Chenghua Yuan, Min Wei, Wei Li, Xinyu Wang, Fengzeng Jian
xuanwu hospital.
Turk Neurosurg. 2022 Jan 10. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.35727-21.5.
Some meta-analyses have focused on foramen magnum decompression with duraplasty (PFDD) and without duraplasty (PFD) in paediatric or mixed populations. Nevertheless, no meta-analysis has evaluated adults only. This study aimed to include new relevant findings in a systematic review to provide the first comparison of PFDD and PFD in adult CM-I.
We retrospectively searched Web of Science, PubMed, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov to summarize all relevant published papers on adults. A systemic review was adopted to evaluate clinical or radiological improvement, surgical complications, and reoperation rates between the PFD and PFDD groups.
Nine papers containing information on 497 adult participants met the criteria. PFDD was related to a lower revision rate (RR=2.96, 95% CI: 1.34-6.51, P=0.007) but a higher complication rate (RR=0.35, 95% CI: 0.22-0.55, P 0.00001). No significant difference was noted between PFD and PFDD in terms of overall symptom improvement (RR=0.93, 95% CI: 0.84-1.03, P = 0.17) or syringomyelia reduction (RR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.63-1.12, P = 0.24). No significant difference in symptom improvement was observed between patients with syringomyelia (RR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.69-1.08, P = 0.20) and patients without syringomyelia (RR=0.94, 95% CI: 0.68-1.30, P = 0.73).
This systematic review of observational studies reveals that PFDD may provide lower revision rates but pose a higher risk than PFD in the management of CM-I in adults. However, PFD is similar to PFDD in clinical and radiological improvements.
一些荟萃分析聚焦于小儿或混合人群中伴有硬脑膜成形术的枕骨大孔减压术(PFDD)和不伴有硬脑膜成形术的枕骨大孔减压术(PFD)。然而,尚无荟萃分析仅评估成人患者。本研究旨在将新的相关发现纳入一项系统评价,以首次比较成人 Chiari I 型畸形(CM-I)中 PFDD 和 PFD 的疗效。
我们对 Web of Science、PubMed、Embase 和 ClinicalTrials.gov 进行回顾性检索,以汇总所有关于成人的相关已发表论文。采用系统评价来评估 PFD 组和 PFDD 组之间的临床或影像学改善情况、手术并发症及再次手术率。
9 篇包含 497 名成年参与者信息的论文符合标准。PFDD 与较低的翻修率相关(RR = 2.96,95%CI:1.34 - 6.51,P = 0.007),但并发症发生率较高(RR = 0.35,95%CI:0.22 - 0.55,P < 0.00001)。在总体症状改善方面(RR = 0.93,95%CI:0.84 - 1.03,P = 0.17)或脊髓空洞症减轻方面(RR = 0.84,95%CI:0.63 - 1.12,P = 0.24),PFD 和 PFDD 之间未观察到显著差异。伴有脊髓空洞症的患者(RR = 0.86,95%CI:0.69 - 1.08,P = 0.20)和不伴有脊髓空洞症的患者(RR = 0.94,95%CI:0.68 - 1.30,P = 0.73)在症状改善方面未观察到显著差异。
这项对观察性研究的系统评价表明,在成人 CM-I 的治疗中,PFDD 可能提供较低的翻修率,但比 PFD 具有更高的风险。然而,PFD 在临床和影像学改善方面与 PFDD 相似。