• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reasons for choice of referral physician among primary care and specialist physicians.基层医疗医生和专科医生转诊医生选择的原因。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 May;27(5):506-12. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1861-z. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
2
The pediatric primary-specialty care interface: how pediatricians refer children and adolescents to specialty care.儿科初级专科护理衔接:儿科医生如何将儿童和青少年转诊至专科护理。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Jul;153(7):705-14. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.153.7.705.
3
Primary Care Physicians' Decision Making Regarding Initial Oncology Referral for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.初级保健医生对癌症青少年和青年初始肿瘤转诊的决策。
J Adolesc Health. 2018 Feb;62(2):176-183. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
4
Mapping physician networks with self-reported and administrative data.用自报数据和行政数据绘制医生网络图谱。
Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct;46(5):1592-609. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01262.x. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
5
Variability in physician referral decisions.医生转诊决策的变异性。
J Am Board Fam Pract. 2002 Nov-Dec;15(6):473-80.
6
Assessment of Racial Disparities in Primary Care Physician Specialty Referrals.评估初级保健医生专业转诊中的种族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2029238. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29238.
7
The impact of international medical graduate status on primary care physicians' choice of specialist.国际医学毕业生身份对初级保健医生专科选择的影响。
Med Care. 2004 Aug;42(8):747-55. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000132352.06741.d4.
8
Evaluating the referral preferences and consultation requests of primary care physicians with otolaryngology - head and neck surgery.评估初级保健医生对头颈外科耳鼻喉科的转诊偏好和会诊请求。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Dec 29;44:57. doi: 10.1186/s40463-015-0114-2.
9
TeleConnect: digitally connecting physicians across the health care system.远程医疗:在医疗体系中实现医生的数字化互联。
Am J Manag Care. 2021 Jan 1;27(1):e4-e6. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88577.
10
Physician-reported barriers to referring cancer patients to specialists: prevalence, factors, and association with career satisfaction.医生报告的将癌症患者转介给专家的障碍:患病率、因素及与职业满意度的关系。
Cancer. 2015 Jan 1;121(1):113-22. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29019. Epub 2014 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Combining multiple sources of relationships in a network to advance understanding of physicians' beliefs regarding peer-effects.整合网络中多种关系来源,以加深对医生关于同伴效应信念的理解。
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2025 Mar 20. doi: 10.1007/s10742-025-00343-y.
2
New Patient Referral Patterns May Reflect Gender Biases in Orthopedics.新患者转诊模式可能反映出骨科领域的性别偏见。
Cureus. 2023 Jun 25;15(6):e40935. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40935. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
A Conceptual Framework for Optimizing the Equity of Hospital-Based Emergency Care: The Structure of Hospital Transfer Networks.优化基于医院的紧急护理公平性的概念框架:医院转院网络的结构。
Milbank Q. 2023 Mar;101(1):74-125. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12609. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
4
Performance on Patient Experience Measures of Former Chief Medical Residents as Physician Exemplars Chosen by the Profession.医生职业选择的前首席住院医生作为医师典范在患者体验测量上的表现。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Apr 1;183(4):350-359. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.0025.
5
Team Relationships and Performance: Evidence from Healthcare Referral Networks.团队关系与绩效:来自医疗转诊网络的证据
Manage Sci. 2022 May;68(5):3175-3973. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2021.4091. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
6
Beyond patient-sharing: Comparing physician- and patient-induced networks.超越患者共享:比较医生和患者诱导的网络。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2022 Sep;25(3):498-514. doi: 10.1007/s10729-022-09595-3. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
7
Tie Decay and Dissolution: Contentious Prescribing Practices in the Prescription Drug Epidemic.铁的衰变与溶解:处方药泛滥中存在争议的处方行为。
Organ Sci (Linthicum). 2021 Sep-Oct;32(5):1149-1173. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2020.1412. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
8
The Ontario Electronic Consultation (eConsult) Service: Cross-sectional Analysis of Utilization Data for 2 Models.安大略电子会诊(eConsult)服务:两种模式使用数据的横断面分析
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Apr 22;6(4):e32101. doi: 10.2196/32101.
9
How Referring Providers Choose Specialists for Their Patients: a Systematic Review.介绍医生如何为患者选择专家:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Oct;37(13):3444-3452. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07574-6. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
10
Determinants of physician networks: an ethnographic study examining the processes that inform patterns of collaboration and referral decision-making among physicians.医生网络的决定因素:一项人种志研究,考察影响医生之间合作模式和转诊决策过程的因素。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 5;11(1):e042334. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042334.

