Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 May;27(5):506-12. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1861-z. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
Specialty referral patterns can affect health care costs as well as clinical outcomes. For a given clinical problem, referring physicians usually have a choice of several physicians to whom they can refer. Once the decision to refer is made, the choice of individual physician may have important downstream effects.
To examine the reasons why primary care and specialist physicians choose certain specific colleagues to refer to and how those reasons differ by specialty.
Cross-sectional Web-based survey supplemented with analysis of administrative claims data.
A total of 616 physicians in office-based patient care specialties who were members of an academic physicians' organization and treated Medicare patients in 2006.
A total of 386 respondents (63% response rate) were presented with a "roster" of other physicians' names with whom we predicted they had a relationship based on sharing Medicare patients. Among physicians in their "professional network" (consisting of any listed physician with whom respondents acknowledged a professional relationship), respondents reported if they referred to those physicians, and if so, provided up to two reasons why they referred to that particular colleague. Using logistic regression, we examined the likelihood that different specialists would endorse specific reasons for referring to chosen colleagues.
Primary care physicians (PCPs) initiated referrals to 66% of their "professional network" colleagues, while medical and surgical specialists initiated referrals to 49% and 52%, respectively (p < 0.001 for both versus PCPs). After adjustment, medical specialists were less likely than PCPs to cite ease of communication with colleagues (RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.49-0.91), and medical and surgical specialists were less likely than PCPs to cite "shares my medical record system" as a reason to refer (medical specialist RR = 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.40, surgical specialist RR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.05-0.78).
Specialists frequently initiate referrals, bypassing PCPs. In choosing specific physicians to refer to, PCPs are more often concerned with between-physician communication and patient access. Modifying referral practices among doctors may need to account for such patterns of behavior.
专业转诊模式不仅会影响医疗保健成本,还会影响临床结果。对于特定的临床问题,转诊医生通常可以选择几位医生进行转诊。一旦做出转诊决定,选择具体的医生可能会产生重要的后续影响。
探讨初级保健医生和专科医生选择特定同事转诊的原因,以及这些原因因专业而异的情况。
基于网络的横断面调查,辅以行政索赔数据分析。
616 名在办公室接受患者治疗的专科医生,他们是一个学术医生组织的成员,并于 2006 年为 Medicare 患者提供治疗。
共 386 名受访者(63%的回复率)收到了一份“名单”,其中列出了我们根据与 Medicare 患者共享情况预测他们有合作关系的其他医生的名字。在他们的“专业网络”(由任何被受访者承认有专业关系的名单上的医生组成)中,受访者报告他们是否会向这些医生转诊,如果转诊,提供他们转诊给特定同事的两个原因。我们使用逻辑回归,检验不同专科医生对选择同事的转诊原因的认同可能性。
初级保健医生(PCPs)向其“专业网络”中 66%的同事发起转诊,而内科和外科专科医生的转诊比例分别为 49%和 52%(PCPs 之间的差异均为 p<0.001)。调整后,与 PCPs 相比,内科专科医生更不可能将与同事沟通的便利性作为转诊的原因(RR=0.69,95%CI=0.49-0.91),而内科和外科专科医生更不可能将“共享我的医疗记录系统”作为转诊的原因(内科专科医生 RR=0.13,95%CI 0.03-0.40,外科专科医生 RR=0.26,95%CI 0.05-0.78)。
专科医生经常发起转诊,绕过初级保健医生。在选择具体转诊的医生时,PCPs 更关心医生之间的沟通和患者的可及性。在医生中改变转诊做法可能需要考虑到这种行为模式。