• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从回避到获取:理解健康信息行为改变的框架开发:扎根理论探索。

Developing a framework for understanding health information behavior change from avoidance to acquisition: a grounded theory exploration.

机构信息

Institute of Medical Information & Library, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences / Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 4;22(1):1115. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13522-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-022-13522-0
PMID:35658937
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9166210/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health information avoidance is common in real life, but because it is not always conducive to health promotion and maintenance, people often actively switch to health information acquisition. Understanding this process of active change can facilitate intervention in unreasonable avoidance behaviors. However, studies so far have mostly focused on why and how avoidance takes place, little is known about the process of active change from avoidance to acquisition. We thus use a grounded theory approach (GT) to explore how the active change takes place, and to generate a grounded theoretical framework capable of illustrating stages and influencing factors involved in the active change process.

METHODS

Straussian grounded theory (Corbin & Strauss, 2015) was used to analyze data collected through semi-structured interviews with 30 adults (14 in good health, 11 with disease, 5 in other health status) who had experienced health information behavior change from avoidance to acquisition. These interviews focused on how the change occurred and what effected the change.

RESULTS

The core category of Health Information Avoidance Change and 12 categories were identified and integrated to form a theoretical framework termed the Health Information Avoidance Change Model (HIACM). This model describes the process using five non-linear stage variables (initiation, preparation, action, maintenance, and abandonment) and seven moderating factor variables (cognitive change, social stimulus, beliefs and attitudes, intrapsychic literacy, social resources, information source, time and material resources).

CONCLUSIONS

HIACM can be used to explain the process of active change from health information avoidance to health information acquisition. HIAC is a non-linear and holistic process, and it is necessary to dynamically analyze the impact of relevant factors and take targeted intervention measures in stages. HIAC is usually not only an individual behavior, but also a socialized behavior requiring the collaboration of individuals, families, health information providers, healthcare providers, and governments.

摘要

背景

健康信息回避在现实生活中很常见,但由于它并不总是有利于促进和维护健康,人们通常会主动转而获取健康信息。了解这种从回避到获取的主动转变过程,可以促进对不合理回避行为的干预。然而,迄今为止的研究大多集中在回避行为发生的原因和方式上,对于从回避到获取的主动转变过程知之甚少。因此,我们采用扎根理论方法(GT)来探讨主动转变是如何发生的,并生成一个能够说明主动转变过程中涉及的阶段和影响因素的扎根理论框架。

方法

采用施特劳斯的扎根理论(Corbin & Strauss, 2015)对 30 名成年人(14 名健康状况良好,11 名患有疾病,5 名其他健康状况)的半结构化访谈数据进行分析,这些成年人经历了从回避到获取健康信息行为的转变。这些访谈重点关注转变是如何发生的以及是什么影响了转变。

结果

确定了核心类别“健康信息回避转变”和 12 个类别,并将其整合为一个理论框架,称为“健康信息回避转变模型(HIACM)”。该模型使用五个非线性阶段变量(启动、准备、行动、维持和放弃)和七个调节因素变量(认知转变、社会刺激、信念和态度、内省力、社会资源、信息源、时间和物质资源)来描述转变过程。

结论

HIACM 可用于解释从健康信息回避到健康信息获取的主动转变过程。HIAC 是一个非线性和整体的过程,有必要动态分析相关因素的影响,并分阶段采取有针对性的干预措施。HIAC 通常不仅是一种个体行为,也是一种需要个人、家庭、健康信息提供者、医疗保健提供者和政府共同协作的社会化行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c265/9166315/1e7076dc75c4/12889_2022_13522_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c265/9166315/e760abbc6958/12889_2022_13522_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c265/9166315/1e7076dc75c4/12889_2022_13522_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c265/9166315/e760abbc6958/12889_2022_13522_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c265/9166315/1e7076dc75c4/12889_2022_13522_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing a framework for understanding health information behavior change from avoidance to acquisition: a grounded theory exploration.从回避到获取:理解健康信息行为改变的框架开发:扎根理论探索。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 4;22(1):1115. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13522-0.
2
Understanding the process of people with hypersensitivity pneumonitis implementing continuous antigen avoidance and their affecting situations: A grounded theory study.理解过敏性肺炎患者实施持续抗原回避及其影响情况的过程:扎根理论研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jun;32(11-12):2880-2891. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16395. Epub 2022 Jun 5.
3
Healthcare providers' perspectives on perceived barriers and facilitators of compassion: Results from a grounded theory study.医疗保健提供者对同情心的感知障碍和促进因素的看法:扎根理论研究的结果。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 May;27(9-10):2083-2097. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14357.
4
An explanation of turnover intention among early-career nursing and allied health professionals working in rural and remote Australia - findings from a grounded theory study.澳大利亚农村和偏远地区初入职场的护理及相关健康专业人员离职意向的解释——基于扎根理论研究的结果
Rural Remote Health. 2018 Sep;18(3):4511. doi: 10.22605/RRH4511. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
5
Culture of discrimination in healthcare: A grounded theory.医疗保健中的歧视文化:一种扎根理论。
Nurs Ethics. 2023 Mar;30(2):302-316. doi: 10.1177/09697330221130608. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
6
What are healthcare providers' understandings and experiences of compassion? The healthcare compassion model: a grounded theory study of healthcare providers in Canada.医护人员对同情心的理解和体验是什么?加拿大医护人员的同情心模型:一项扎根理论研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 14;8(3):e019701. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019701.
7
Realization and personalization by facing fatality: A grounded theory of developing the view of dying in people with heart failure.面对死亡的实现和个性化:心力衰竭患者对临终观点发展的扎根理论。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Jun;77(6):2796-2806. doi: 10.1111/jan.14826. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
8
Psycho-emotional recovery, the meaning of care in the process of providing palliative care to Iranian people with cancer: A grounded theory study.心理情绪恢复,在为伊朗癌症患者提供姑息治疗过程中的关怀意义:扎根理论研究。
Nurs Open. 2023 Feb;10(2):889-900. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1357. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
9
Nurse managed patient focused assessment and care: A grounded theory of qualified nurses in acute and critical care settings assessing the mental capacity of adult patients.护士主导的以患者为中心的评估和护理:急性和重症监护环境中合格护士评估成年患者精神能力的扎根理论。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Apr;29(7-8):1254-1266. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15188. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
10
Information Access and Use by Patients With Cancer and Their Friends and Family: Development of a Grounded Theory.癌症患者及其朋友和家人的信息获取和使用:扎根理论的发展。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 29;22(10):e20510. doi: 10.2196/20510.

