• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
"I'm not terribly lonely": Advancing the understanding of intimacy among older adults.“我并不十分孤独”:增进对老年人亲密关系的理解。
J Aging Stud. 2022 Jun;61:101005. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2022.101005. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
2
Iatrogenic loneliness and loss of intimacy in residential care.在养老院中产生的医源性孤独和亲密感的丧失。
Nurs Ethics. 2021 Sep;28(6):911-923. doi: 10.1177/0969733020983394. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
3
Negotiating the Lack of Intimacy in Assisted Living: Resident Desires, Barriers, and Strategies.协商辅助生活中的缺乏亲密关系:居民的愿望、障碍和策略。
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Jan;39(1):28-39. doi: 10.1177/0733464817746756. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
4
Sexuality and intimacy among people with serious mental illness: a qualitative systematic review.严重精神疾病患者的性与亲密关系:一项定性系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 Jan;17(1):74-125. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003824.
5
Limiting and Promoting Resident Self-Care in Assisted Living.限制和促进辅助生活中的居民自我护理。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Sep 13;76(8):1664-1672. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab016.
6
Palliative Care, Intimacy, and Sexual Expression in the Older Adult Residential Care Context: "Living until You Don't".老年长期护理环境中的姑息治疗、亲密关系和性表达:“活至不能”。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 12;19(20):13080. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013080.
7
Nurses' experiences and reactions towards intimacy and sexuality expressions by nursing home residents: A qualitative study.护士对养老院居民表达亲密和性的体验和反应:一项定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Mar;28(5-6):836-849. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14680. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
8
Nurses' perceptions regarding providing psychological care for older residents in long-term care facilities: A qualitative study.护士对长期护理机构中老年人提供心理关怀的看法:一项定性研究。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2019 Sep;14(3):e12242. doi: 10.1111/opn.12242. Epub 2019 May 9.
9
Sexual expression and the COVID-19 pandemic: The future of sexual intimacy after the COVID-19 pandemic.性行为与 COVID-19 大流行:COVID-19 大流行后性亲密的未来。
Psychiatriki. 2023 Jul 19;34(2):99-101. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2023.009. Epub 2023 May 12.
10
Sexuality and Intimacy in Assisted Living: Residents' Perspectives and Experiences.辅助生活中的性与亲密关系:居民的观点与经历
Sex Res Social Policy. 2009 Dec 1;6(4):25-37. doi: 10.1525/srsp.2009.6.4.25.

引用本文的文献

1
Sexuality in Older Adults: Comprehensive Strategies for Clinicians and Patient-Centered Care.老年人的性健康:临床医生的综合策略与以患者为中心的护理
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2024 Oct 18:15598276241293100. doi: 10.1177/15598276241293100.

本文引用的文献

1
"They're in My Heart, Mind, and Cells": What Continuing Bonds Reveal About Social Networks.“他们在我的心中、脑海和细胞里”:持续联系揭示的社会网络。
Gerontologist. 2020 Aug 14;60(6):1085-1093. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz188.
2
Variety Is the Spice of Late Life: Social Integration and Daily Activity.多样化是晚年生活的调味品:社会融合与日常活动。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Jan 14;75(2):377-388. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbz007.
3
Individualization and the Health Care Mosaic in Assisted Living.个性化与辅助生活中的医疗马赛克。
Gerontologist. 2019 Jul 16;59(4):644-654. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny065.
4
Maneuvering Together, Apart, and at Odds: Residents' Care Convoys in Assisted Living.协同、分离还是冲突:辅助生活中的居民护理队。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2018 Apr 16;73(4):e13-e23. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx184.
5
Negotiating the Lack of Intimacy in Assisted Living: Resident Desires, Barriers, and Strategies.协商辅助生活中的缺乏亲密关系:居民的愿望、障碍和策略。
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Jan;39(1):28-39. doi: 10.1177/0733464817746756. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
6
Exposing the Backstage: Critical Reflections on a Longitudinal Qualitative Study of Residents' Care Networks in Assisted Living.揭开幕后:对辅助生活中居民护理网络的纵向定性研究的批判性反思
Qual Health Res. 2017 Jul;27(8):1190-1202. doi: 10.1177/1049732316668817. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
7
Understanding Sexual Freedom and Autonomy in Assisted Living: Discourse of Residents' Rights Among Staff and Administrators.理解辅助生活中的性自由与自主权:员工和管理人员关于居民权利的论述
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2017 May 1;72(3):457-467. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbw068.
8
Couples' Social Careers in Assisted Living: Reconciling Individual and Shared Situations.夫妻在辅助生活中的社会经历:协调个人与共同处境
Gerontologist. 2016 Oct;56(5):841-54. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv025. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
9
Sexuality and Intimacy in Assisted Living: Residents' Perspectives and Experiences.辅助生活中的性与亲密关系:居民的观点与经历
Sex Res Social Policy. 2009 Dec 1;6(4):25-37. doi: 10.1525/srsp.2009.6.4.25.
10
Coming together and pulling apart: Exploring the influence of functional status on co-resident relationships in assisted living.聚在一起又分开:探索功能状态对辅助生活中共同居住关系的影响。
J Aging Stud. 2013 Dec;27(4):317-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Aug 23.

