• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从指导小组的角度看弗赖哈姆(慕尼黑)基于社区的综合预防策略的制定:一项基于社会网络分析的定性访谈研究

[Development of an Integrated Community-Based Prevention Strategy in Freiham (Munich) from the Perspective of the Steering Group: A Qualitative Interview Study with Social Network Analysis].

作者信息

Schöttle Anika, Coenen Michaela, Rehfuess Eva Annette, Kaiser Birgit, Wiedemann Christine, Pfadenhauer Lisa M

机构信息

Lehrstuhl für Public Health und Versorgungsforschung, Institut für Medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.

Pettenkofer School of Public Health, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.

出版信息

Gesundheitswesen. 2023 May;85(5):e16-e31. doi: 10.1055/a-1815-3254. Epub 2022 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1055/a-1815-3254
PMID:35654400
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11248016/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The City of Munich is planning and implementing a "Prevention Chain" as an integrated community-based prevention strategy in the new district of "Freiham" in Munich. This is taking place while the district is being built. The "Prevention Chain Freiham" aims to create an environment that enables a healthy upbringing of all children and adolescents right from the start. In order to guide this project, an interdepartmental working group was formed within the City of Munich's administration. This study analyses the working group's structures, processes and its collaboration with a variety of stakeholders.

METHODS

We conducted a multimethod study comprising qualitative interviews and social network analysis. Between March and April 2018, we conducted semi-structured interviews with members of the working group. The study participants also generated ego-centred social network maps. The transcripts were analysed using qualitative content analysis as described by Schreier. The network maps were also analysed using qualitative content analysis and the results were visualized. Our preliminary findings were interpreted, discussed and validated in a workshop in June 2018 with study participants.

RESULTS

Ten members of the working group participated in the study. The interdepartmental, multiprofessional collaboration in the working group was perceived as beneficial for the process of developing and implementing the Prevention Chain. The external coordination by MAGs and the scientific expertise provided by the LMU Munich were considered highly supportive. Barriers to the planning and implementation of the Prevention Chain were mainly located at administration level. Most facilitators were attributed to the collaborative processes within the working group. After having mapped all stakeholders currently involved in the Prevention Chain (mainly actors within the City of Munich's administration), additional relevant stakeholders were identified by the members of the working group.

CONCLUSION

The organizational form of the working group as a formalized association of representatives of various departments that are jointly responsible for the Prevention Chain is considered beneficial for the success of the Prevention Chain. This is further supported by the external coordination and academic support. Advancing the development and implementation of the Prevention Chain will require support from all relevant departments across sectors and hierarchies.

摘要

背景

慕尼黑市正在规划并实施一项“预防链”计划,作为慕尼黑新城区“弗赖哈姆”基于社区的综合预防策略。该计划在城区建设期间开展。“弗赖哈姆预防链”旨在营造一种环境,使所有儿童和青少年从一开始就能在健康的环境中成长。为指导该项目,慕尼黑市行政部门内部成立了一个跨部门工作组。本研究分析了该工作组的结构、流程及其与各类利益相关者的合作情况。

方法

我们开展了一项多方法研究,包括定性访谈和社会网络分析。2018年3月至4月期间,我们对工作组成员进行了半结构化访谈。研究参与者还绘制了以自我为中心的社会网络图。使用施赖尔描述的定性内容分析法对访谈记录进行分析。对社会网络图也采用定性内容分析法进行分析,并将结果可视化。2018年6月,我们与研究参与者在一次研讨会上对初步研究结果进行了解释、讨论和验证。

结果

十名工作组成员参与了本研究。工作组内跨部门、多专业的合作被认为对“预防链”的制定和实施过程有益。由MAGs进行的外部协调以及慕尼黑大学提供的科学专业知识被认为具有很大的支持作用。“预防链”规划和实施的障碍主要存在于行政层面。大多数促进因素归因于工作组内部的协作过程。在绘制了目前参与“预防链”的所有利益相关者(主要是慕尼黑市行政部门内部的行为主体)之后,工作组成员又确定了其他相关利益者。

结论

工作组作为一个由共同负责“预防链”的各部门代表组成的正式协会的组织形式,被认为对“预防链”的成功有益。外部协调和学术支持进一步证明了这一点。推进“预防链”的发展和实施需要跨部门、跨层级的所有相关部门的支持。

