• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加速提升地方公共卫生专业人员解决问题的能力:数字化免疫培训干预的评估。

Accelerating problem-solving capacities of sub-national public health professionals: an evaluation of a digital immunization training intervention.

机构信息

Learning, Leadership and Organization Development Program, Mary Frances Early College of Education, University of Georgia, 850 College Station Rd, Athens, GA, USA.

College of Public Health, University of Georgia, 100 Foster Rd, Athens, GA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 2;22(1):736. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08138-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-022-08138-4
PMID:35655276
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9161754/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This article reports an evaluation of the Immunization Training Challenge Hackathons (ITCH), invented by The Geneva Learning Foundation (TGLF) for national and sub-national immunization staff who strive to develop the knowledge and capacity of others to improve immunization program performance. ITCH, a fully-digital program focused on networked collaborative problem-solving between peers, provided an "opt-in" activity for learners in the Teach to Reach (T2R) Accelerator Program designed to improve training effectiveness in the immunization sphere.

METHODS

Conducted by a team from the University of Georgia, this mixed method evaluation consisted of thematic analysis of recorded sessions and open-ended comments; and statistical analyses of application and follow-up survey data. The evaluation focused on what was learned and how ITCH participants implemented what they learned. Key stakeholder interviews provided supplemental data about program intent and results. ITCH consisted of 17 30-min sessions held in 2020, in English and French, with 581 participating at least once out of 1,454 enrolled in the overall program. Challenge owners and respondents came from 15 African and Asian countries and spanned different roles with differing scope.

RESULTS

Over 85% [n = 154] of survey respondents [n = 181, a 31% response rate] indicated they were able to implement what they learned from the ITCH sessions. A majority [n = 139, 76.7%] reported finding the sessions useful. Issues with poor connectivity and the timing of the live meetings impeded some in their ability to participate, a problem compounded by consequences of the pandemic. The ITCH process constituted of learning or coming to consciousness simultaneously of four types of learning - participants realizing how much they could learn from each other (peer learning), experiencing the power of defying distance to solve problems together (remote learning), and feeling a growing sense of belonging to a community (social learning), emergent across country borders and health system levels (networked learning).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on evaluation findings, it was concluded that ITCH demonstrated an effective scalable, informal, non-didactic, experience-led, fast-paced, peer learning design. A focus on community engagement and developing brokering skills was recommended.

摘要

背景

本文报告了免疫培训挑战赛黑客松(ITCH)的评估结果,该活动由日内瓦学习基金会(TGLF)为国家和次国家免疫工作人员设计,旨在培养他们向他人传授知识和能力的能力,从而提高免疫规划的绩效。ITCH 是一个完全数字化的项目,专注于同行之间的网络协作式问题解决,为旨在提高免疫领域培训效果的“教学促进计划”(T2R)加速项目中的学习者提供了一项“选择加入”活动。

方法

由佐治亚大学的一个团队进行的这项混合方法评估包括对记录会议和开放式评论的主题分析;以及对应用程序和后续调查数据的统计分析。评估重点关注参与者学到了什么以及他们如何实施所学内容。主要利益相关者访谈提供了有关项目意图和结果的补充数据。ITCH 由 2020 年举行的 17 次 30 分钟会议组成,使用英语和法语,共有 1454 名参与者,其中 581 名至少参加过一次。挑战赛的所有者和参与者来自 15 个非洲和亚洲国家,涵盖了不同角色和不同范围。

结果

超过 85%[n=154]的调查受访者[n=181,响应率为 31%]表示他们能够实施从 ITCH 会议中学到的内容。大多数[n=139,76.7%]表示会议很有用。较差的网络连接和实时会议的时间安排问题阻碍了一些人的参与能力,而大流行的后果则使问题更加复杂。ITCH 过程包括同时学习或意识到四种类型的学习——参与者意识到彼此可以相互学习的程度(同伴学习)、体验一起克服距离解决问题的力量(远程学习)、以及对跨越国界和卫生系统级别的社区的归属感(社会学习),这些学习在社区中涌现。

结论

基于评估结果,可以得出结论,ITCH 展示了一种有效的可扩展、非正式、非说教、以经验为导向、快节奏、同伴学习设计。建议注重社区参与和培养中介技能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff42/9165571/7dbe2311777d/12913_2022_8138_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff42/9165571/7dbe2311777d/12913_2022_8138_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff42/9165571/7dbe2311777d/12913_2022_8138_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Accelerating problem-solving capacities of sub-national public health professionals: an evaluation of a digital immunization training intervention.加速提升地方公共卫生专业人员解决问题的能力:数字化免疫培训干预的评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 2;22(1):736. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08138-4.
2
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Evaluation of a national training programme to support engagement in mental health services: Learning enablers and learning gains.评估一个支持参与心理健康服务的国家培训计划:学习促进因素和学习收益。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Nov;26(9-10):323-336. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12535. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
Evaluation of a virtual, simulated international public health peer-to-peer exchange learning experience.虚拟模拟国际公共卫生同行交流学习体验的评估。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 13;11:1144716. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1144716. eCollection 2023.
7
[Efficiency of a gambling prevention program for youths: results from the pilot study].[一项针对青少年的预防赌博项目的成效:试点研究结果]
Encephale. 2005 Jul-Aug;31(4 Pt 1):427-36. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82404-2.
8
Training evaluation: a case study of training Iranian health managers.培训评估:以伊朗卫生管理人员培训为例
Hum Resour Health. 2009 Mar 5;7:20. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-7-20.
9
Immunization review meetings: "Low Hanging Fruit" for capacity building and data quality improvement?免疫接种审查会议:能力建设和数据质量改进的“低垂果实”?
Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Jun 22;27(Suppl 3):21. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2017.27.3.11516. eCollection 2017.
10
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards a sustainable model for a digital learning network in support of the Immunization Agenda 2030 -a mixed methods study with a transdisciplinary component.迈向支持2030年免疫议程的数字学习网络可持续模式——一项包含跨学科部分的混合方法研究
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Dec 31;4(12):e0003855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003855. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Problematic problem diagnostics: why digital health interventions for community health workers do not always achieve their desired impact.有问题的问题诊断:为何针对社区卫生工作者的数字健康干预措施并不总是能达到预期效果。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jul;6(Suppl 5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005942.
2
Pre- and in-service training of health care workers on immunization data management in LMICs: a scoping review.中低收入国家中卫生工作者免疫数据管理的岗前和在职培训:范围综述。
Hum Resour Health. 2019 Dec 2;17(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12960-019-0437-6.
3
The future of routine immunization in the developing world: challenges and opportunities.
发展中国家常规免疫的未来:挑战与机遇。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014 Dec 10;2(4):381-94. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00137.
4
Collaborative evaluation within a framework of stakeholder-oriented evaluation approaches.在以利益相关者为导向的评估方法框架内进行合作评估。
Eval Program Plann. 2012 Nov;35(4):518-22. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
5
How can we achieve and maintain high-quality performance of health workers in low-resource settings?在资源匮乏的环境中,我们如何实现并维持卫生工作者的高质量绩效?
Lancet. 2005;366(9490):1026-35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67028-6.