• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低温等离子体消融术与半导体激光扁桃体切除术:一项对比研究。

Coblation Versus Diode Laser Tonsillectomy: A Comparative Study.

作者信息

Alaqeedy Ameer A, Al-Ani Raid M, Rashid Rasheed Ali

机构信息

Department of Surgery/Otolaryngology, College of Medicine, University of Anbar, Ramadi city, Iraq.

Department of Surgery/Otolaryngology, College of Medicine, Tikrit University, Tikrit city, Iraq.

出版信息

Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Mar;34(121):113-120. doi: 10.22038/IJORL.2021.56901.2961.

DOI:10.22038/IJORL.2021.56901.2961
PMID:35655771
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9119337/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The study aimed to compare the intra-individual 2 procedures of tonsillectomy (Coblation and diode laser) concerning the operative time, the amount of blood loss, postoperative pain, and other complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comparative study was conducted at many Private Hospitals, Baghdad, Iraq from February 2019- February 2020. Coblation and diode laser tonsillectomy were performed on the same patient (one for each side) which was blinded to the patients or their caregivers and the surgeon who did the tonsillectomy. A double blinded randomization process of 1 to 1 of these two procedures according to the side involved was performed. Data concerning the age, gender, indications for tonsillectomy, operative time, the amount of the blood loss, post-tonsillectomy pain by VAS scores, and other complications were recorded for each patient.

RESULTS

Out of 62 participants, there were 34 (54.8%) females. The majority were from the age group ≤18 years (n = 54, 87.1%). The operative time and amount of the intraoperative blood loss were significantly lower in the Coblation than a diode laser tonsillectomy. However, the postoperative pain scores in the diode laser were a statistically significant difference less than the Coblation group at the periods 3 hours, 8 hours, 24 hours, and 7 days (P-value < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Coblation was better than diode laser because of shorter operative time and less intraoperative blood loss. However, the diode laser technique had lesser postoperative pain at the postoperative periods 3 hours, 8 hours, 24 hours, and 7 days than Coblation.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在比较扁桃体切除术的两种个体内手术方法(低温等离子消融术和半导体激光)在手术时间、失血量、术后疼痛及其他并发症方面的差异。

材料与方法

2019年2月至2020年2月在伊拉克巴格达的多家私立医院进行了一项对比研究。对同一患者(每侧各进行一种手术)实施低温等离子消融术和半导体激光扁桃体切除术,患者、其护理人员及实施扁桃体切除术的外科医生均不知情。根据受累侧别,对这两种手术方法进行1:1的双盲随机分配。记录每位患者的年龄、性别、扁桃体切除指征、手术时间、失血量、采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估的扁桃体切除术后疼痛情况及其他并发症。

结果

62名参与者中,女性有34名(54.8%)。大多数患者年龄≤18岁(n = 54,87.1%)。低温等离子消融术的手术时间和术中失血量显著低于半导体激光扁桃体切除术。然而,在术后3小时、8小时、24小时和7天时,半导体激光组的术后疼痛评分在统计学上显著低于低温等离子消融术组(P值<0.05)。

结论

低温等离子消融术优于半导体激光,因其手术时间更短,术中失血量更少。然而,在术后3小时、8小时、24小时和7天时,半导体激光技术引起的术后疼痛比低温等离子消融术轻。

