University of Massachusetts Boston.
Mystic Valley Elder Services.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2024 Apr 1;49(2):289-313. doi: 10.1215/03616878-10989703.
The need to bolster Medicaid home and community-based services (HCBS) became more evident during the COVID-19 pandemic. This recognition stemmed from the challenges of keeping people safe in nursing homes and the acute workforce shortages in the HCBS sector. This article examines two major federal developments and state responses in HCBS options as a result of the pandemic. The first initiative entails a one-year increase of the federal Medicaid matching rate for HCBS included in the American Rescue Plan Act championed by the Biden administration. The second initiative encompasses administrative flexibilities that permitted states to temporarily expand and modify their existing Medicaid HCBS programs. The article concludes that the effects of the pandemic flexibilities and enhanced federal funding on most state HCBS programs will be limited without continued investment and leadership on the part of the federal government, which is a Biden administration priority. States that make the American Rescue Act and COVID-19 flexibilities initiatives permanent are states that have the fiscal resources and political commitment to expanding HCBS benefits that other states lack. States' different approaches to bolstering Medicaid HCBS during the pandemic may contribute to widening disparities in access and quality of HCBS across states and populations who depend on Medicaid HCBS.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,加强医疗补助计划(Medicaid)的家庭和社区服务(HCBS)的需求变得更加明显。这种认识源于在养老院保持人们安全的挑战,以及 HCBS 部门的急性劳动力短缺。本文探讨了大流行导致的 HCBS 选择中的两个主要联邦发展和州级应对措施。第一项倡议涉及拜登政府倡导的《美国救援计划法案》(American Rescue Plan Act)中包含的为期一年的 HCBS 联邦医疗补助匹配率的增加。第二项倡议包括行政灵活性,允许各州临时扩大和修改其现有的 Medicaid HCBS 计划。文章的结论是,如果没有联邦政府的持续投资和领导,大流行灵活性和增强的联邦资金对大多数州的 HCBS 计划的影响将是有限的,这是拜登政府的优先事项。将《美国救援法案》和 COVID-19 灵活性倡议永久化的州是那些拥有扩大 HCBS 福利的财政资源和政治承诺的州,而其他州则缺乏这种资源和承诺。各州在大流行期间加强医疗补助计划的不同方法可能会导致各州和依赖医疗补助计划的 HCBS 的人群在获取和 HCBS 质量方面的差距扩大。