University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.
Hitotsubashi University, Japan.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Aug;49(8):1213-1230. doi: 10.1177/01461672221089061. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
Cross-cultural research suggests that rumination may have weaker maladaptive effects in Eastern than in Western cultural contexts. This study examines a mechanism underlying cultural differences in mental health correlates of rumination from sociocultural cognitive perspective. We propose that cultures differ in how people attribute rumination, which can lead to cultural differences in the link between rumination and mental health correlates. We developed the Attribution of Rumination scale, tested cultural differences (Study 1), and examined its relationship with theoretically related constructs (Study 2). In Study 3, self-doubt attribution moderated the association between rumination and mental health, partly explaining cultural differences in the rumination-mental health link. Study 4 replicated self-doubt attribution moderating the link between rumination and mental health among Asians. Furthermore, greater exposure to American culture was associated with self-doubt attribution. This work provides a novel approach to understanding cultural differences in the association between rumination and negative psychological correlates.
跨文化研究表明,在东方文化背景下,反刍思维的适应不良影响可能比在西方文化背景下弱。本研究从社会认知文化的角度探讨了反刍思维与心理健康相关因素的文化差异的内在机制。我们提出,不同文化对反刍思维的归因方式不同,这可能导致反刍思维与心理健康相关因素之间的联系存在文化差异。我们开发了反刍思维归因量表,检验了文化差异(研究 1),并考察了它与理论相关构念的关系(研究 2)。在研究 3 中,自我怀疑归因调节了反刍思维与心理健康之间的关系,部分解释了反刍思维与心理健康关系中的文化差异。研究 4 在亚洲人群中复制了反刍思维与心理健康之间的自我怀疑归因的中介作用。此外,更多地接触美国文化与自我怀疑归因有关。这项工作为理解反刍思维与消极心理相关因素之间的关联的文化差异提供了一种新方法。