Suppr超能文献

严重烧伤患者的死亡率预测模型:哪一个是最好的?

Mortality prediction models for severe burn patients: Which one is the best?

机构信息

Department of Burn Treatment Center, University of Health Sciences İzmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, İzmir-Turkey.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Jun;28(6):790-795. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.29540.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

For prediction of mortality and clinical course, various scoring systems had been developed. We choose four well known burn specific scoring systems and a general scoring system that using in Intensive Care Units. The primary outcome of this study was evaluate the predictive performances of this models and define the optimal one for our patient population.

METHODS

Variables analyzed were age, gender, burn type, total burned surface area (TBSA), total partial thickness burn area, total full thickness burn area, inhalation injuries, mechanical ventilation supports, blood products usage, total scores of Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI), revised Baux, Belgian Outcome in Burn Injury, Fatality by Longevity, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Eval-uation II (APACHE II) score, Measured Extent of burn and Sex (FLAMES) and APACHE II, and their relations with mortality.

RESULTS

In our study, a statistically significant relationship was found with mortality between age, TBSA, full thickness burn percent-age, inhalation injury, burn type, and it was similar to literature. Female gender was found to be a significant risk factor for mortality.

CONCLUSION

We compared several burn mortality scoring systems and their predictional mortality rates. ABSI scores of patients for estimated mortality rates were similar to our mortality rate. Consequently, it was thought that ABSI was included all mortality-re-lated parameters.

摘要

背景

为了预测死亡率和临床病程,已经开发了各种评分系统。我们选择了四个著名的烧伤特异性评分系统和一个在重症监护病房中使用的一般评分系统。本研究的主要结局是评估这些模型的预测性能,并为我们的患者群体定义最佳模型。

方法

分析的变量包括年龄、性别、烧伤类型、总烧伤表面积(TBSA)、全层烧伤面积、全层烧伤面积、吸入性损伤、机械通气支持、血液制品使用、简化烧伤严重程度指数(ABSI)的总评分、修订的 Baux、比利时烧伤结局、长寿死亡率、急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II(APACHE II)评分、测量的烧伤范围和性别(FLAMES)和 APACHE II,以及它们与死亡率的关系。

结果

在我们的研究中,年龄、TBSA、全层烧伤百分比、吸入性损伤、烧伤类型与死亡率之间存在统计学显著关系,这与文献报道相似。女性被发现是死亡率的一个显著危险因素。

结论

我们比较了几种烧伤死亡率评分系统及其预测死亡率。患者的 ABSI 评分与我们的死亡率相似,用于估计死亡率。因此,认为 ABSI 包含了所有与死亡率相关的参数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2417/10443002/f49ae8987e70/TJTES-28-790-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验