相似文献

1
Coblation Versus Diode Laser Tonsillectomy: A Comparative Study.低温等离子体消融术与半导体激光扁桃体切除术:一项对比研究。
Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Mar;34(121):113-120. doi: 10.22038/IJORL.2021.56901.2961.
2
A randomised controlled trial of coblation, diode laser and cold dissection in paediatric tonsillectomy.一项关于小儿扁桃体切除术中使用低温等离子刀、半导体激光和冷剥离术的随机对照试验。
J Laryngol Otol. 2015 Nov;129(11):1058-63. doi: 10.1017/S0022215115002376. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
3
Coblation versus other surgical techniques for tonsillectomy.用于扁桃体切除术的低温等离子消融术与其他手术技术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 22;8(8):CD004619. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004619.pub3.
4
Coblation tonsillectomy versus dissection tonsillectomy: a comparison of intraoperative time, intraoperative blood loss and post-operative pain.低温等离子扁桃体切除术与剥离扁桃体切除术:术中时间、术中出血量及术后疼痛的比较
Med J Malaysia. 2014 Apr;69(2):74-8.
5
Coblation tonsillectomy: a prospective, double-blind, randomised, clinical and histopathological comparison with dissection-ligation, monopolar electrocautery and laser tonsillectomies.低温等离子体扁桃体切除术:与剥离结扎术、单极电烙术和激光扁桃体切除术的前瞻性、双盲、随机临床及组织病理学比较
J Laryngol Otol. 2008 Mar;122(3):282-90. doi: 10.1017/S002221510700093X. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
6
Traditional and Coblation Tonsillectomy in Pediatrics Population: A Comparative Study.儿科人群中传统扁桃体切除术与低温等离子扁桃体切除术的比较研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec;74(Suppl 3):6414-6421. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-01874-1. Epub 2020 May 8.
7
Comparison of Clinical and Functional Outcome of Cold Steel Dissection versus Coblation Technique in Tonsillectomy.扁桃体切除术中冷钢剥离术与低温等离子消融术的临床及功能结局比较
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2022 Mar 13;19(4):820-823. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v19i04.3961.
8
A Comparative Study Between Coblation-Assisted Tonsillectomy and Conventional Dissection and Snare Tonsillectomy.等离子辅助扁桃体切除术与传统剥离加圈套器扁桃体切除术的比较研究
Cureus. 2024 Aug 31;16(8):e68281. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68281. eCollection 2024 Aug.
9
Coblation tonsillectomy versus laser tonsillectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.低温等离子扁桃体切除术与激光扁桃体切除术的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Dec;279(12):5511-5520. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07534-0. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
10
Surgical Management of Bilateral Abductor Paralysis: Diode Laser Versus Coblation; A Prospective Study.双侧外展肌麻痹的手术治疗:二极管激光与低温等离子消融术对比;一项前瞻性研究
J Voice. 2023 Nov 1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.10.008.

本文引用的文献

1
A Comparative Analysis of Outcomes of Conventional Cold Dissection Versus Laser Tonsillectomy in Pediatric Cases in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Haryana.哈里亚纳邦一家三级护理医院儿科常规冷刀扁桃体切除术与激光扁桃体切除术结果的比较分析
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec;74(Suppl 3):5311-5318. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-02301-1. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
2
Lasers in Tonsillectomy: Revisited With Systematic Review.激光扁桃体切除术:系统评价回顾。
Ear Nose Throat J. 2021 Feb;100(1_suppl):14S-18S. doi: 10.1177/0145561320961747. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
3
Efficacy Of Prophylactic Antibiotics In Reducing Posttonsillectomy Haemorrhage.预防性抗生素在减少扁桃体切除术后出血方面的疗效
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2020 Jan-Mar;32(1):94-98.
4
Harmonic Scalpel Versus Coblation Tonsillectomy A Comparative Study.谐波手术刀与低温等离子体扁桃体切除术的对比研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Dec;71(4):498-503. doi: 10.1007/s12070-019-01679-x. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
5
Coblation tonsillectomy versus coblation tonsillectomy with ties in adults.成人中,低温等离子体扁桃体切除术与带结扎的低温等离子体扁桃体切除术的比较。
J Int Med Res. 2019 Oct;47(10):4734-4742. doi: 10.1177/0300060519867822. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
6
Comparative intraindividual ablative tissue effects of diode laser 980 nm versus radiofrequency in tonsillar hypertrophy management.980纳米二极管激光与射频治疗扁桃体肥大的个体内消融组织效果比较
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2019 Jun;39(3):150-155. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-1909. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
7
Post-tonsillectomy pain after using bipolar diathermy scissors or the harmonic scalpel: a randomised blinded study.使用双极电凝剪刀或超声刀后扁桃体切除术后疼痛:一项随机双盲研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 May;274(5):2281-2285. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4451-9. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
8
Clinical practice guideline: tonsillitis II. Surgical management.临床实践指南:扁桃体炎 二、手术治疗
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Apr;273(4):989-1009. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-3904-x. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
9
A randomised controlled trial of coblation, diode laser and cold dissection in paediatric tonsillectomy.一项关于小儿扁桃体切除术中使用低温等离子刀、半导体激光和冷剥离术的随机对照试验。
J Laryngol Otol. 2015 Nov;129(11):1058-63. doi: 10.1017/S0022215115002376. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
10
Recent medical devices for tonsillectomy.近期的扁桃体切除术医疗设备。
Hippokratia. 2012 Jan;16(1):11-6.