School of Nursing Department of Systems, Populations and Leadership, and Population Studies Center and Survey Research Center at the Institute for Social Research, 1259University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
1466Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Feb;38(3-4):3344-3372. doi: 10.1177/08862605221106131. Epub 2022 Jun 4.
Despite the fact that intimate partner violence (IPV) occurs within intimate relationships, we know relatively little about the characteristics of those intimate relationships, and even less about how IPV changes across time within different relationships. We use the Relationship Dynamics and Social Life (RDSL) study, based on a random sample of 1003 18-19-year-old women residing in a Michigan county. Women were interviewed weekly for 2.5 years, resulting in an age range of 18 through 22. We estimate hybrid "within-between" regression models, which allows us to directly compare the same woman's risk of experiencing IPV across her different relationships, varied in terms of resources, balance of power, conflict, childbearing, relationship type, and duration. Our analyses demonstrate that power imbalance in intimate relationships, non-monogamous and unstable relationships, relationships with men who are not the father of a woman's existing children, and serious relationships (especially stayover and cohabiting) place young women in their late teens and early twenties at particularly high risk of multiple dimensions of IPV. Our fixed-effects modeling strategy isolated the increase in IPV risk that is due to these characteristics and experiences within intimate relationships from the risk due to young women being at high risk of IPV for reasons who might tend to choose these types of relationships. The risk of IPV in relationships with these characteristics and experiences supports a causal link between them. Our research supports the potential efficacy of interventions that reduce conflict, equalize power within relationships, and encourage women-especially young mothers-to delay serious relationships.
尽管亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)发生在亲密关系中,但我们对这些亲密关系的特征知之甚少,甚至对不同关系中 IPV 随时间的变化知之甚少。我们使用了基于密歇根县 1003 名 18-19 岁女性的随机样本的关系动态和社会生活(RDSL)研究。女性在 2.5 年内每周接受一次采访,年龄范围从 18 岁到 22 岁。我们估计混合“内-间”回归模型,这使我们能够直接比较同一个女人在不同关系中经历 IPV 的风险,这些关系在资源、权力平衡、冲突、生育、关系类型和持续时间方面各不相同。我们的分析表明,亲密关系中的权力失衡、非一夫一妻制和不稳定的关系、与不是女性现有子女父亲的男性的关系,以及严重的关系(特别是过夜和同居),使十几岁和二十出头的年轻女性面临多种形式的 IPV 的风险特别高。我们的固定效应建模策略将亲密关系中这些特征和经历导致的 IPV 风险增加与年轻女性由于可能倾向于选择这些类型的关系而处于 IPV 高风险的原因导致的风险隔离开来。具有这些特征和经历的关系中的 IPV 风险支持了它们之间存在因果关系的假设。我们的研究支持了减少冲突、平衡关系中权力以及鼓励女性——尤其是年轻母亲——延迟严肃关系的干预措施的潜在效果。