引用本文的文献

1
A model for predicting factors affecting health information avoidance on WeChat.一个用于预测影响微信健康信息回避因素的模型。
Digit Health. 2025 Feb 13;11:20552076251314277. doi: 10.1177/20552076251314277. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Developing a framework for community childcare doctors to support community-based parental health education in preventing unintentional injuries among children aged below 6 years: a grounded theory exploration in eastern China.构建社区儿童保健医生支持6岁以下儿童意外伤害预防的社区家长健康教育框架:中国东部地区的扎根理论探索
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 5;14(12):e084414. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084414.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Explaining Online Information Seeking Behaviors in People With Different Health Statuses: German Representative Cross-sectional Survey.不同健康状况人群的在线信息寻求行为解释:德国代表性横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 10;23(12):e25963. doi: 10.2196/25963.
2
From information seeking to information avoidance: Understanding the health information behavior during a global health crisis.从信息寻求到信息回避:理解全球健康危机期间的健康信息行为
Inf Process Manag. 2021 Mar;58(2):102440. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102440. Epub 2020 Nov 29.
3
Dealing With the COVID-19 Infodemic: Distress by Information, Information Avoidance, and Compliance With Preventive Measures.
Adolescents and young adults' concerns under stress, the COVID-19 pandemic: a Portuguese cross-sectional study.
青少年和年轻人在压力下的担忧,新冠疫情:一项葡萄牙横断面研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 18;14:1260070. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260070. eCollection 2023.
应对新冠疫情信息疫情:信息引发的困扰、信息回避与对预防措施的遵守
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 5;11:567905. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.567905. eCollection 2020.
4
What motivates Chinese consumers to avoid information about the COVID-19 pandemic?: The perspective of the stimulus-organism-response model.是什么促使中国消费者回避新冠疫情信息?:刺激-机体-反应模型视角
Inf Process Manag. 2021 Jan;58(1):102407. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102407. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
5
How to fight an infodemic.如何应对信息疫情。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 29;395(10225):676. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30461-X.
6
Population Whole Exome Screening: Primary Care Provider Attitudes About Preparedness, Information Avoidance, and Nudging.人群全外显子组筛查:初级保健提供者对准备情况、信息回避和推动的态度。
Med Clin North Am. 2019 Nov;103(6):1077-1092. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2019.08.004.
7
Powerful audiences are linked to health information avoidance: Results from two surveys.强大的受众与健康信息回避有关:两项调查的结果。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Mar;225:51-59. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.046. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
8
Factors beyond Lack of Knowledge That Predict "I Don't Know" Responses to Surveys That Assess HPV Knowledge.除知识匮乏外,可预测对评估HPV知识的调查给出“我不知道”回答的因素。
J Health Commun. 2018;23(10-11):967-976. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2018.1554729. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
9
Data analysis: comparison between the different methodological perspectives of the Grounded Theory.数据分析:扎根理论不同方法论视角之间的比较
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2018;52:e03303. doi: 10.1590/s1980-220x2017021803303. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
10
Patient-centered approaches to creating understandable health information.以患者为中心的方法来创建易懂的健康信息。
Urol Oncol. 2017 Sep;35(9):559-563. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.06.055. Epub 2017 Jul 21.