• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测严重烧伤患者的死亡率:四种死亡率预测评分的比较及克罗地亚烧伤中心组织变革的作用

Predicting Mortality in Severe Burns: A Comparison of Four Mortality Prediction Scores and the Role of Organizational Changes in the Croatian Burn Center.

作者信息

Skunca Agata, Mesic Ana, Zagorac Dorotea, Dobric Mirela, Lokosek Vedran, Banic Morana, Munjiza Aleksandra, Muratovic Aisa

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Center, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.

Department of Traumatology, Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Center, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Eur Burn J. 2024 Nov 15;5(4):410-417. doi: 10.3390/ebj5040036.

DOI:10.3390/ebj5040036
PMID:39727912
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11587143/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of four burn prognostic scores-Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI), Ryan, Belgium Outcome Burn Injury (BOBI), and revised Baux score (rBaux) in a Croatian burn center. A secondary aim was to compare patient outcomes before and after the organizational and protocol changes.

METHODS

A retrospective study and comparison of four prediction scores was conducted over a nine-year period in burn patients with ≥20% total body surface area (TBSA) burned. Additionally, outcomes before and after organizational changes were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 149 patients were included, with the mean patient age of 54.62 ± 19.38 years, the mean of TBSA of 42.98 ± 19.90, and an overall mortality rate of 48.99%. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was 0.79 for the rBaux and ABSI score, 0.77 for the BOBI score, and 0.76 for the Ryan score. The duration of mechanical ventilation and length of stay (LOS) in burn intensive care units (BICU) decreased after the organizational changes, though survival rates remained similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Prognostic scores are good predictors of mortality but with moderate predictive accuracy. Continuity of care in intensive care could be important for better outcomes.

摘要

背景

本研究的主要目的是评估四种烧伤预后评分——简化烧伤严重程度指数(ABSI)、瑞安评分、比利时烧伤结局评分(BOBI)和修订版博克斯评分(rBaux)在克罗地亚一家烧伤中心的表现。次要目的是比较组织和方案变更前后的患者结局。

方法

对九年期间烧伤总面积(TBSA)≥20%的烧伤患者进行了一项回顾性研究,并对四种预测评分进行了比较。此外,还比较了组织变更前后的结局。

结果

共纳入149例患者,患者平均年龄为54.62±19.38岁,TBSA平均为42.98±19.90,总死亡率为48.99%。rBaux和ABSI评分的ROC曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.79,BOBI评分为0.77,瑞安评分为0.76。组织变更后,机械通气时间和烧伤重症监护病房(BICU)的住院时间缩短,尽管生存率保持相似。

