Bahcesehir University, Faculty of Dentistry Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Gayrettepe, Cam Han Binası Barbaros Blv. No: 153, 34357, Beşiktaş, İstanbul
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2023 Nov 1;28(6):e553-e561. doi: 10.4317/medoral.25964.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the stress occurring in the fixation systems both developed in various geometric designs for this study and currently used in sagittal split ramus advancement osteotomy using finite element analysis.
The finite element model that imitates three-dimensional sagittal split advancement osteotomy was fixed in 10 different miniplate fixation methods: one miniplate fixed with four monocortical screws in a horizontal and oblique pattern; four-hole two miniplates with eight monocortical screws; five-hole miniplate fixed with four monocortical and one bicortical screws; six-hole straight and curved miniplates fixed with six monocortical screws in different geometric designs. Unilateral masticatory muscle loads that have previously determined in the literature were applied to the model at the anatomical muscle attachment regions and the data obtained from finite element analysis and static linear analysis methods were recorded as Von mises, maximum principle and minimum principle stress values.
It was observed from the results that maximum stress occurred in Group 1, which consisted of double backward T-shaped miniplate with 6-holes and, minimum stress occured in group 10, which mimiced hybrid system with one miniplate and four monocortical and one bicortical screws.
Based on our results, the stress on the miniplates changes according to the geometric designs and the stress on the miniplate decreases as the numbers of miniplates and bars increase. The hybrid miniplate may be preferred by the surgeon as it will be exposed to less stress in excessive mandibular advancements by using the advantages of both the miniplate and the bicortical screw.
本研究旨在通过有限元分析评估为这项研究设计的不同几何形状的固定系统和目前用于矢状劈开下颌升支骨切开术的固定系统所产生的应力。
模仿三维矢状劈开前徙骨切开术的有限元模型,采用 10 种不同的小钢板固定方法进行固定:一种用 4 个皮质骨螺钉按水平和斜向模式固定的小钢板;用 8 个皮质骨螺钉固定的 4 孔 2 块小钢板;用 4 个皮质骨螺钉和 1 个松质骨螺钉固定的 5 孔小钢板;用不同几何设计的 6 个皮质骨螺钉固定的直型和弯型 6 孔小钢板。将文献中先前确定的单侧咀嚼肌负荷施加到模型的解剖肌肉附着区,记录从有限元分析和静态线性分析方法获得的数据,作为 Von mises、最大主应力和最小主应力值。
结果表明,最大应力出现在由 6 孔双反向 T 形小钢板组成的第 1 组中,最小应力出现在模仿用 1 块小钢板和 4 个皮质骨螺钉及 1 个松质骨螺钉的混合系统的第 10 组中。
根据我们的结果,小钢板的应力随几何设计的变化而变化,随着小钢板和杆的数量的增加,小钢板的应力减小。混合小钢板可能更受外科医生的青睐,因为它将利用小钢板和皮质骨螺钉的优势,在过度的下颌前徙中承受较小的应力。