School of Nursing and Health Professions, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, US.
WHO Collaborating Centre for Governance, Accountability, and Transparency in the Pharmaceutical Sector, University of Toronto, US.
Ann Glob Health. 2022 May 24;88(1):37. doi: 10.5334/aogh.3691. eCollection 2022.
Maternity waiting homes (MWH) allow pregnant women to stay in a residential facility close to a health center while awaiting delivery. This approach can improve health outcomes for women and children. Health planners need to consider many factors in deciding the number of beds needed for an MWH.
The objective of the study is to review experience in Zambia in planning and implementing MWHs, and consider lessons learned in determining optimal capacity.
We conducted a study of 10 newly built MWH in Zambia over 12 months. For this case study analysis, data on beds, service volume, and catchment area population were examined, including women staying at the homes, bed occupancy, and average length of stay. We analyzed bed occupancy by location and health facility catchment area size, and categorized occupancy by month from very low to very high.
Most study sites were rural, with 3 of the 10 study sites rural-remote. Four sites served small catchment areas (<9 000), 3 had medium (9 000-11 000), and 3 had large (>11 000) size populations. Annual occupancy was variable among the sites, ranging from 13% (a medium rural site) to 151% (a large rural-remote site). Occupancy higher than 100% was accommodated by repurposing the MWH postnatal beds and using extra mattresses. Most sites had between 26-69% annual occupancy, but monthly occupancy was highly variable for reasons that seem unrelated to catchment area size, rural or rural-remote location.
Planning for MWH capacity is difficult due to high variability. Our analysis suggests planners should try to gather actual recent monthly birth data and estimate capacity using the highest expected utilization months, anticipating that facility-based deliveries may increase with introduction of a MWH. Further research is needed to document and share data on MWH operations, including utilization statistics like number of beds, mattresses, occupancy rates and average length of stay.
孕妇等候家园(MWH)允许孕妇在靠近卫生中心的住所居住,等待分娩。这种方法可以改善妇女和儿童的健康结果。卫生规划者在决定 MWH 需要的床位数量时需要考虑许多因素。
本研究旨在回顾赞比亚在规划和实施 MWH 方面的经验,并考虑确定最佳容量的经验教训。
我们对赞比亚的 10 个新建成的 MWH 进行了为期 12 个月的研究。在这项案例研究分析中,我们检查了床位、服务量和服务覆盖人群的数据,包括住在这些家园的妇女、床位入住率和平均停留时间。我们按地理位置和卫生设施服务覆盖人群大小分析了床位入住率,并按床位入住率的高低将入住率分为极低、低、中、高和极高。
大多数研究地点位于农村,其中 10 个研究地点中的 3 个位于偏远农村地区。4 个研究地点的服务覆盖人群较少(<9000 人),3 个研究地点的服务覆盖人群中等(9000-11000 人),3 个研究地点的服务覆盖人群较大(>11000 人)。各研究地点的年入住率不同,从 13%(一个中等农村地区的研究地点)到 151%(一个偏远农村地区的研究地点)。入住率高于 100%的情况通过重新利用 MWH 的产后床位和使用额外的床垫来解决。大多数研究地点的年入住率在 26%-69%之间,但由于与服务覆盖人群大小、农村或偏远农村地区的位置无关的原因,月入住率存在高度差异。
由于高度的可变性,MWH 容量规划具有挑战性。我们的分析表明,规划者应尝试收集最近的实际每月分娩数据,并使用预期最高的使用月份来估计容量,预计随着 MWH 的引入,设施内分娩可能会增加。需要进一步研究以记录和共享 MWH 运营数据,包括床位、床垫、入住率和平均停留时间等利用统计数据。