• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过在线讨论论坛分析了解患者需求及放射学报告中的差距。

Understanding patient needs and gaps in radiology reports through online discussion forum analysis.

作者信息

Alarifi Mohammad, Patrick Timothy, Jabour Abdulrahman, Wu Min, Luo Jake

机构信息

College of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, 53211, USA.

College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Insights Imaging. 2021 Apr 19;12(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13244-020-00930-2.

DOI:10.1186/s13244-020-00930-2
PMID:33871753
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8055745/
Abstract

Our objective is to investigate patient needs and understand information gaps in radiology reports using patient questions that were posted on online discussion forums. We leveraged online question and answer platforms to collect questions posted by patients to understand current gaps and patient needs. We retrieved six hundred fifty-nine (659) questions using the following sites: Yahoo Answers, Reddit.com, Quora, and Wiki Answers. The questions retrieved were analyzed and the major themes and topics were identified. The questions retrieved were classified into eight major themes. The themes were related to the following topics: radiology report, safety, price, preparation, procedure, meaning, medical staff, and patient portal. Among the 659 questions, 35.50% were concerned with the radiology report. The most common question topics in the radiology report focused on patient understanding of the radiology report (62 of 234 [26.49%]), image visualization (53 of 234 [22.64%]), and report representation (46 of 234 [19.65%]). We also found that most patients were concerned about understanding the MRI report (32%; n = 143) compared with the other imaging modalities (n = 434). Using online discussion forums, we discussed major unmet patient needs and information gaps in radiology reports. These issues could be improved to enhance radiology design in the future.

摘要

我们的目标是利用在线讨论论坛上发布的患者问题,调查患者需求并了解放射学报告中的信息差距。我们利用在线问答平台收集患者提出的问题,以了解当前的差距和患者需求。我们通过以下网站检索了659个问题:雅虎问答、Reddit.com、Quora和维基问答。对检索到的问题进行分析,并确定主要主题和话题。检索到的问题被分为八个主要主题。这些主题与以下话题相关:放射学报告、安全性、价格、准备、程序、含义、医务人员和患者门户。在这659个问题中,35.50%与放射学报告有关。放射学报告中最常见的问题主题集中在患者对放射学报告的理解(234个问题中的62个[26.49%])、图像可视化(234个问题中的53个[22.64%])和报告呈现(234个问题中的46个[19.65%])。我们还发现,与其他成像方式(n = 434)相比,大多数患者更关心对MRI报告的理解(32%;n = 143)。通过在线讨论论坛,我们讨论了放射学报告中未满足的主要患者需求和信息差距。未来可以改进这些问题,以加强放射学设计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bf2/8055745/10c9c31e53d2/13244_2020_930_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bf2/8055745/5b73d8ba12e3/13244_2020_930_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bf2/8055745/0f49935c9ccc/13244_2020_930_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bf2/8055745/a468a95058aa/13244_2020_930_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bf2/8055745/10c9c31e53d2/13244_2020_930_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bf2/8055745/5b73d8ba12e3/13244_2020_930_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bf2/8055745/0f49935c9ccc/13244_2020_930_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bf2/8055745/a468a95058aa/13244_2020_930_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bf2/8055745/10c9c31e53d2/13244_2020_930_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding patient needs and gaps in radiology reports through online discussion forum analysis.通过在线讨论论坛分析了解患者需求及放射学报告中的差距。
Insights Imaging. 2021 Apr 19;12(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13244-020-00930-2.
2
Safe Food Handling Advice Provided on Question-and-Answer Web Sites Is Inconsistent.问答网站提供的食品安全处理建议不一致。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020 Jul;52(7):688-696. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2019.12.011. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
3
Designing a Consumer-Friendly Radiology Report using a Patient-Centered Approach.以患者为中心的方法设计便于消费者理解的放射科报告。
J Digit Imaging. 2021 Jun;34(3):705-716. doi: 10.1007/s10278-021-00448-z. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
4
Understanding Trail Runners' Activity on Online Community Forums: An Inductive Analysis of Discussion Topics.了解越野跑者在在线社区论坛上的活动:对讨论主题的归纳分析。
J Hum Kinet. 2018 Mar 23;61:263-276. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0125. eCollection 2018 Mar.
5
Online forum messages posted by adolescents with type 1 diabetes.1型糖尿病青少年发布的在线论坛信息。
Diabetes Educ. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):827-34. doi: 10.1177/014572170403000518.
6
Understanding the use of heart failure online health forums: a qualitative study.理解心力衰竭在线健康论坛的使用:一项定性研究。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2022 Jun 2;21(4):374-381. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvab090.
7
What Online Communities Can Tell Us About Electronic Cigarettes and Hookah Use: A Study Using Text Mining and Visualization Techniques.在线社区能告诉我们关于电子烟和水烟使用的哪些信息:一项运用文本挖掘和可视化技术的研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Sep 29;17(9):e220. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4517.
8
Understanding Patient Questions about their Medical Records in an Online Health Forum: Opportunity for Patient Portal Design.理解在线健康论坛中患者关于其病历的问题:患者门户设计的机遇
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Apr 16;2017:1468-1477. eCollection 2017.
9
Vaccine information seeking on social Q&A services.疫苗信息在社交问答服务上的检索。
Vaccine. 2020 Mar 10;38(12):2691-2699. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.02.010. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
10
Autistic discussion forums: insights into the topics that clinicians don't know about.自闭症讨论论坛:洞悉临床医生未知的话题。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Dec 19;14:1271841. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1271841. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Do you Really Want to Know-Patient and Physician Attitudes of Physicians and English-Proficient Asian Patients toward Direct Release of Radiology Reports in Singapore.你真的想知道吗——新加坡医生以及英语熟练的亚洲患者对于直接发放放射学报告的医患态度
J Imaging Inform Med. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.1007/s10278-025-01655-8.
2
Optimizing patient understanding of spine MRI reports using AI: A prospective single center study.利用人工智能优化患者对脊柱磁共振成像报告的理解:一项前瞻性单中心研究。
Interv Pain Med. 2025 Feb 18;4(1):100550. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100550. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
American College of Veterinary Radiology and European College of Veterinary Diagnostic Imaging consensus statement on imaging report foundations.

