Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
University Malaya, University Malaya Dental Education Enhancement and Development Unit (UMDEED), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
J Dent Educ. 2022 Nov;86(11):1477-1487. doi: 10.1002/jdd.12954. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
This study aimed to explore students' perceptions of flipped classroom (FC) compared to live demonstration (LD) in transferring skills of fabricating orthodontic wire components for orthodontic removable appliances.
Forty third-year undergraduate dental students were randomly assigned to two groups: FC (n = 20) and LD (n = 20). Students in group FC attended FC, while students in group LD attended LD. Both groups underwent a series of standardized teaching sessions to acquire skills in fabricating six types of orthodontic wire components. Eight students (four high achievers and four low achievers) from each group were randomly selected to attend separate focus group discussion (FGD) sessions. Students' perceptions on the strengths, weaknesses, and suggestions for improvement on each teaching method were explored. Audio and video recordings of FGD were transcribed and thematically analyzed using NVivo version 12 software.
Promoting personalized learning, improvement in teaching efficacy, inaccuracy of three-dimensional demonstration from online video, and lack of standardization among instructors and video demonstration were among the themes identified. Similarly, lack of standardization among instructors was one of the themes identified for LD, in addition to other themes such as enabling immediate clarification and vantage point affected by seating arrangement and class size.
In conclusion, FC outperformed LD in fostering personalized learning and improving the efficacy of physical class time. LD was more advantageous than FC in allowing immediate question and answer. However, seating arrangement and class size affected LD in contrast to FC.
本研究旨在探讨学生对翻转课堂(FC)与现场演示(LD)在传授正畸可摘矫治器中正畸丝部件制作技能方面的看法。
将 40 名三年级本科牙科学生随机分为两组:FC 组(n=20)和 LD 组(n=20)。FC 组学生参加 FC,LD 组学生参加 LD。两组学生均接受一系列标准化教学,以获得制作六种类型正畸丝部件的技能。每组随机选择 8 名学生(4 名高成就者和 4 名低成就者)参加单独的焦点小组讨论(FGD)。探讨了学生对两种教学方法的优势、劣势以及改进建议的看法。使用 NVivo 版本 12 软件对 FGD 的音频和视频记录进行转录和主题分析。
促进个性化学习、提高教学效果、在线视频三维演示不准确以及教师和视频演示之间缺乏标准化等是确定的主题。同样,LD 也是确定的主题之一,除了其他主题外,还包括允许即时澄清以及座位安排和班级规模对视角的影响。
总之,FC 在促进个性化学习和提高课堂时间教学效果方面优于 LD。LD 比 FC 更有利于即时问答。然而,座位安排和班级规模对 LD 的影响与 FC 不同。