本文引用的文献

1
Health care spending and quality in year 1 of the alternative quality contract.替代质量合同的第 1 年的医疗保健支出和质量。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 8;365(10):909-18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1101416. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
2
Mapping physician networks with self-reported and administrative data.用自报数据和行政数据绘制医生网络图谱。
Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct;46(5):1592-609. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01262.x. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
3
Variation in cardiologists' propensity to test and treat: is it associated with regional variation in utilization?心脏病专家进行检测和治疗的倾向差异:这与使用情况的地区差异有关吗?
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 May;3(3):253-60. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.840009. Epub 2010 Apr 13.
4
Meaningful variation in performance: what does variation in quality tell us about improving quality?有意义的绩效变化:质量变化告诉我们如何提高质量?
Med Care. 2010 Feb;48(2):133-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181c15a6e.
5
Patient-centered care and preference-sensitive decision making.以患者为中心的护理与偏好敏感型决策
JAMA. 2009 Oct 28;302(16):1805-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1550.
6
A typology of specialists' clinical roles.专家临床角色的一种分类法。
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Jun 8;169(11):1062-8. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.114.
7
A systems approach to patient-centered care.一种以患者为中心的系统护理方法。
JAMA. 2006 Dec 20;296(23):2848-51. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.23.2848.
8
Identification and referral of patients with progressive CKD: a national study.进展性慢性肾脏病患者的识别与转诊:一项全国性研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2006 Aug;48(2):192-204. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.04.073.
9
Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care.系统评价:健康信息技术对医疗质量、效率和成本的影响
Ann Intern Med. 2006 May 16;144(10):742-52. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00125. Epub 2006 Apr 11.
10
Primary care physician specialty referral decision making: patient, physician, and health care system determinants.基层医疗医生专科转诊决策:患者、医生及医疗保健系统的决定因素
Med Decis Making. 2006 Jan-Feb;26(1):76-85. doi: 10.1177/0272989X05284110.

基层医疗医生和专科医生转诊医生选择的原因。

Reasons for choice of referral physician among primary care and specialist physicians.

机构信息

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 May;27(5):506-12. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1861-z. Epub 2011 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-011-1861-z
PMID:21922159
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3326096/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Specialty referral patterns can affect health care costs as well as clinical outcomes. For a given clinical problem, referring physicians usually have a choice of several physicians to whom they can refer. Once the decision to refer is made, the choice of individual physician may have important downstream effects.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the reasons why primary care and specialist physicians choose certain specific colleagues to refer to and how those reasons differ by specialty.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional Web-based survey supplemented with analysis of administrative claims data.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 616 physicians in office-based patient care specialties who were members of an academic physicians' organization and treated Medicare patients in 2006.

MAIN MEASURES

A total of 386 respondents (63% response rate) were presented with a "roster" of other physicians' names with whom we predicted they had a relationship based on sharing Medicare patients. Among physicians in their "professional network" (consisting of any listed physician with whom respondents acknowledged a professional relationship), respondents reported if they referred to those physicians, and if so, provided up to two reasons why they referred to that particular colleague. Using logistic regression, we examined the likelihood that different specialists would endorse specific reasons for referring to chosen colleagues.

KEY RESULTS

Primary care physicians (PCPs) initiated referrals to 66% of their "professional network" colleagues, while medical and surgical specialists initiated referrals to 49% and 52%, respectively (p < 0.001 for both versus PCPs). After adjustment, medical specialists were less likely than PCPs to cite ease of communication with colleagues (RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.49-0.91), and medical and surgical specialists were less likely than PCPs to cite "shares my medical record system" as a reason to refer (medical specialist RR = 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.40, surgical specialist RR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.05-0.78).

CONCLUSIONS

Specialists frequently initiate referrals, bypassing PCPs. In choosing specific physicians to refer to, PCPs are more often concerned with between-physician communication and patient access. Modifying referral practices among doctors may need to account for such patterns of behavior.

摘要

背景

专业转诊模式不仅会影响医疗保健成本,还会影响临床结果。对于特定的临床问题,转诊医生通常可以选择几位医生进行转诊。一旦做出转诊决定,选择具体的医生可能会产生重要的后续影响。

目的

探讨初级保健医生和专科医生选择特定同事转诊的原因,以及这些原因因专业而异的情况。

设计

基于网络的横断面调查,辅以行政索赔数据分析。

参与者

616 名在办公室接受患者治疗的专科医生,他们是一个学术医生组织的成员,并于 2006 年为 Medicare 患者提供治疗。

主要措施

共 386 名受访者(63%的回复率)收到了一份“名单”,其中列出了我们根据与 Medicare 患者共享情况预测他们有合作关系的其他医生的名字。在他们的“专业网络”(由任何被受访者承认有专业关系的名单上的医生组成)中,受访者报告他们是否会向这些医生转诊,如果转诊,提供他们转诊给特定同事的两个原因。我们使用逻辑回归,检验不同专科医生对选择同事的转诊原因的认同可能性。

主要结果

初级保健医生(PCPs)向其“专业网络”中 66%的同事发起转诊,而内科和外科专科医生的转诊比例分别为 49%和 52%(PCPs 之间的差异均为 p<0.001)。调整后,与 PCPs 相比,内科专科医生更不可能将与同事沟通的便利性作为转诊的原因(RR=0.69,95%CI=0.49-0.91),而内科和外科专科医生更不可能将“共享我的医疗记录系统”作为转诊的原因(内科专科医生 RR=0.13,95%CI 0.03-0.40,外科专科医生 RR=0.26,95%CI 0.05-0.78)。

结论

专科医生经常发起转诊,绕过初级保健医生。在选择具体转诊的医生时,PCPs 更关心医生之间的沟通和患者的可及性。在医生中改变转诊做法可能需要考虑到这种行为模式。