Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Int J Hyperthermia. 2022;39(1):751-757. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2079733.
To evaluate the biliary complication rates and efficacy of peribiliary tumor ablation using irreversible electroporation (IRE) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA).
This is a retrospective study of 42 consecutive patients with 44 peribiliary tumors (≤5 mm distance between the tumor margin and the primary or secondary bile duct). Data were collected between January 2014 and September 2020 from patients who underwent percutaneous liver ablation using IRE ( = 13) or RFA ( = 31).
The median length of follow-up was 23.1 months. The mean tumor size was 17.2 ± 5.2 mm in IRE 18.4 ± 7.0 mm in RFA (= .56). Complete tumor ablation was achieved in 100% with a significantly larger ablation zone in the IRE group (3.8 ± 0.3 cm 2.6 ± 0.6 cm, <.001). Significant biliary complications occurred in one patient (7.7%) of the IRE group and in five patients (16.1%) of the RFA group. Significant risk factors for biliary complications included the RFA procedure (HR 9.71, =.032) and proximity of the tumor to the bile duct (HR 0.63, =.048). The local tumor progression (LTP) rates were 7.7% (IRE) 21.5% (RFA) at 1 year, 23.1% (IRE) 32.7% (RFA) at 2 years and 23.1% (IRE) 44% (RFA) at 3 years, respectively (=.289).
The IRE and RFA procedures are safe and effective to treat peribiliary liver tumors. However, the RFA may have a higher risk of significant bile duct injury than IRE. The shorter distance between the bile duct and the tumor is a strong risk factor for biliary complications.
评估使用不可逆电穿孔(IRE)或射频消融(RFA)治疗胆管旁肿瘤的胆道并发症发生率和疗效。
这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 42 例 44 个胆管旁肿瘤患者(肿瘤边缘与主或次要胆管之间的距离≤5mm)。研究数据收集自 2014 年 1 月至 2020 年 9 月间接受经皮肝脏消融治疗的患者,其中接受 IRE 治疗的患者有 13 例(IRE 组),接受 RFA 治疗的患者有 31 例(RFA 组)。
中位随访时间为 23.1 个月。IRE 组的肿瘤平均直径为 17.2±5.2mm,RFA 组为 18.4±7.0mm(=0.56)。IRE 组的肿瘤完全消融率为 100%,消融区域显著大于 RFA 组(3.8±0.3cm 2.6±0.6cm 2,<.001)。IRE 组有 1 例(7.7%)患者和 RFA 组有 5 例(16.1%)患者发生严重胆道并发症。胆道并发症的显著危险因素包括 RFA 治疗(HR 9.71,=.032)和肿瘤与胆管的距离(HR 0.63,=.048)。1 年时的局部肿瘤进展(LTP)率分别为 IRE 组 7.7%(IRE)和 RFA 组 21.5%(RFA),2 年时分别为 23.1%(IRE)和 32.7%(RFA),3 年时分别为 23.1%(IRE)和 44%(RFA)(=0.289)。
IRE 和 RFA 治疗胆管旁肝肿瘤安全且有效,但 RFA 可能比 IRE 有更高的胆管损伤风险。胆管与肿瘤的距离越近,发生胆道并发症的风险越大。