数受访者(63.19%)认为专科医生没有给出建议,基层医疗医生中的这一比例更高(81.82%)。在等待时间方面,大多数(82.42%)认为患者在专科护理中等待预约的时间过长,基层医疗医生中的这一比例(98.18%)高于专科医生(75.59%)。只有16.36%的基层医疗医生认为基层医疗中的等待时间过长,而医疗专科医生中的这一比例为38.58%。该研究结果与类似研究一致,并强调需要加强不同医疗级别之间的协调,以实现医疗网络的有效整合。

相似文献

1
[Coordination of clinical management between levels: the views of physicians in primary and specialized care in Recife, Pernambuco State, Brazil].[不同级别临床管理的协调:巴西伯南布哥州累西腓初级和专科护理医生的观点]
Cad Saude Publica. 2022 May 30;38(5):e00262921. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XPT262921. eCollection 2022.
2
Experience with coordination of care between primary care physicians and specialists and related factors.初级保健医生和专家之间的协调护理经验及相关因素。
Cad Saude Publica. 2021 May 17;37(5):e00149520. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00149520. eCollection 2021.
3
[Continuity of care between care levels: experiences of users in a municipal health network].
Cad Saude Publica. 2022 Oct 10;38(9):e00047122. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XPT047122. eCollection 2022.
4
Reasons for encounter in primary health care in Brazil.巴西初级卫生保健中的就诊原因。
Fam Pract. 2020 Oct 19;37(5):648-654. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa029.
5
[Barriers and factors associated with the use of coordination mechanisms between levels of care in Mexico].[墨西哥不同医疗层级间协调机制使用相关的障碍与因素]
Cad Saude Publica. 2021 Apr 16;37(4):e00045620. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00045620. eCollection 2021.
6
Barriers to and enablers of the promotion of patient and family participation in primary healthcare nursing in Brazil, Germany and Spain: A qualitative study.巴西、德国和西班牙促进患者和家属参与初级保健护理的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2023 Dec;26(6):2396-2408. doi: 10.1111/hex.13843. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
7
[Awareness and use of mechanism for clinical coordination between levels in two health care networks in Pernambuco State, Brasil].[巴西伯南布哥州两个医疗保健网络中不同层级间临床协调机制的知晓与应用情况]
Cad Saude Publica. 2019 May 2;35(4):e00119318. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00119318.
8
Management and referral of patients with severe and poorly controlled asthma in primary care.基层医疗中重度及控制不佳哮喘患者的管理与转诊
Fam Pract. 2016 Dec;33(6):678-683. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw081. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
9
Primary care referrals of patients with potentially serious diseases to the emergency department or a quick diagnosis unit: a cross-sectional retrospective study.将患有潜在严重疾病的患者转诊至急诊科或快速诊断科室的基层医疗转诊情况:一项横断面回顾性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Apr 28;15:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-75.
10
Reasons for choice of referral physician among primary care and specialist physicians.基层医疗医生和专科医生转诊医生选择的原因。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 May;27(5):506-12. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1861-z. Epub 2011 Sep 16.