Standardized Reporting of Oncologic Response: Making Every Report Count.
作者信息
Do Richard K G, Lefkowitz Robert A, Hatzoglou Vaios, Ma Weining, Juluru Krishna, Mayerhoefer Marius
机构信息
From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065.
出版信息
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2022 Jun;4(4):e220042. doi: 10.1148/rycan.220042.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Standardized Reporting of Oncologic Response: Making Every Report Count.肿瘤反应的标准化报告：让每份报告都有价值。
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2022 Jun;4(4):e220042. doi: 10.1148/rycan.220042.
2
Preferences for structured reporting of measurement data: an institutional survey of medical oncologists, oncology registrars, and radiologists.测量数据结构化报告的偏好：对医学肿瘤学家、肿瘤学住院医师和放射科医生的机构调查
Acad Radiol. 2014 Jun;21(6):785-96. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.02.008.
3
[The "report--standardized form" in oncologic pathology].
Ann Pathol. 2003 Nov;Spec No 1:S50-63.
4
[Criteria for radiological assessment of therapy response: criteria-based appraisal].[治疗反应的放射学评估标准：基于标准的评估]
Radiologe. 2013 Apr;53(4):322-8. doi: 10.1007/s00117-012-2435-8.
5
Radiology reporting in oncology-oncologists' perspective.肿瘤学中的放射学报告——肿瘤学家的观点。
Cancer Imaging. 2021 Nov 25;21(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s40644-021-00431-5.
6
Current and future trends in imaging informatics for oncology.肿瘤影像学信息学的当前和未来趋势。
Cancer J. 2011 Jul-Aug;17(4):203-10. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3182272f04.
7
[Advances in molecular oncologic pathology].[分子肿瘤病理学进展]
Ai Zheng. 2007 Jan;26(1):106-12.
8
Between Scylla and Charybdis - Oncologic Decision Making in the Time of Covid-19.进退维谷——新冠疫情时期的肿瘤学决策
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 11;382(24):2285-2287. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2006588. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
9
[Patient or disease in oncology?].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2021 Jun 24;165:D5814.
10
[The ICD-9-CM code for oncologic and hemato-oncologic recovery: between rules, uncertainty, and discretion: what to do?].
Tumori. 2000 Jan-Feb;86(1 Suppl 1):S1-49.
引用本文的文献
1
Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics with Machine Learning Outperforms Radiologist Assessment in Estimating Colorectal Liver Metastases Pathologic Response After Chemotherapy.基于计算机断层扫描的放射组学结合机器学习在预测化疗后结直肠癌肝转移病理反应方面优于放射科医生评估。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Dec;31(13):9196-9204. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15373-y. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
2
Imaging-Based Disease Assessment and Management Recommendations: Impact of Multidisciplinary Sarcoma Tumor Board.基于影像学的疾病评估与管理建议：多学科肉瘤肿瘤委员会的影响
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jul 26;16(15):2674. doi: 10.3390/cancers16152674.
3
Perceptions of radiologists on structured reporting for cancer imaging-a survey by the European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI).放射科医生对癌症影像结构化报告的看法——欧洲肿瘤影像学会（ESOI）的一项调查
Eur Radiol. 2024 Aug;34(8):5120-5130. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10397-6. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
4
Applying Natural Language Processing to Single-Report Prediction of Metastatic Disease Response Using the OR-RADS Lexicon.运用自然语言处理技术，借助OR-RADS词汇表对转移性疾病反应进行单报告预测。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Oct 10;15(20):4909. doi: 10.3390/cancers15204909.
5
Discrepant Assessments of Progressive Disease in Clinical Trials between Routine Clinical Reads and Formal RECIST 1.1 Interpretations.临床试验中常规临床解读与正式 RECIST 1.1 解读评估进展性疾病的差异。
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2023 Sep;5(5):e230001. doi: 10.1148/rycan.230001.
6
Direct Evaluation of Treatment Response in Brain Metastatic Disease with Deep Neuroevolution.脑转移瘤中深度神经进化治疗反应的直接评估。
J Digit Imaging. 2023 Apr;36(2):536-546. doi: 10.1007/s10278-022-00725-5. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
本文引用的文献
1
What Is It We Do Here?我们在这里做什么？
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Jan;218(1):184-185. doi: 10.2214/AJR.21.26565. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
2
Understanding patient needs and gaps in radiology reports through online discussion forum analysis.通过在线讨论论坛分析了解患者需求及放射学报告中的差距。
Insights Imaging. 2021 Apr 19;12(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13244-020-00930-2.
3
Early Adoption of a Certainty Scale to Improve Diagnostic Certainty Communication.早期采用确定性量表以改善诊断确定性沟通。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Oct;17(10):1276-1284. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.03.033. Epub 2020 May 5.
4
Validity of RECIST Version 1.1 for Response Assessment in Metastatic Cancer: A Prospective, Multireader Study.RECIST 版本 1.1 用于评估转移性癌症反应的有效性：一项前瞻性、多读者研究。
Radiology. 2019 Feb;290(2):349-356. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018180648. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
5
Qualitative Reporting of Lesion Number: Do Radiologists and Referring Physicians Understand Each Other?病变数量的定性报告：放射科医生和转诊医生彼此理解吗？
J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Aug;15(8):1178-1181. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.049. Epub 2018 May 18.
6
Integrating Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning Algorithms to Categorize Oncologic Response in Radiology Reports.将自然语言处理和机器学习算法集成到放射学报告中的肿瘤反应分类中。
J Digit Imaging. 2018 Apr;31(2):178-184. doi: 10.1007/s10278-017-0027-x.
7
iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics.iRECIST：免疫治疗试验中使用的疗效评估标准指南。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Mar;18(3):e143-e152. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30074-8. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
8
How Sure Are You, Doctor? A Standardized Lexicon to Describe the Radiologist's Level of Certainty.医生，你有多确定？一个描述放射科医生确定程度的标准化词汇表。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Jul;207(1):2-3. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15895. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
9
How "consistent" is "consistent"? A clinician-based assessment of the reliability of expressions used by radiologists to communicate diagnostic confidence.“一致”有多“一致”？基于临床医生的评估，评估放射科医生用于表达诊断信心的表述的可靠性。
Clin Radiol. 2014 Jul;69(7):745-9. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 May 13.
10
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).实体瘤新的疗效评价标准：修订的RECIST指南（第1.1版）
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.
Zotero 插件