Eichler Rachel, Mivtachi Gila, Hershkovitz-Azoulay Dina, Scheiman Mitchell, Ben-Eli Hadas
Department of Optometry and Vision Science, Hadassah Academic College, Jerusalem, Israel.
Pennsylvania College of Optometry, Salus University, Elkins Park, PA, USA.
Clin Optom (Auckl). 2022 May 27;14:75-81. doi: 10.2147/OPTO.S364516. eCollection 2022.
To provide additional normative data for the OculoMotor Assessment Tool (OMAT) for horizontal and vertical saccades and vergence jumps and to compare the results of children to adults.
Participants with visual acuity of logMAR ≥0.0 (6/6) and Randot stereopsis of at least 250 sec of arc without binocular disorders were recruited. Horizontal and vertical saccades, near point of convergence (NPC), accommodation and vergence jumps were evaluated using the OMAT. Means and standard deviations were reported for all parameters in children and adults.
A total of 52 participants (ages 9-34, mean age 17.5 ± 7.2 years) participated in this study. Statistically significant differences were found for horizontal and vertical saccades with lower mean results in children, aged 9-18 (111.5 ± 20.9 and 112.5 ± 22.7, respectively) compared to adults, aged 19-34 (131.6 ± 23.9 and 126.2 ± 24.2, respectively) (P = 0.002 and 0.04, respectively). The mean of the last 30 seconds of both horizontal and vertical saccades were statistically significantly lower in the children's group (52.5 ± 10.6 and 52.1 ± 11.3, respectively) compared to the adults (63.2 ± 10.2 and 59.3 ± 13.4, respectively) (P = 0.001 and 0.04, respectively). The normative values for horizontal and vertical saccades were 119.6 ± 23.9 and 118.1 ± 24.1 saccades per minute, respectively. NPC break and recovery were 2.3 ± 2.3cm and 3.0 ± 3.3cm, respectively. The vergence jumps assessment was 79.3 ± 21.19 movements per minute.
Normative values for the OMAT test were found in this study for children and adults. Assessment of endurance found children norms significantly lower for horizontal and vertical saccades compared to adults.
为眼动评估工具（OMAT）的水平和垂直扫视以及聚散跳提供更多规范数据，并比较儿童与成人的结果。
招募视力对数最小分辨角（logMAR）≥0.0（6/6）且随机立体视至少为250角秒且无双眼疾病的参与者。使用OMAT评估水平和垂直扫视、集合近点（NPC）、调节和聚散跳。报告了儿童和成人所有参数的均值和标准差。
共有52名参与者（年龄9 - 34岁，平均年龄17.5±7.2岁）参与了本研究。发现水平和垂直扫视存在统计学显著差异，9 - 18岁儿童的平均结果较低（分别为111.5±20.9和11第十二章五±22.7），而19 - 34岁成人的平均结果分别为131.6±23.9和126.2±24.2（P分别为0.002和0.04）。儿童组水平和垂直扫视最后30秒的均值在统计学上显著低于成人（分别为52.5±10.6和52.1±11.3），而成人分别为63.2±10.2和59.3±13.4（P分别为0.001和0.04）。水平和垂直扫视的规范值分别为每分钟119.6±23.9次和118.1±24.1次。NPC的分开和恢复分别为2.3±2.3厘米和3.0±3.3厘米。聚散跳评估为每分钟79.3±21.19次运动。
本研究得出了儿童和成人的OMAT测试规范值。耐力评估发现儿童水平和垂直扫视的规范值显著低于成人。
