• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标准微型钢板与锁定微型钢板治疗创伤后骨折的比较。

Comparison of standard miniplates and locked miniplates in post-traumatic fracture stabilization.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillfacial Surgery, Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry, İstanbul-Turkey.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Jun;28(6):715-722. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.59447.

DOI:10.14744/tjtes.2022.59447
PMID:35652876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10443005/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bicortical screws (lag and positional) or miniplates with monocortical screws are generally used for the rigid fixa-tion of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) in maxillofacial surgery. However, in this osteosynthesis method, the plate must be perfectly adapted to the bone to prevent misalignment of the bone segment and occlusal changes. In addition, it is necessary to prevent the position of the condyle in the mandibular fossa from changing after fixation. In recent years, locked miniplate systems have been used to overcome these complications.

METHODS

The aim of this study is to compare the commonly used 2.0 mm standard miniplate/screw systems and 2.0 mm locking miniplate/screw systems in fresh sheep jaws with Obwegeser-Dal Pont (OD) and Hunsuck-Epker (HE) modifications, by evaluating standard parameters.

RESULTS

Our study consists of two main groups and two subgroups. 40 sheep hemimandibulae were randomly divided into two main groups. Each group was randomly divided into two subgroups. There are ten hemimandibulae (n=10) in each subgroup. Linear force test was applied using 4-hole standard miniplate and 4-hole locking miniplate systems on sheep jaws with 5 mm advancement by applying OD and HE techniques, which are two frequently preferred modifications in SSRO. For statistical analysis SPSS® 16.0 (Sta-tistical Package for the Social Sciences, SPSS Inc. Chicago, Illinois, USA) package program was used. It was statistically compared with the 95% confidence interval using the Pearson coefficient, and p<0.05 was interpreted as significant. The values of the loading forces applied to the samples in the groups were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) to confirm the normality of the sample. Multiple comparisons were made between groups using the Tukey test. The mean loadings in the groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA.

CONCLUSION

In general, as the strength of the force increases, the displacement values increase in all groups, but although it was observed that the locked miniplate/screw system was more stable than the standard miniplate/screw system, no statistically significant difference was found.

摘要

背景

在颌面外科中,通常使用双皮质螺钉(拉力和位置)或单皮质螺钉的微型板来固定矢状劈开下颌支截骨术(SSRO)。然而,在这种骨合成方法中,钢板必须与骨骼完美适配,以防止骨段错位和咬合变化。此外,有必要防止固定后下颌窝中髁突的位置发生变化。近年来,已使用锁定微型板系统来克服这些并发症。

方法

本研究旨在通过评估标准参数,比较常用的 2.0mm 标准微型板/螺钉系统和 2.0mm 锁定微型板/螺钉系统在 Obwegeser-Dal Pont(OD)和 Hunsuck-Epker(HE)改良的新鲜羊颌骨中的性能。

结果

我们的研究包括两个主要组和两个亚组。40 只羊下颌骨随机分为两组。每组再随机分为两个亚组。每个亚组有 10 个下颌骨(n=10)。通过 OD 和 HE 技术,在下颌骨上施加 5mm 的前进,用 4 孔标准微型板和 4 孔锁定微型板系统对羊下颌骨进行线性力测试,这是 SSRO 中两种常用的改良方法。为了进行统计分析,使用了 SPSS®16.0(社会科学统计软件包,SPSS Inc.,美国伊利诺伊州芝加哥)软件包程序。使用 Pearson 系数在 95%置信区间内进行了统计学比较,p<0.05 被解释为有统计学意义。对组内样本施加的加载力值进行方差分析(ANOVA),以确认样本的正态性。使用 Tukey 检验进行组间的多重比较。对各组的平均载荷进行单因素方差分析。