本文引用的文献

1
Full Radiology Report through Patient Web Portal: A Literature Review.患者网络门户的全放射学报告:文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 22;17(10):3673. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103673.
2
Community engagement in patient-centered outcomes research: Benefits, barriers, and measurement.以患者为中心的结局研究中的社区参与:益处、障碍及衡量方法
J Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Dec;2(6):371-376. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.341.
3
Readability of Lumbar Spine MRI Reports: Will Patients Understand?腰椎磁共振成像报告的可读性:患者能理解吗?
美国兽医放射学会和欧洲兽医诊断影像学会关于影像报告基础的共识声明。
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2025 Jan;66(1):e13471. doi: 10.1111/vru.13471.
4
The impact of different radiology report formats on patient information processing: a systematic review.不同放射学报告格式对患者信息处理的影响:一项系统综述
Eur Radiol. 2025 May;35(5):2644-2657. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11165-w. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
5
Generating colloquial radiology reports with large language models.基于大语言模型生成口语化的放射科报告。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Nov 1;31(11):2660-2667. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae223.
6
Artificial Intelligence and Healthcare: A Journey through History, Present Innovations, and Future Possibilities.人工智能与医疗保健:一段贯穿历史、当前创新及未来可能性的历程。
Life (Basel). 2024 Apr 26;14(5):557. doi: 10.3390/life14050557.
7
Characterization of COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial discussions on the social question-and-answer site Quora.中文:对社交问答网站 Quora 上关于 COVID-19 疫苗临床试验讨论的描述。
Trials. 2023 Dec 5;24(1):790. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07837-5.
8
Patient experience of imaging reports: A systematic literature review.患者对影像报告的体验:一项系统的文献综述。
Ultrasound. 2023 Aug;31(3):164-175. doi: 10.1177/1742271X221140024. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
9
Proposed Questions to Assess the Extent of Knowledge in Understanding the Radiology Report Language.评估理解放射科报告语言知识程度的拟议问题。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 19;19(18):11808. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811808.
10
Standardized Reporting of Oncologic Response: Making Every Report Count.肿瘤反应的标准化报告:让每份报告都有价值。
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2022 Jun;4(4):e220042. doi: 10.1148/rycan.220042.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Mar;212(3):602-606. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20197. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
4
Constricting the Radiologic Lexicon: An Orwellian Errand?压缩放射学词汇:一项奥威尔式的任务?
Acad Radiol. 2019 Feb;26(2):300-301. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
5
Taking a proactive role in patient management of important incidental imaging findings: How can we increase the 'value' of diagnostic radiology service and improve quality of patient care?在重要的偶然影像发现的患者管理中发挥积极作用:我们如何提高诊断放射学服务的“价值”并改善患者护理质量?
Jpn J Radiol. 2018 Oct;36(10):579-580. doi: 10.1007/s11604-018-0766-8. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
6
The True Purpose of a Radiology Report.放射学报告的真正目的。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Oct;15(10):1450. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.05.035. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
7
Effect of self-monitoring on long-term patient engagement with mobile health applications.自我监测对移动医疗应用长期患者参与度的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 26;13(7):e0201166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201166. eCollection 2018.
8
Direct communication between radiologists and patients following imaging examinations. Should radiologists rethink their patient care?影像检查后放射科医生与患者的直接沟通。放射科医生是否应该重新思考他们的患者护理方式?
Eur Radiol. 2019 Jan;29(1):224-231. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5503-2. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
9
Perception of radiology reporting efficacy by neurologists in general and university hospitals.综合医院和大学医院的神经科医生对放射学报告效能的认知
Clin Radiol. 2018 Jul;73(7):675.e1-675.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
10
Coverage and Readability of Information Resources to Help Patients Understand Radiology Reports.帮助患者理解放射学报告的信息资源的覆盖范围和可读性。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Dec;15(12):1681-1686. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.11.019. Epub 2017 Dec 28.