• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教师发展如何才能最好地支持临床环境中的教师?

How best can faculty development support teachers in clinical settings?

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.

Centre de Pédagogie des Sciences de la Santé, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2022 May 2;83(5):1-8. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2021.0671. Epub 2022 May 6.

DOI:10.12968/hmed.2021.0671
PMID:35653319
Abstract

Faculty development is key to ensuring quality clinical teaching, but standardising teaching practices in multiple settings is a challenge. This article presents an example of a 3-year faculty development programme for teaching clinical reasoning skills, implemented by the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada for its faculty members at multiple teaching sites. A follow-up study 1-5 months after the final workshop, using a self-assessment questionnaire, indicates that almost half of the participants transferred some of their newly acquired knowledge into their teaching practices. This article discusses factors to consider when developing a faculty development culture, at both a programme and faculty level, to support quality teaching and learning.

摘要

教师发展是确保临床教学质量的关键,但在多个环境中规范教学实践是一项挑战。本文介绍了加拿大魁北克省舍布鲁克大学医学与健康科学学院为其多个教学点的教师实施的为期 3 年的临床推理技能教学教师发展计划的一个例子。在最后一次研讨会结束后 1-5 个月进行的后续研究采用了自我评估问卷,结果表明,近一半的参与者将他们新获得的一些知识应用到了教学实践中。本文讨论了在计划和教师层面上发展教师发展文化时需要考虑的因素,以支持高质量的教学和学习。

相似文献

1
How best can faculty development support teachers in clinical settings?教师发展如何才能最好地支持临床环境中的教师?
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2022 May 2;83(5):1-8. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2021.0671. Epub 2022 May 6.
2
Teaching and learning clinical reasoning: a teacher's toolbox to meet different learning needs.临床推理的教学与学习:满足不同学习需求的教师工具箱。
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2020 Mar 2;81(3):1-8. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2019.0406. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
3
What do faculty feel about teaching in this school? assessment of medical education environment by teachers.教师对在这所学校教学有何看法?教师对医学教育环境的评估。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2017 Jan-Apr;30(1):68-74. doi: 10.4103/1357-6283.210500.
4
Adherence to Trained Standards After a Faculty Development Workshop on "Teaching With Simulated Patients".在关于“使用模拟患者进行教学”的教师发展研讨会后对训练标准的遵守情况
GMS J Med Educ. 2017 Oct 16;34(4):Doc45. doi: 10.3205/zma001122. eCollection 2017.
5
Impact of a faculty development programme for teaching communication skills on participants' practice.教学沟通技巧的师资发展计划对参与者实践的影响。
Postgrad Med J. 2014 May;90(1063):245-50. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-131700. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
6
An evaluation of training of teachers in medical education in four medical schools of Nepal.尼泊尔四所医学院校医学教育教师培训情况评估。
Nepal Med Coll J. 2007 Sep;9(3):157-61.
7
Spaced education faculty development may not improve faculty teaching performance ratings in a surgery department.间隔式教育师资发展可能无法提高外科部门教师教学绩效评级。
J Surg Educ. 2012 Jan-Feb;69(1):52-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.06.013. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
8
Faculty Development for Small-Group-Teaching with Simulated Patients (SP) - Design and Evaluation of a Competency-based Workshop.基于模拟患者(SP)的小组教学教师发展——基于能力的工作坊的设计与评估
GMS J Med Educ. 2017 Oct 16;34(4):Doc42. doi: 10.3205/zma001119. eCollection 2017.
9
Humanising medical education through faculty development: linking self-awareness and teaching skills.通过教师发展实现医学教育人性化:将自我认知与教学技能相联系。
Med Educ. 2005 Feb;39(2):154-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02065.x.
10
Teaching behaviors in the cardiac surgery simulation environment.心脏外科模拟环境中的教学行为。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Jan;145(1):45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.111. Epub 2012 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Constructing an evaluation index system for clinical nursing practice teaching quality using a Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process-based approach.采用德尔菲法和层次分析法构建临床护理实践教学质量评价指标体系。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 19;24(1):772. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05770-y.
2
Minding the gap: towards a shared clinical reasoning lexicon across the pre-clerkship/clerkship transition.弥合差距:在预科/临床实习过渡阶段建立共同的临床推理词汇
Med Educ Online. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):2307715. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2307715. Epub 2024 Feb 6.