Alsaed Omar, Al Emadi Samar, Satti Eman, Muthanna Bassam, Akkam Veettil Safna Farsana, Ashour Hadeel, Chandra Prem, Alkuwari Einas A, Coyle Peter
Medicine Department, Rheumatology Division, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Medical Research Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Cureus. 2022 Apr 29;14(4):e24585. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24585. eCollection 2022 Apr.
Objective The effectiveness and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) treated with immunomodulators remain uncertain. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate whether the humoral immune response to the BNT162b2 vaccine differs between patients without and with ARDs treated with immunomodulators. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 3208 electronic medical records from the database of the Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC) outpatient rheumatology clinics to capture patients with ARDs and control patients without autoimmune inflammatory diseases. All patients who were SARS-CoV-2 infection-naïve, had received two doses of BNT162b2 vaccination, and had been serologically tested using Elecsys® anti-SARS-CoV-2 S immunoassays (Roche Holdings AG, Basel, Switzerland), were included in the analysis. Patients with ARD were classified into six subgroups according to the received ARD immunomodulators: methotrexate monotherapy (MTXM), a combination of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (Cs-DMARDs), tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNF-i), rituximab, interleukin-6 inhibitor (IL6-i), and Janus kinase inhibitor (JAK-i). Samples with an anti-SARS-CoV-2 S titer of <0.8 and <132 binding antibody unit (BAU)/mL were defined as negative and poor seroconversion, respectively. The overall mean of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S titer and its level at <0.8 and <132 were compared between the six subgroups of patients with ARD and the controls by performing an unpaired -test and Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Results The mean (SD) age of 110 patients with ARDs and 20 controls was 47.1 (12) and 59.3 (8.9) years (P < 0.001), respectively, and women predominated both groups (60% vs 75%, P = 0.20). The most frequently prescribed Cs-DMARDs was methotrexate in 50 (45.5%) patients, followed by TNF-i in 46 (41.8%), rituximab in 20 (18.2%), JAK-i in 12 (10.9%), and IL6-i in 7 (6.4%) patients. The mean (SD) anti-SARS-CoV-2 S antibody titer of only the rituximab subgroup significantly differed from the controls (P = 0.012). Conclusion The most prevalent ARD immunomodulators (Cs-DMARDs, TNF-i, JAK-i, and IL6-i) were associated with comparable seroconversion rates to the BNT162b2 vaccine. In comparison, rituximab was significantly associated with decreased immunogenicity.
目的 对于接受免疫调节剂治疗的自身免疫性风湿性疾病(ARDs)患者,严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)疫苗的有效性和安全性仍不确定。因此,本研究旨在评估接受和未接受免疫调节剂治疗的ARDs患者对BNT162b2疫苗的体液免疫反应是否存在差异。方法 我们回顾性分析了哈马德医疗公司(HMC)门诊风湿病诊所数据库中的3208份电子病历,以纳入ARDs患者和无自身免疫性炎症疾病的对照患者。所有未感染过SARS-CoV-2、接受过两剂BNT162b2疫苗接种且使用Elecsys®抗SARS-CoV-2 S免疫测定法(罗氏控股公司,瑞士巴塞尔)进行血清学检测的患者均纳入分析。根据接受的ARD免疫调节剂,将ARD患者分为六个亚组:甲氨蝶呤单药治疗(MTXM)、传统合成抗风湿药物(Cs-DMARDs)联合治疗、肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNF-i)、利妥昔单抗、白细胞介素-6抑制剂(IL6-i)和 Janus激酶抑制剂(JAK-i)。抗SARS-CoV-2 S滴度<0.8和结合抗体单位(BAU)/mL<132的样本分别定义为阴性和血清转化不良。通过进行不成对t检验以及适当时的卡方检验或Fisher精确检验,比较ARD患者六个亚组与对照组之间抗SARS-CoV-2 S滴度的总体均值及其<0.8和<132时的水平。结果 110例ARD患者和20例对照患者的平均(标准差)年龄分别为47.1(12)岁和59.3(8.9)岁(P<0.001),两组均以女性为主(60%对75%,P = 0.20)。最常处方的Cs-DMARDs是甲氨蝶呤,共50例(45.5%)患者,其次是TNF-i,共46例(41.8%),利妥昔单抗20例(18.2%),JAK-i 12例(10.9%),IL6-i 7例(6.4%)。仅利妥昔单抗亚组的抗SARS-CoV-2 S抗体平均滴度与对照组有显著差异(P = 0.012)。结论 最常用的ARD免疫调节剂(Cs-DMARDs、TNF-i、JAK-i和IL6-i)与BNT162b2疫苗的血清转化率相当。相比之下,利妥昔单抗与免疫原性降低显著相关。