Shin Chungheon, Szczuka Aleksandra, Liu Matthew J, Mendoza Lorelay, Jiang Renjing, Tilmans Sebastien H, Tarpeh William A, Mitch William A, Criddle Craig S
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, California 94305, United States.
National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center for Re-Inventing the Nation's Urban Water Infrastructure (ReNUWIt), 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, California 94305, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2022 Jun 21;56(12):8712-8721. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c07992. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
Treatment of domestic wastewater can recover valuable resources, including clean water, energy, and ammonia. Important metrics for these systems are greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and embodied energy, both of which are location- and technology-dependent. Here, we determine the embodied energy and GHG emissions resulting from a conventional process train, and we compare them to a nonconventional process train. The conventional train assumes freshwater conveyance from a pristine source that requires energy for pumping (US average of 0.29 kWh/m), aerobic secondary treatment with N removal as N, and Haber-Bosch synthesis of ammonia. Overall, we find that this process train has an embodied energy of 1.02 kWh/m and a GHG emission of 0.77 kg-COeq/m. We compare these metrics to those of a nonconventional process train that features anaerobic secondary treatment technology followed by further purification of the effluent by reverse osmosis and air stripping for ammonia recovery. This "short-cut" process train reduces embodied energy to 0.88 kWh/m and GHG emissions to 0.42 kg-COeq/m, while offsetting demand for ammonia from the Haber-Bosch process and decreasing reliance upon water transported over long distances. Finally, to assess the potential impacts of nonconventional nitrogen removal technology, we compared the embodied energy and GHG emissions resulting from partial nitritation/anammox coupled to anaerobic secondary treatment. The resulting process train enabled a lower embodied energy but increased GHG emissions, largely due to emissions of NO, a potent greenhouse gas.
生活污水处理可以回收宝贵的资源,包括清洁水、能源和氨。这些系统的重要指标是温室气体(GHG)排放和隐含能源,这两者都取决于地点和技术。在这里,我们确定了传统工艺路线产生的隐含能源和温室气体排放,并将它们与非传统工艺路线进行比较。传统工艺路线假设从原始水源输送淡水,这需要泵送能源(美国平均为0.29千瓦时/立方米),进行以氮形式去除氮的好氧二级处理,以及通过哈伯-博施法合成氨。总体而言,我们发现这条工艺路线的隐含能源为1.02千瓦时/立方米,温室气体排放为0.77千克二氧化碳当量/立方米。我们将这些指标与非传统工艺路线的指标进行比较,该路线采用厌氧二级处理技术,随后通过反渗透和空气汽提进一步净化出水以回收氨。这条“捷径”工艺路线将隐含能源降低至0.88千瓦时/立方米,温室气体排放降低至0.42千克二氧化碳当量/立方米,同时抵消了哈伯-博施工艺对氨的需求,并减少了对长距离输水的依赖。最后,为了评估非传统脱氮技术的潜在影响,我们比较了部分亚硝化/厌氧氨氧化与厌氧二级处理相结合产生的隐含能源和温室气体排放。由此产生的工艺路线隐含能源较低,但温室气体排放增加,这主要是由于强效温室气体一氧化氮的排放。