结论

预后评分是死亡率的良好预测指标,但预测准确性中等。重症监护中的连续性护理对于改善结局可能很重要。

相似文献

1
Predicting Mortality in Severe Burns: A Comparison of Four Mortality Prediction Scores and the Role of Organizational Changes in the Croatian Burn Center.预测严重烧伤患者的死亡率:四种死亡率预测评分的比较及克罗地亚烧伤中心组织变革的作用
Eur Burn J. 2024 Nov 15;5(4):410-417. doi: 10.3390/ebj5040036.
2
Predictors of mortality and validation of burn mortality prognostic scores in a Malaysian burns intensive care unit.马来西亚烧伤重症监护病房死亡率的预测因素及烧伤死亡率预后评分的验证
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Nov 7;19(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0284-8.
3
Comparative Analysis of Composite Mortality Prediction Scores in Intensive Care Burn Patients.重症烧伤患者复合死亡率预测评分的比较分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 28;19(19):12321. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912321.
4
Revised Baux Score and updated Charlson comorbidity index are independently associated with mortality in burns intensive care patients.修订后的 Baux 评分和更新后的 Charlson 合并症指数与烧伤重症监护患者的死亡率独立相关。
Burns. 2015 Nov;41(7):1420-7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
5
Comparison of mortality prediction models and validation of SAPS II in critically ill burns patients.危重症烧伤患者死亡率预测模型的比较及序贯器官衰竭评估Ⅱ(SAPS II)的验证
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2016 Jun 30;29(2):123-129.
6
Burn Mortality in an Appalachian Referral Center: An Examination of Mortality Prediction Scores in a 13-Year Retrospective Study.阿巴拉契亚转诊中心的烧伤死亡率:一项为期13年的回顾性研究中的死亡率预测评分分析
Cureus. 2024 Jun 22;16(6):e62912. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62912. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Predictive value of quick SOFA and revised Baux scores in burn patients.快速序贯器官衰竭评估和改良 Baux 评分对烧伤患者的预测价值。
Burns. 2020 Mar;46(2):347-351. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
8
Prognostic Scores for Mortality in Invasive Mechanically Ventilated Burn Patients.有创机械通气烧伤患者死亡率的预后评分
Cureus. 2024 Jun 30;16(6):e63502. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63502. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Comparison of prognostic models for burn patients: A retrospective nationwide registry study.烧伤患者预后模型的比较:一项回顾性全国登记研究。
Burns. 2020 Dec;46(8):1746-1755. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.10.008. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
10
Epidemiology and risk prediction of patients with severe burns admitted to a burn intensive care unit in a burn center in beijing: A 5-year retrospective study.北京某烧伤中心烧伤重症监护病房收治的严重烧伤患者的流行病学及风险预测:一项5年回顾性研究
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 24;8(12):e12572. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12572. eCollection 2022 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
EPIDEMIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH MORTALITY IN SEVERELY BURNED PATIENTS - CROATIAN NATIONAL BURN CENTER REPORT.严重烧伤患者的流行病学特征和死亡相关因素-克罗地亚国家烧伤中心报告。
Acta Clin Croat. 2023 Apr;62(1):115-122. doi: 10.20471/acc.2023.62.01.14.
2
Mortality prediction models for severe burn patients: Which one is the best?严重烧伤患者的死亡率预测模型:哪一个是最好的?
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Jun;28(6):790-795. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.29540.
3
The Role Of Comorbidities On Outcome Prediction In Acute Burn Patients.
合并症在急性烧伤患者预后预测中的作用
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2021 Dec 31;34(4):323-333.
4
Clinical outcome and comparison of burn injury scoring systems in burn patient in Indonesia.印度尼西亚烧伤患者的临床结局及烧伤损伤评分系统比较
Afr J Emerg Med. 2021 Sep;11(3):331-334. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2021.04.005. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
5
Effect of comorbidities on clinical outcome of patients with burn injury - An analysis of the German Burn Registry.合并症对烧伤患者临床结局的影响——德国烧伤登记处的分析
Burns. 2021 Aug;47(5):1053-1058. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.04.040. Epub 2020 May 13.
6
The analysis and accuracy of mortality prediction scores in burn patients admitted to the intensive care burn unit (ICBU).入住重症烧伤监护病房(ICBU)的烧伤患者死亡率预测评分的分析与准确性。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Apr 2;65:102249. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102249. eCollection 2021 May.
7
Predictors of mortality and validation of burn mortality prognostic scores in a Malaysian burns intensive care unit.马来西亚烧伤重症监护病房死亡率的预测因素及烧伤死亡率预后评分的验证
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Nov 7;19(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0284-8.
8
A comparison of injury scoring systems in predicting burn mortality.损伤评分系统在预测烧伤死亡率方面的比较。
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2018 Jun 30;31(2):89-93.
9
Predicting Mortality in Severe Burns-What Is the Score?: Evaluation and Comparison of 4 Mortality Prediction Scores in an Irish Population.预测严重烧伤患者的死亡率——分数是多少?:爱尔兰人群中4种死亡率预测分数的评估与比较
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Feb 5;4(1):e606. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000584. eCollection 2016 Jan.
10
The Baux score is dead. Long live the Baux score: a 27-year retrospective cohort study of mortality at a regional burns service.鲍克斯评分已死:一项区域性烧伤中心 27 年死亡率回顾性队列研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Jan;72(1):251-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31824052bb.