Nevro Corporation, 1800 Bridge Parkway, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Nevro Corporation, 1800 Bridge Parkway, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Neurosci Lett. 2022 Jun 21;782:136705. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2022.136705. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
Since 1967, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used to manage chronic intractable pain of the trunk and limbs. Low-intensity, paresthesia-free, 10 kHz SCS has demonstrated statistically- and clinically-superior long-term pain relief compared to conventional SCS. 10 kHz SCS has been proposed to operate via selective activation of inhibitory interneurons in the superficial dorsal horn. In contrast, 40 Hz SCS is presumed to operate largely via dorsal column fiber activation. To determine if these mechanisms may be implemented synergistically, we examined the effect of each type of stimulation both independently and simultaneously on putatively inhibitory and putatively excitatory neurons in the superficial dorsal horn. When 10 kHz SCS was applied relatively caudally to the measured spinal segment, simultaneous with 40 Hz SCS applied relatively rostrally to that spinal segment, inhibitory interneurons demonstrated a median increase of 26 spikes/s compared to their baseline firing rates. Median firing rate increases of inhibitory interneurons were 8.7 and 5.1 spikes/s during 40 Hz SCS applied rostrally and 10 kHz SCS applied caudally, respectively. By comparison, the median firing rate of excitatory interneurons increased by 4.1 spikes/s during simultaneous 40 Hz SCS applied rostrally and 10 kHz SCS applied caudally. Median firing rate increases of excitatory interneurons were 13 and 0.8 spikes/s during 40 Hz SCS applied rostrally and 10 kHz SCS applied caudally, respectively. This suggests that simultaneously applying 10 kHz SCS caudally and 40 Hz SCS rostrally may provide greater pain relief than either type of SCS alone by increasing the firing rates of inhibitory interneurons, albeit with greater excitatory interneuron activation.
自 1967 年以来,脊髓刺激(SCS)已被用于治疗躯干和四肢的慢性顽固性疼痛。与传统 SCS 相比,低强度、无刺痛感、10 kHz SCS 已被证明在长期缓解疼痛方面具有统计学和临床优势。10 kHz SCS 被认为通过选择性激活浅层背角中的抑制性中间神经元起作用。相比之下,40 Hz SCS 被认为主要通过背柱纤维激活起作用。为了确定这些机制是否可以协同发挥作用,我们分别检查了每种类型的刺激对浅层背角中假定的抑制性和兴奋性神经元的独立和同时作用。当 10 kHz SCS 相对于所测量的脊髓节段相对较尾侧施加时,同时将 40 Hz SCS 相对于该脊髓节段相对较头侧施加,抑制性中间神经元的中位放电率比基线放电率增加 26 次/秒。当 40 Hz SCS 施加于头侧且 10 kHz SCS 施加于尾侧时,抑制性中间神经元的中位放电率分别增加 8.7 和 5.1 次/秒。相比之下,当同时施加头侧的 40 Hz SCS 和尾侧的 10 kHz SCS 时,兴奋性中间神经元的中位放电率增加 4.1 次/秒。当 40 Hz SCS 施加于头侧且 10 kHz SCS 施加于尾侧时,兴奋性中间神经元的中位放电率分别增加 13 和 0.8 次/秒。这表明,通过增加抑制性中间神经元的放电率,同时施加尾侧的 10 kHz SCS 和头侧的 40 Hz SCS 可能比单独施加任何一种 SCS 类型提供更大的疼痛缓解,尽管兴奋性中间神经元的激活更大。