• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甲氧氯普胺与氟哌利多/苯巴比妥治疗化疗所致呕吐的比较。

A comparison of metoclopramide vs. droperidol/phenobarbital for emesis induced by chemotherapy.

作者信息

Gumbart C H, Sorensen S H, Bickers J N

出版信息

Am J Med Sci. 1987 Feb;293(2):90-3. doi: 10.1097/00000441-198702000-00004.

DOI:10.1097/00000441-198702000-00004
PMID:3565458
Abstract

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting cause morbidity and poor compliance among patients receiving intensive cancer chemotherapy. High-dose antiemetic regimens, while effective, add significantly to the cost of treatment. This study compares the efficacy and cost of high-dose metoclopramide with a combination of phenobarbital and droperidol. All patients treated were naive to prior chemotherapy, and all patients received treatment regimens containing cisplatinum. Both antiemetic regimens proved equally efficacious in suppressing emesis, but the phenobarbital/droperidol combination achieved a 100-fold decrease in cost.

摘要

化疗引起的恶心和呕吐会导致接受强化癌症化疗的患者出现发病情况且依从性较差。高剂量止吐方案虽然有效,但会显著增加治疗成本。本研究比较了高剂量甲氧氯普胺与苯巴比妥和氟哌利多联合使用的疗效和成本。所有接受治疗的患者之前均未接受过化疗,且所有患者均接受了含顺铂的治疗方案。两种止吐方案在抑制呕吐方面均证明同样有效,但苯巴比妥/氟哌利多联合使用使成本降低了100倍。

相似文献

1
A comparison of metoclopramide vs. droperidol/phenobarbital for emesis induced by chemotherapy.甲氧氯普胺与氟哌利多/苯巴比妥治疗化疗所致呕吐的比较。
Am J Med Sci. 1987 Feb;293(2):90-3. doi: 10.1097/00000441-198702000-00004.
2
Antiemetic efficacy of high-dose corticosteroids and droperidol in cisplatin-induced emesis: a controlled trial with droperidol and metoclopramide.大剂量皮质类固醇和氟哌利多对顺铂所致呕吐的止吐疗效:一项氟哌利多与甲氧氯普胺对照试验
Gynecol Oncol. 1984 Jul;18(3):320-5. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(84)90043-x.
3
Comparison of four antiemetic regimens for the treatment of cisplatin-induced vomiting.四种止吐方案治疗顺铂所致呕吐的比较。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1993 Jul;42(1):19-24. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(93)90440-8.
4
Combination antiemetics for cisplatin chemotherapy.顺铂化疗的联合止吐药
Cancer. 1988 Apr 15;61(8):1508-17. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19880415)61:8<1508::aid-cncr2820610806>3.0.co;2-h.
5
[The prevention of CDDP-induced emesis with a combination regimen including metoclopramide, dexamethasone, droperidol and diphenhydramine].[采用包括甲氧氯普胺、地塞米松、氟哌利多和苯海拉明的联合方案预防顺铂引起的呕吐]
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1987 Nov;39(11):1968-72.
6
Comparison of metoclopramide and metoclopramide plus dexamethasone for complete protection from cisplatinum-induced emesis.
Cancer Invest. 1986;4(5):379-85. doi: 10.3109/07357908609017518.
7
Comparison of ondansetron with metoclopramide in prevention of acute emesis associated with low dose & high dose cisplatin chemotherapy.昂丹司琼与胃复安预防低剂量及高剂量顺铂化疗所致急性呕吐的比较。
Indian J Med Res. 2003 Jul;118:33-41.
8
High-dose metoclopramide + lorazepam versus low-dose metoclopramide + lorazepam + dehydrobenzperidol in the treatment of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting.高剂量甲氧氯普胺+劳拉西泮与低剂量甲氧氯普胺+劳拉西泮+脱氢苯哌啶治疗顺铂所致恶心和呕吐的比较
Ann Oncol. 1991 Mar;2(3):223-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a057911.
9
Metoclopramide versus metoclopramide and lorazepam. Superiority of combined therapy in the control of cisplatin-induced emesis.甲氧氯普胺与甲氧氯普胺和劳拉西泮比较。联合治疗在控制顺铂所致呕吐方面的优势。
Cancer. 1989 Feb 1;63(3):578-82. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19890201)63:3<578::aid-cncr2820630330>3.0.co;2-z.
10
High doses of metoclopramide or droperidol in the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis.高剂量甲氧氯普胺或氟哌利多预防顺铂所致呕吐
Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1986 Oct;22(10):1199-203. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(86)90321-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Mandibular fracture and necrotizing sialometaplasia in a rabbit.兔下颌骨骨折与坏死性涎腺化生
Comp Med. 2013 Feb;63(1):67-70.
2
[Management of chemotherapy-induced emesis: what is the standard after 20 years of clinical research].[化疗引起的呕吐的管理:经过20年临床研究后何为标准]
Med Klin (Munich). 1998 Jan;93 Suppl 1:3-17. doi: 10.1007/BF03041988.