结论

总的来说,随着力的强度增加,所有组的位移值都增加,但尽管观察到锁定微型板/螺钉系统比标准微型板/螺钉系统更稳定,但没有发现统计学上的显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b795/10443005/023043dcf3c7/TJTES-28-715-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b795/10443005/c5cb420ece1a/TJTES-28-715-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b795/10443005/023043dcf3c7/TJTES-28-715-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b795/10443005/c5cb420ece1a/TJTES-28-715-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b795/10443005/023043dcf3c7/TJTES-28-715-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of standard miniplates and locked miniplates in post-traumatic fracture stabilization.标准微型钢板与锁定微型钢板治疗创伤后骨折的比较。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Jun;28(6):715-722. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.59447.
2
In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.传统与锁定微型钢板/螺钉系统用于下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术的体外生物力学评估
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Apr;68(4):724-30. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.018. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
3
Comperative evaluation of the current and new design miniplate fixation techniques of the advanced sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite element analysis.采用三维有限元分析法对当前和新型设计的下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术微型接骨板固定技术的比较评估。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2023 Nov 1;28(6):e553-e561. doi: 10.4317/medoral.25964.
4
Does fixation method affects temporomandibular joints after mandibular advancement?固定方式是否会影响下颌前伸术后的颞下颌关节?
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Jun;46(6):923-931. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.03.024. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
5
An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术的坚固内固定技术的体外评估:前徙手术
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Apr;67(4):809-17. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.11.009.
6
An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: setback surgery.矢状劈开下颌支截骨术的坚固内固定技术的体外评估:后退手术
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Apr;70(4):941-51. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.106. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
7
Experimental analysis of functional stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomies secured by miniplates and position screws.微型钢板和定位螺钉固定下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术功能稳定性的实验分析
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996 Nov;54(11):1317-24; discussion 1324-6. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(96)90490-5.
8
Biomechanical evaluation of hybrid fixation method of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement.下颌骨前徙矢状劈开截骨术混合固定方法的生物力学评价
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Dec;46(12):2063-2068. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 May 9.
9
Mechanical evaluation of six techniques for stable fixation of the sagittal split osteotomy after counterclockwise mandibular advancement.逆时针下颌前徙后矢状劈开截骨术六种稳定固定技术的力学评估
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jun;54(5):573-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
10
In vitro biomechanical comparison of six different fixation methods following 5-mm sagittal split advancement osteotomies.5毫米矢状劈开前徙截骨术后六种不同固定方法的体外生物力学比较
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Aug;44(8):984-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.11.019. Epub 2015 Apr 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Locking versus non-locking plating system in the treatment of mandibular fractures: A randomized comparative study.锁定与非锁定接骨板系统治疗下颌骨骨折:一项随机对照研究。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2021 Mar;49(3):184-190. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.01.006. Epub 2021 Jan 17.
2
Locking Plate System Versus Standard Plate Fixation in the Management of Mandibular Fractures: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.锁定钢板系统与标准钢板固定在下颌骨骨折治疗中的比较:随机对照试验的Meta分析
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Sep;28(6):1456-1461. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003857.
3
Biomechanical evaluation of different osteosynthesis methods after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy in major advancements.
下颌矢状劈开截骨术在大幅前移后不同接骨方法的生物力学评估
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Nov;46(11):1387-1393. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.05.016. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
4
Mechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems used in sagittal split ramus osteotomy.矢状劈开下颌支截骨术中使用传统及锁定微型钢板/螺钉系统的力学评估
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Apr;43(2):77-82. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.2.77. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
5
In vitro biomechanical comparison of six different fixation methods following 5-mm sagittal split advancement osteotomies.5毫米矢状劈开前徙截骨术后六种不同固定方法的体外生物力学比较
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Aug;44(8):984-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.11.019. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
6
The modifications of the sagittal ramus split osteotomy: a literature review.矢状支劈开截骨术的改良:文献综述
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Jan 8;2(12):e271. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000127. eCollection 2014 Dec.
7
Influence of the design in sagittal split ramus osteotomy on the mechanical behavior.矢状劈开下颌支截骨术中设计对力学行为的影响。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014 May 15;7(5):1284-8. eCollection 2014.
8
A comparative evaluation of the hybrid technique for fixation of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement by mechanical, photoelastic, and finite element analysis.对下颌前突矢状劈开截骨术的机械、光弹和有限元分析的混合固定技术的比较评价。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012 Nov;114(5 Suppl):S60-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.08.027. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
9
In vitro biomechanical evaluation of sagittal split osteotomy fixation with a specifically designed miniplate.一种特制微型接骨板固定下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术的体外生物力学评价
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Mar;42(3):316-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.07.008. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
10
Analysis and comparison of clinical results of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy performed with the use of monocortical locking plate fixation or bicortical screw fixation.分析比较使用单皮质锁定板固定或双皮质螺钉固定行双侧矢状劈开截骨术的临床结果。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Nov;116(5):e333-41. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.02.025. Epub 2012 Jul 24.