• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Injury Precipitating Tissue Loss and Time to Referral to a Vascular Center in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者的创伤性组织损失和向血管中心转诊的时间。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2023 Mar 1;30(3):287-298. doi: 10.5551/jat.63593. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
2
Predictive Factors for Limb Salvage and Foot Ulcer Recurrence in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia After Multidisciplinary Team Treatment: A 6-Year Japanese Single-Center Study.多学科团队治疗后慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者保肢和足部溃疡复发的预测因素:一项日本单中心 6 年研究。
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2023 Dec;22(4):722-732. doi: 10.1177/15347346211041429. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
3
Integration of palliative care consultation into the management of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia.将姑息治疗咨询纳入慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者的管理中。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Aug;78(2):454-463. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.12.069. Epub 2023 Apr 23.
4
Features of asymptomatic contralateral limb in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia.慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者无症状对侧肢体的特点。
J Cardiol. 2022 Jan;79(1):153-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.08.021. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
5
Wound, Ischemia, Foot Infection (Wifi) Classification System And Its Predictive Ability Concerning Amputation-Free Survival, Mortality And Major Limb Amputation In A Portuguese Population: A Single Center Experience.创面、缺血、足部感染(Wifi)分类系统及其对葡萄牙人群保肢生存、死亡率和主要肢体截肢的预测能力:单中心经验。
Port J Card Thorac Vasc Surg. 2024 Feb 9;30(4):51-58. doi: 10.48729/pjctvs.364.
6
Evaluation of global limb anatomic staging system for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia treated with autogenous bypass grafts.评价自体旁路移植治疗慢性肢体严重缺血患者的全球肢体解剖分期系统。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Nov;76(5):1347-1353.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.06.008. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
7
Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Is Associated With Higher Mortality and Limb Revascularization After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.慢性肢体威胁性缺血与经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的更高死亡率和肢体血运重建相关。
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Nov 15;207:202-205. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.08.114. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
8
Severe inframalleolar disease is an independent predictor of adverse limb outcomes after endovascular revascularization in chronic limb-threatening ischemia.严重的内踝下疾病是慢性肢体威胁性缺血血管腔内血运重建术后肢体不良结局的独立预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Mar;77(3):858-863. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.10.042. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
9
Limb-based patency as a measure of effective revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia.肢体通畅作为慢性肢体缺血性疾病有效血运重建的衡量指标。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Oct;76(4):997-1005.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.04.042. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
10
Clinical outcomes of chronic limb-threatening ischemia due to inflammatory nonatherosclerotic versus atherosclerotic etiologies undergoing revascularization.因炎症性非动脉粥样硬化与动脉粥样硬化病因导致的慢性肢体缺血性威胁进行血运重建后的临床结果。
Vasc Med. 2023 Aug;28(4):299-307. doi: 10.1177/1358863X231164659. Epub 2023 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Diabetes mellitus and peripheral artery disease.糖尿病与外周动脉疾病。
Diabetol Int. 2025 Jan 3;16(1):7-12. doi: 10.1007/s13340-024-00785-8. eCollection 2025 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Asymptomatic Low Ankle-Brachial Index with Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients after Acute Myocardial Infarction.无症状性低踝臂指数与急性心肌梗死后患者长期临床结局的关系。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2022 Jul 1;29(7):992-1000. doi: 10.5551/jat.62998. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
2
Evidence-Experience Gap and Future Perspective on the Treatment of Peripheral Artery Disease.证据-经验差距与外周动脉疾病治疗的未来展望。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2021 Dec 1;28(12):1251-1259. doi: 10.5551/jat.RV17058. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
3
Ambulatory Status Over Time after Revascularization in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者血运重建后随时间的门诊状态。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2022 Jun 1;29(6):866-880. doi: 10.5551/jat.62892. Epub 2021 May 27.
4
Reducing Nontraumatic Lower-Extremity Amputations by 20% by 2030: Time to Get to Our Feet: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association.到2030年将非创伤性下肢截肢率降低20%:是时候行动起来了:美国心脏协会的政策声明
Circulation. 2021 Apr 27;143(17):e875-e891. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000967. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
5
Evidence-Based Recommendations for Medical Management of Peripheral Artery Disease.循证推荐的外周动脉疾病医学管理建议。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2021 Jun 1;28(6):573-583. doi: 10.5551/jat.62778. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
6
Association of Age with Mortality Rate after Femoropopliteal Endovascular Therapy for Intermittent Claudication.年龄与间歇性跛行股腘动脉腔内治疗后死亡率的关系。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2022 Apr 1;29(4):474-481. doi: 10.5551/jat.62356. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
7
Impact of Longer Hemodialysis Vintage with Higher Serum Phosphorus Level on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Presenting Tissue Loss after Endovascular Therapy.长期血液透析且血清磷水平较高对腔内治疗后发生组织丢失的慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者临床结局的影响。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2022 Mar 1;29(3):370-378. doi: 10.5551/jat.60095. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
8
Clinical Impact of Measures for Frailty Severity in Poor-Risk Patients Undergoing Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.严重程度不同的衰弱症候群对慢性肢体严重缺血患者血运重建风险的临床影响。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2022 Feb 1;29(2):221-228. doi: 10.5551/jat.61481. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
9
Prognostic Value of the CHADS-VASc Score after Endovascular Therapy for Femoral Popliteal Artery Lesions.腔内治疗股腘动脉病变后 CHADS-VASc 评分的预后价值。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2021 Nov 1;28(11):1153-1160. doi: 10.5551/jat.60772. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
10
Risk Stratification for 2-Year Mortality in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Undergoing Endovascular Therapy.慢性肢体严重缺血患者血管内治疗后 2 年死亡率的风险分层。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2021 May 1;28(5):477-482. doi: 10.5551/jat.57711. Epub 2020 Jul 23.

慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者的创伤性组织损失和向血管中心转诊的时间。

Injury Precipitating Tissue Loss and Time to Referral to a Vascular Center in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

机构信息

Department of Diabetes Care Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine.

Cardiovascular Center, Kansai Rosai Hospital.

出版信息

J Atheroscler Thromb. 2023 Mar 1;30(3):287-298. doi: 10.5551/jat.63593. Epub 2022 Jun 2.

DOI:10.5551/jat.63593
PMID:35650020
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9981346/
Abstract

AIM

This study aimed to report injury precipitating tissue loss and to provide updated information on the time from tissue loss occurrence to referral to a vascular center for patients who developed chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) in Japan.

METHODS

We examined 450 patients who developed CLTI with tissue loss and were registered in a multicenter prospective study between October 2017 and June 2020. They were referred to the participating vascular centers for revascularization. Information on the injury precipitating tissue loss and time to referral was collected at registration. The severity of tissue loss was evaluated using the Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection classification.

RESULTS

Injury precipitating tissue loss was absent in 52.0% (95% confidence interval, 47.3%-56.6%) of the patients. The absence was associated with lower albumin levels and preserved pressure sensation. Although the time to referral was significantly shorter in cases without a history of prereferral revascularization, 16.8% (12.8%-20.7%) of the patients were referred to the vascular centers more than 3 months after tissue loss occurrence. Time to referral, but not the lack of a clear precipitant for tissue loss, was significantly associated with the severity of tissue loss.

CONCLUSION

A clear precipitant for tissue loss was often lacking, particularly in patients with low albumin levels and preserved pressure sensation. Delayed referral to a vascular center is still common.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在报告导致组织损伤的诱发因素,并为在日本发生慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)的患者提供关于从组织损伤发生到转至血管中心就诊的时间的最新信息。

方法

我们检查了在 2017 年 10 月至 2020 年 6 月期间参与多中心前瞻性研究的 450 例发生 CLTI 伴组织损失的患者。他们被转至参与的血管中心进行血运重建。在登记时收集了导致组织损失的损伤和转至血管中心就诊的时间信息。使用伤口、缺血和足部感染(Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection,WIfI)分类评估组织损失的严重程度。

结果

52.0%(95%置信区间,47.3%-56.6%)的患者不存在导致组织损失的诱发因素。不存在诱发因素与较低的白蛋白水平和保留的压力感觉有关。尽管没有预先转诊血运重建史的患者转诊时间明显较短,但仍有 16.8%(12.8%-20.7%)的患者在组织损失发生后 3 个月以上才转至血管中心。转诊时间,而不是组织损失缺乏明确的诱发因素,与组织损失的严重程度显著相关。

结论

导致组织损伤的明确诱发因素通常不明显,尤其是在白蛋白水平较低和压力感觉保留的患者中。延迟转至血管中心就诊仍很常见。