• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于模拟患者(SP)的小组教学教师发展——基于能力的工作坊的设计与评估

Faculty Development for Small-Group-Teaching with Simulated Patients (SP) - Design and Evaluation of a Competency-based Workshop.

作者信息

Hölzer Henrike, Freytag Julia, Sonntag Ulrike

机构信息

Medizinischen Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany.

Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Abteilung für Curriculumsorganisation, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

GMS J Med Educ. 2017 Oct 16;34(4):Doc42. doi: 10.3205/zma001119. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3205/zma001119
PMID:29085886
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5654117/
Abstract

The introduction of innovative teaching formats and methods in medical education requires a specific didactic training for teachers to use complicated formats effectively. This paper describes preliminary considerations, design, implementation and evaluation of a skills-based workshop (7,5 hours long) for teaching with simulated patients. The aim is to describe the essential components for a lasting effect of the workshop so that the concept can be adapted to other contexts. We present the theoretical framework, the objectives, the didactic methodology and the implementation of the workshop. The evaluation of the workshop was carried out using questionnaires. First the participants (teachers of the faculty of medicine, clinical and science subjects) were asked to estimate how well they felt prepared for small group teaching immediately after workshop. Later, after some teaching experience of their own, they gave feedback again as a part of the general evaluation of the semester. In the course of three years 27 trainings were conducted and evaluated with a total of 275 participants. In the context of semester evaluation 452 questionnaires were evaluated on the quality of training. The evaluation shows that participants appreciate the concept of the workshop and also feel sufficiently well prepared. As a limitation it must be said that this is so far only the lecturers' self-assessment. Nevertheless, it can be stated that even a one-day workshop with a stringent teaching concept shows long term results regarding innovative teaching methods.

摘要

在医学教育中引入创新的教学形式和方法,要求教师接受特定的教学培训,以便有效地运用复杂的教学形式。本文描述了一个为期7.5小时的基于技能的模拟患者教学工作坊的初步考量、设计、实施及评估。目的是阐述使该工作坊产生持久效果的关键要素,以便该理念能适用于其他情境。我们介绍了该工作坊的理论框架、目标、教学方法及实施情况。工作坊的评估通过问卷调查进行。首先,要求参与者(医学院各系、临床及理科科目的教师)在工作坊结束后立即评估他们对小组教学的准备程度。之后,在他们积累了一些自身教学经验后,作为学期总体评估的一部分再次给出反馈。在三年时间里,共开展了27次培训并进行了评估,共有275名参与者。在学期评估中,对452份关于培训质量的问卷进行了评估。评估表明,参与者认可工作坊的理念,并且感觉准备充分。需要指出的一个局限性是,到目前为止这只是讲师的自我评估。尽管如此,可以说,即使是一个教学理念严格的为期一天的工作坊,在创新教学方法方面也显示出了长期效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5cc/5654117/5062d29dffbe/JME-34-42-t-003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5cc/5654117/d0336e8e1d8f/JME-34-42-t-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5cc/5654117/3f707c2e1ccb/JME-34-42-t-002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5cc/5654117/5062d29dffbe/JME-34-42-t-003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5cc/5654117/d0336e8e1d8f/JME-34-42-t-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5cc/5654117/3f707c2e1ccb/JME-34-42-t-002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5cc/5654117/5062d29dffbe/JME-34-42-t-003.jpg

相似文献

1
Faculty Development for Small-Group-Teaching with Simulated Patients (SP) - Design and Evaluation of a Competency-based Workshop.基于模拟患者(SP)的小组教学教师发展——基于能力的工作坊的设计与评估
GMS J Med Educ. 2017 Oct 16;34(4):Doc42. doi: 10.3205/zma001119. eCollection 2017.
2
An evaluation of training of teachers in medical education in four medical schools of Nepal.尼泊尔四所医学院校医学教育教师培训情况评估。
Nepal Med Coll J. 2007 Sep;9(3):157-61.
3
Adherence to Trained Standards After a Faculty Development Workshop on "Teaching With Simulated Patients".在关于“使用模拟患者进行教学”的教师发展研讨会后对训练标准的遵守情况
GMS J Med Educ. 2017 Oct 16;34(4):Doc45. doi: 10.3205/zma001122. eCollection 2017.
4
Competency-based teacher training: A systematic revision of a proven programme in medical didactics.基于能力的教师培训:医学教学法中一个经过验证的项目的系统修订。
GMS J Med Educ. 2017 Oct 16;34(4):Doc44. doi: 10.3205/zma001121. eCollection 2017.
5
Long-term retention of teaching skills after attending the Teaching Improvement Project: a longitudinal, self-evaluation study.参加教学改进项目后教学技能的长期保持:一项纵向自我评估研究。
Med Teach. 2003 May;25(3):314-8. doi: 10.1080/0142159031000100436.
6
[Effective didactic skills training for teachers in continuing medical education].[继续医学教育中教师有效的教学技能培训]
Rofo. 2005 Sep;177(9):1290-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-858372.
7
Evolving from Didactic to Dialogic: How to Improve Faculty Development and Support Faculty Developers by Using Action Research.从说教式到对话式的转变:如何通过行动研究来改善教师发展并为教师发展者提供支持。
Teach Learn Med. 2024 Apr-May;36(2):211-221. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2023.2204091. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
8
Crisis as a chance. A digital training of social competencies with simulated persons at the Medical Faculty of RWTH Aachen, due to the lack of attendance teaching in the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic.危机即机遇。在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间,由于无法进行现场教学,RWTH Aachen 医学院利用模拟患者开展了数字化社交能力培训。
GMS J Med Educ. 2020 Dec 3;37(7):Doc82. doi: 10.3205/zma001375. eCollection 2020.
9
The Interprofessional Teaching Observation Program: A Faculty Development Workshop on Peer Feedback of Interprofessional Teaching.《跨专业教学观察计划:一个关于同行反馈跨专业教学的教师发展工作坊》
MedEdPORTAL. 2022 Mar 7;18:11231. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11231. eCollection 2022.
10
Teaching behaviors in the cardiac surgery simulation environment.心脏外科模拟环境中的教学行为。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Jan;145(1):45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.111. Epub 2012 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
External post-mortem examination in virtual reality-scalability of a monocentric application.虚拟现实中外检——单中心应用的可扩展性。
Int J Legal Med. 2024 Sep;138(5):1939-1946. doi: 10.1007/s00414-024-03229-9. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
2
Employment of Small-Group Discussions to Ensure the Effective Delivery of Medical Education.采用小组讨论以确保医学教育的有效实施。
Cureus. 2024 Jan 21;16(1):e52655. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52655. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Communication skills training in undergraduate medical education at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin.