“我并不十分孤独”:增进对老年人亲密关系的理解。

"I'm not terribly lonely": Advancing the understanding of intimacy among older adults.

机构信息

Oxford College of Emory University, United States of America.

Gerontology Institute, Georgia State University, Georgia.

出版信息

J Aging Stud. 2022 Jun;61:101005. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2022.101005. Epub 2022 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaging.2022.101005
PMID:35654540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9163450/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Intimacy, a social relationship component, continues to be essential in later life, including for older adults in long-term care such as assisted living. Yet, no previous study has conceptualized how individuals experience intimacy holistically (i.e., broadly defined) and within the context of later life, health decline, and long-term care. The purpose of this analysis was to provide an in-depth understanding of intimacy in the lives of older adults in assisted living.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Using grounded theory methods, we analyzed data from the "Convoys of Care" (Kemp, PI: R01AG044368) longitudinal, qualitative research project. Data consisted of 2224 h of participant observation and interviews with 28 assisted living residents (aged 58-96), and their care partners (n = 114) followed over two years from four diverse assisted living communities.

RESULTS

Residents' experience with intimacy was a process involving four dimensions: emotional, intellectual, spiritual, and physical. Intimacy occurred in platonic or romantic forms and was dynamic over time alongside residents' intimacy needs. Residents engaged in an ongoing process requiring that they manage their needs while negotiating intimacy opportunities and constraints.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Our findings expand the current conceptualization of intimacy in later life, specifically in the context of long-term care. Findings indicate the need for an approach to long-term care that addresses individuals' intimacy needs and preferences.

摘要

背景与目的

亲密关系是一种社会关系,在晚年生活中仍然至关重要,包括在长期护理机构(如辅助生活机构)中的老年人。然而,以前的研究尚未全面(即广义上定义)和在晚年、健康衰退和长期护理的背景下,概念化个体如何体验亲密关系。本分析的目的是深入了解辅助生活中的老年人的亲密关系。

研究设计与方法

使用扎根理论方法,我们分析了“护理车队”(Kemp,PI:R01AG044368)纵向、定性研究项目的数据。数据包括 28 名辅助生活居民(年龄 58-96 岁)和他们的护理伙伴(n=114)的 2224 小时的参与观察和访谈,这些居民在来自四个不同辅助生活社区的两年时间内接受了随访。

结果

居民的亲密关系体验是一个涉及四个维度的过程:情感、智力、精神和身体。亲密关系以柏拉图式或浪漫的形式存在,并随着居民的亲密关系需求而随时间动态变化。居民参与了一个持续的过程,需要他们在协商亲密关系机会和限制的同时管理自己的需求。

讨论与意义

我们的发现扩展了对晚年亲密关系的当前概念化,特别是在长期护理的背景下。研究结果表明,需要一种针对长期护理的方法来满足个人的亲密关系需求和偏好。