Suppr超能文献

经不可逆电穿孔(IRE)或射频消融(RFA)消融胆管旁肿瘤后的胆道并发症和疗效。

Biliary complications and efficacy after ablation of peribiliary tumors using irreversible electroporation (IRE) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Int J Hyperthermia. 2022;39(1):751-757. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2079733.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the biliary complication rates and efficacy of peribiliary tumor ablation using irreversible electroporation (IRE) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 42 consecutive patients with 44 peribiliary tumors (≤5 mm distance between the tumor margin and the primary or secondary bile duct). Data were collected between January 2014 and September 2020 from patients who underwent percutaneous liver ablation using IRE ( = 13) or RFA ( = 31).

RESULTS

The median length of follow-up was 23.1 months. The mean tumor size was 17.2 ± 5.2 mm in IRE 18.4 ± 7.0 mm in RFA (= .56). Complete tumor ablation was achieved in 100% with a significantly larger ablation zone in the IRE group (3.8 ± 0.3 cm 2.6 ± 0.6 cm, <.001). Significant biliary complications occurred in one patient (7.7%) of the IRE group and in five patients (16.1%) of the RFA group. Significant risk factors for biliary complications included the RFA procedure (HR 9.71, =.032) and proximity of the tumor to the bile duct (HR 0.63, =.048). The local tumor progression (LTP) rates were 7.7% (IRE) 21.5% (RFA) at 1 year, 23.1% (IRE) 32.7% (RFA) at 2 years and 23.1% (IRE) 44% (RFA) at 3 years, respectively (=.289).

CONCLUSIONS

The IRE and RFA procedures are safe and effective to treat peribiliary liver tumors. However, the RFA may have a higher risk of significant bile duct injury than IRE. The shorter distance between the bile duct and the tumor is a strong risk factor for biliary complications.

摘要

目的

评估使用不可逆电穿孔(IRE)或射频消融(RFA)治疗胆管旁肿瘤的胆道并发症发生率和疗效。

材料与方法

这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 42 例 44 个胆管旁肿瘤患者(肿瘤边缘与主或次要胆管之间的距离≤5mm)。研究数据收集自 2014 年 1 月至 2020 年 9 月间接受经皮肝脏消融治疗的患者,其中接受 IRE 治疗的患者有 13 例(IRE 组),接受 RFA 治疗的患者有 31 例(RFA 组)。

结果

中位随访时间为 23.1 个月。IRE 组的肿瘤平均直径为 17.2±5.2mm,RFA 组为 18.4±7.0mm(=0.56)。IRE 组的肿瘤完全消融率为 100%,消融区域显著大于 RFA 组(3.8±0.3cm 2.6±0.6cm 2,<.001)。IRE 组有 1 例(7.7%)患者和 RFA 组有 5 例(16.1%)患者发生严重胆道并发症。胆道并发症的显著危险因素包括 RFA 治疗(HR 9.71,=.032)和肿瘤与胆管的距离(HR 0.63,=.048)。1 年时的局部肿瘤进展(LTP)率分别为 IRE 组 7.7%(IRE)和 RFA 组 21.5%(RFA),2 年时分别为 23.1%(IRE)和 32.7%(RFA),3 年时分别为 23.1%(IRE)和 44%(RFA)(=0.289)。

结论

IRE 和 RFA 治疗胆管旁肝肿瘤安全且有效,但 RFA 可能比 IRE 有更高的胆管损伤风险。胆管与肿瘤的距离越近,发生胆道并发症的风险越大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验