本文引用的文献

1
Advancing faculty development in medical education: a systematic review.推进医学教育中的教师发展:系统评价。
Acad Med. 2013 Jul;88(7):1038-45. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318294fd29.
2
Six formats in simulated and standardized patients use, based on experiences of 13 undergraduate medical curricula in Belgium and the Netherlands.采用模拟患者和标准化患者的六种形式,基于比利时和荷兰 13 个本科医学课程的经验。
Med Teach. 2012;34(9):710-6. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.708466.
3
The simulated patient's view on teaching: results from a think aloud study.
柏林夏里特医科大学本科医学教育中的沟通技巧培训。
GMS J Med Educ. 2021 Mar 15;38(3):Doc56. doi: 10.3205/zma001452. eCollection 2021.
4
Faculty development program assists the new faculty in constructing high-quality short answer questions; a quasi-experimental study.教师发展项目协助新教师构建高质量的简答题;一项准实验研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 29;16(3):e0249319. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249319. eCollection 2021.
5
Train the trainer course for general practice trainers in ambulatory care: the Berlin model.门诊护理全科医生培训师培训课程:柏林模式
GMS J Med Educ. 2020 Apr 15;37(3):Doc28. doi: 10.3205/zma001321. eCollection 2020.
6
The International Literature on Teaching Faculty Development in English-Language Journals: A Scoping Review and Recommendations for Core Topics.英文期刊中关于教师教学发展的国际文献:一项范围综述及核心主题建议
J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Aug;11(4 Suppl):47-63. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00174.
7
Faculty Development - Full Steam Ahead!教师发展——全速前进!
GMS J Med Educ. 2017 Oct 16;34(4):Doc50. doi: 10.3205/zma001127. eCollection 2017.
8
Adherence to Trained Standards After a Faculty Development Workshop on "Teaching With Simulated Patients".在关于“使用模拟患者进行教学”的教师发展研讨会后对训练标准的遵守情况
GMS J Med Educ. 2017 Oct 16;34(4):Doc45. doi: 10.3205/zma001122. eCollection 2017.
模拟患者对教学的看法:来自出声思维研究的结果。
Acad Med. 2012 Feb;87(2):179-84. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31823f7105.
4
"Teaching as a Competency": competencies for medical educators.“教学能力”:医学教育者的能力。
Acad Med. 2011 Oct;86(10):1211-20. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822c5b9a.
5
Medical competence: the interplay between individual ability and the health care environment.医学能力:个体能力与医疗保健环境的相互作用。
Med Teach. 2010;32(8):669-75. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.500897.
6
Defining responsibilities of simulated patients in medical education.定义模拟患者在医学教育中的责任。
Simul Healthc. 2010 Jun;5(3):161-8. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181de1cb6.
7
A framework of teaching competencies across the medical education continuum.贯穿医学教育连续体的教学能力框架。
Med Teach. 2009 May;31(5):390-6. doi: 10.1080/01421590902845881.
8
Impact of communication training on physician expression of empathy in patient encounters.沟通培训对医生在患者诊疗过程中表达同理心的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Apr;75(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.09.007. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
9
Faculty development: yesterday, today and tomorrow.教师发展:昨天、今天与明天。
Med Teach. 2008;30(6):555-84. doi: 10.1080/01421590802109834.
10
Training faculty to facilitate communication skills training: development and evaluation of a workshop.培训教员以促进沟通技能培训:一个工作坊的开发与评估
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Mar;70(3):430-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.11.024. Epub 2008 Jan 16.