Massachusetts Executive Office of Elder Affairs, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Gerontology and Gerontology Institute, John W. McCormack Graduate School of Policy & Global Studies, 14708University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA.
J Appl Gerontol. 2022 Oct;41(10):2140-2147. doi: 10.1177/07334648221107073. Epub 2022 Jun 4.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act included Community First Choice (CFC), a new optional Medicaid home and community-based services (HCBS) state plan benefit which states could adopt. Through the CFC program, states can provide expanded home and community-based attendant services and supports to older adults and persons with disabilities. A benefit of CFC is that states receive a higher federal match rate than other HCBS programs. Thus far, eights states have adopted CFC. This comparative case study analysis examines state-level implementation of CFC to identify what facilitated implementation and what created challenges. The results suggest that consulting with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services facilitated implementation while existing programs, insufficient engagement with stakeholders, aggressive timelines, and limited staff resources presented challenges. Based on these findings, states may want to consider how they approach implementing expansions or enhancements to HCBS benefits under the American Rescue Plan Act.
《患者保护与平价医疗法案》包括社区首选(CFC),这是一项新的可选医疗补助家庭和社区为基础的服务(HCBS)州计划福利,各州可以选择采用。通过 CFC 计划,各州可以为老年人和残疾人提供更多的家庭和社区服务和支持。CFC 的一个好处是,各州获得的联邦匹配率高于其他 HCBS 计划。到目前为止,有八个州已经采用了 CFC。本案例研究分析考察了各州 CFC 的实施情况,以确定促进实施的因素和面临的挑战。结果表明,与医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心协商有助于实施,而现有计划、与利益相关者的接触不足、激进的时间表和有限的人员资源则带来了挑战。基于这些发现,各州在实施《美国救援计划法案》下的 HCBS 福利扩大或增强时,可以考虑如何处理这些问题。