Suppr超能文献

“传统临床”及更高频率脊髓刺激对脊髓神经元活动及对伤害性刺激反应的影响:一项动物研究

Spinal Cord Stimulation With "Conventional Clinical" and Higher Frequencies on Activity and Responses of Spinal Neurons to Noxious Stimuli: An Animal Study.

作者信息

Li Shiying, Farber Jay P, Linderoth Bengt, Chen Jiande, Foreman Robert D

机构信息

Veterans Research Education Foundation, VA Medical Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Neuromodulation. 2018 Jul;21(5):440-447. doi: 10.1111/ner.12725. Epub 2017 Nov 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) at both conventional and higher frequencies may effectively reduce pain, but optimal parameters need to be established. This study investigated how SCS at different frequencies and pulse widths acutely modulates nociceptive activity of wide dynamic range (WDR) and high threshold (HT) dorsal horn neurons in rats at a stimulus amplitude that influences both local circuits and dorsal column fibers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

L -L and L -S spinal segments were exposed for SCS and spinal neuronal recordings, respectively. Responses to pinch of a hindpaw were recorded before and after SCS (40 or 200 µsec pulse width at 50, 500, 1 kHz and 10 kHz, amplitude: 90% of motor threshold) for 5 or 20 min. Pinch responses were tested within 30 s after SCS ceased (first pinch) and at ∼4 min intervals until response recovery.

RESULTS

  1. SCS for 5 min suppressed averaged first pinch responses, except for 40 µsec/50 Hz. 2) Only SCS with 40 µs/1 kHz suppressed more spinal neurons than 200 µsec/50 Hz. 3) All SCS parameters at 5 min increased pinch responses for a small population of cells, with the incidence being greater for WDR than for HT neurons. 4) SCS at 1 kHz (40 or 200 µsec) for 20 min reduced the response to the second pinch as compared with baseline responses. In addition, no neurons exhibited increased pinch responses.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with a typical low frequency SCS (200 µs/50 Hz) or high-frequency SCS at 10 kHz, at an amplitude designed to influence both local spinal circuits and dorsal column fiber tracts, 1 kHz SCS suppressed nociceptive responses of more spinal neurons and/or demonstrated longer persisting suppressive effects. SCS at 1 kHz surpassed both low-frequency (50 Hz) and high-frequency (10 kHz) SCS application in this normal animal model.

摘要

目的

常规频率和更高频率的脊髓刺激(SCS)均可有效减轻疼痛,但需要确定最佳参数。本研究调查了在影响局部回路和背柱纤维的刺激幅度下,不同频率和脉宽的SCS如何急性调节大鼠广动力范围(WDR)和高阈值(HT)背角神经元的伤害性活动。

材料与方法

分别暴露L-L和L-S脊髓节段用于SCS和脊髓神经元记录。在SCS(50、500、1kHz和10kHz,脉宽40或200微秒,幅度:运动阈值的90%)前后5或20分钟记录对后爪捏夹的反应。在SCS停止后30秒内(第一次捏夹)以及每隔约4分钟直至反应恢复时测试捏夹反应。

结果

1)除40微秒/50Hz外,SCS持续5分钟可抑制平均首次捏夹反应。2)只有40微秒/1kHz的SCS比200微秒/50Hz抑制更多的脊髓神经元。3)5分钟时所有SCS参数均使一小部分细胞的捏夹反应增加,WDR神经元的发生率高于HT神经元。4)与基线反应相比,1kHz(40或200微秒)的SCS持续20分钟可降低对第二次捏夹的反应。此外,没有神经元表现出捏夹反应增加。

结论

与典型的低频SCS(200微秒/50Hz)或10kHz的高频SCS相比,在旨在影响局部脊髓回路和背柱纤维束的幅度下,1kHz的SCS抑制更多脊髓神经元的伤害性反应和/或表现出更长时间的持续抑制作用。在这个正常动物模型中,1kHz的SCS优于低频(50Hz)和高频(10kHz)SCS应用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验