相似文献

1
[Development of an Integrated Community-Based Prevention Strategy in Freiham (Munich) from the Perspective of the Steering Group: A Qualitative Interview Study with Social Network Analysis].从指导小组的角度看弗赖哈姆(慕尼黑)基于社区的综合预防策略的制定:一项基于社会网络分析的定性访谈研究
Gesundheitswesen. 2023 May;85(5):e16-e31. doi: 10.1055/a-1815-3254. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
2
Process evaluation of an integrated community-based intervention for promoting health equity in children in a new residential development area.对一个新住宅区促进儿童健康公平的综合社区干预措施进行过程评估。
Arch Public Health. 2024 Feb 6;82(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01246-z.
3
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
4
Multi-level stakeholders' perspectives on implementation and scaling up community-based health promotion in Germany.多层次利益相关者对德国社区健康促进实施和扩大的看法。
Health Promot Int. 2023 Jun 1;38(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad045.
5
What are the anticipated benefits, risks, barriers and facilitators to implementing person-centred outcome measures into routine care for children and young people with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions? A qualitative interview study with key stakeholders.将以患者为中心的结局测量指标纳入到对患有危及生命疾病的儿童和青少年的常规护理中,预期会有哪些获益、风险、障碍和促进因素?一项针对主要利益相关者的定性访谈研究。
Palliat Med. 2024 Apr;38(4):471-484. doi: 10.1177/02692163241234797. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
6
[Facilitators and Challenges of Community-based Prevention Programmes for Children - Results of a Qualitative Study].
Gesundheitswesen. 2020 Mar;82(3):e24-e38. doi: 10.1055/a-1007-8641. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
7
Capitalizing on facilitators and addressing barriers when implementing active tuberculosis case-finding in six districts of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: a qualitative study with key stakeholders.利用促进因素并解决障碍,在越南胡志明市的六个区实施活动性肺结核病例发现:与主要利益攸关方的定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2021 May 19;16(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01124-0.
8
Barriers to and facilitators for implementing quality improvements in palliative care - results from a qualitative interview study in Norway.挪威一项质性访谈研究的结果:姑息治疗质量改进的障碍与促进因素
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Jul 15;15:61. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0132-5.
9
A stakeholder analysis of community-led collaboration to reduce health inequity in a deprived neighbourhood in South Korea.社区主导合作减少韩国贫困社区健康不平等的利益相关者分析。
Glob Health Promot. 2020 Jun;27(2):35-44. doi: 10.1177/1757975918791517. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
10
Collaborative health service planning: A stakeholder analysis with social network analysis to develop a community pharmacy service.协同式卫生服务规划:利用社会网络分析制定社区药房服务的利益相关者分析。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Feb;16(2):216-229. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Process evaluation of an integrated community-based intervention for promoting health equity in children in a new residential development area.对一个新住宅区促进儿童健康公平的综合社区干预措施进行过程评估。
Arch Public Health. 2024 Feb 6;82(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01246-z.

本文引用的文献

1
[Health in All Policies - Developments, Priorities and Strategies for Germany].
Gesundheitswesen. 2020 Jul;82(7):e72-e76. doi: 10.1055/a-1138-0389. Epub 2020 May 11.
2
Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework.理解情境与实施中的复杂性:复杂干预措施的情境与实施(CICI)框架
Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 15;12(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0552-5.
3
Research agenda for integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in healthcare: what we know and do not yet know.医疗保健领域综合知识转化(IKT)的研究议程:我们已知与未知的内容。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Feb;71(2):105-106. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-207743. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
4
Social network analysis for program implementation.用于项目实施的社会网络分析
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 25;10(6):e0131712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131712. eCollection 2015.
5
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance.复杂干预措施的过程评估:医学研究委员会指南。
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.
6
Inter-organizational collaboration in the implementation of evidence-based practices among public agencies serving abused and neglected youth.在为受虐待和被忽视的青少年提供服务的公共机构中,实施循证实践方面的组织间合作。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2014 Jan;41(1):74-85. doi: 10.1007/s10488-012-0437-5.
7
Partnerships for the design, conduct, and analysis of effectiveness, and implementation research: experiences of the prevention science and methodology group.合作设计、实施和分析有效性和实施研究:预防科学和方法学小组的经验。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012 Jul;39(4):301-16. doi: 10.1007/s10488-011-0387-3.
8
When are complex interventions 'complex'? When are simple interventions 'simple'?复杂干预何时“复杂”?简单干预又何时“简单”?
Eur J Public Health. 2011 Aug;21(4):397-8. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckr084.
9
Defining knowledge translation.定义知识转化。
CMAJ. 2009 Aug 4;181(3-4):165-8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081229. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
10
Integrating children's services in England: national evaluation of children's trusts.整合英格兰的儿童服务:对儿童信托基金的全国评估。
Child Care Health Dev. 2009 Mar;35(2):257-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00928.x. Epub 2009 Jan 14.